Iraqi Resistance Group Says Not to Target Elections

Three days ahead of the con­tro­ver­sial vote, a lead­ing Iraqi resis­tance group vowed not to tar­get polling sta­tions or attack inno­cent Iraqis, say­ing the real bat­tle is against the occupiers.

In a state­ment, the Salah Al-Dine Brigades, the mil­i­tary wing of the Islamic Front for Resis­tance, said they would not be dragged into a bat­tle against their own people.

The group pledged to avoid tar­get­ing polling sta­tions or being involved in spilling the blood of inno­cent civilians.

We are keen not to harm the lives of all Iraqis regard­less of their sects and races — that is an order for the armed wing of the group to fol­low,” said the two-page statement.

We should not be dragged into side bat­tles which do not affect the true strug­gle with the enemy occupiers,”

Source Islam On Line

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Iraqi Resistance Group Says Not to Target Elections

  1. Pingback: Iraq Blog Count

  2. Mister Ghost says:

    Ladysweetie,
    Iraqi Elec­tion Pro­jected Results
    from Debka

    For elec­tions held now, Hooker projects the fol­low­ing figures:

    The Shi­ite Uni­fied Iraqi Alliance list – 43.8% = 120 national assem­bly seats.

    The Kur­dish list – a sur­pris­ing 36.4% (more than twice their 16–18% pro­por­tion of the gen­eral pop­u­la­tion) = 100 seats.

    The Iraqi National Accord – 8.1% = 22 seats. (A for­mula is being actively sought to retain him as pre­mier even if his show­ing is low.)

    The Iraqi Com­mu­nist party (the best orga­nized) – 1.6% = 5 seats.

    All the Assyr­ian, Turkomen and Yazdi minori­ties together – 4 seats.

    All the rest – 5 seats.

  3. Mister Ghost says:

    Analy­sis of Elec­tion Results by DEBKA
    The first con­clu­sion reached by our ana­lysts is that, while the lead­ing Shi­ite UIA bloc can expect to be the big win­ner of the elec­tion, the real vic­tor will be the Shi­ite cleric who assem­bled and founded the alliance, Grand Aya­tol­lah Ali Sis­tani and his inner cir­cle. The slate he drew up of can­di­dates to the leg­is­la­ture reflects his polit­i­cal aspi­ra­tions and cun­ning: of the 120 reg­is­tered, the first 60 are inde­pen­dents with no par­ties behind them and will there­fore be totally depen­dent on Sis­tani him­self for support.

    Al-Hakim’s SCIRI will get no more than 14 assem­bly seats, while al-Jafari’s al Dawa must be con­tent with 12. The for­mer rebel cleric Moq­tada Sadr’s fol­low­ing will match al Dawa with 12 places in the legislature

    The slate he assem­bled also pushes pro-Tehran and Iran’s cho­sen men down to the unre­al­is­tic bottom.

    Sis­tani wants to see non-clerical min­is­ters in the post-election gov­ern­ment but will insist on incor­po­rat­ing Islamic law as the basis of the national constitution.

    The Kurds owe their pro­jected big win to three prime causes:

    1. The union of the two prin­ci­pal lists, which will help them carry dis­tricts in which each fac­tion is frag­men­tary, like Iraq’s sec­ond largest town of Mosul and cer­tain quar­ters of Baghdad.

    2. Major con­ces­sions by Sis­tani in Kirkuk, where he endorsed the trans­fer of tens of thou­sands of Kur­dish vot­ers into the city. Qui­etly under­way at this moment is the largest demo­graphic trans­for­ma­tion in Iraq since the war began, an abrupt rever­sal of the pop­u­la­tion dis­place­ment con­ducted by Sad­dam Hus­sein. Sunni fam­i­lies are being pushed out of Kirkuk to the Sunni Tri­an­gle and replaced by incom­ing Kurds. Turkomen, Assyr­i­ans and Yazdis gnash their teeth but have not the power to inter­fere in the Kur­dish takeover of the mixed city.

    3. Another key Sis­tani con­ces­sion was his con­sent to local elec­tions tak­ing place in Kur­dish regions for a Kur­dish national assem­bly at the same time as the gen­eral elec­tion. In return, the Kur­dish lead­ers have granted Sis­tani a pow­er­ful tool of gov­ern­ment, a promise to join his Uni­fied Iraqi Bloc in a coali­tion administration.

    The Shi­ite cleric has lit­tle to fear from this alliance. He knows the Kurds are only inter­ested in expand­ing their own self-government and will there­fore not mus­cle in on the cen­tral admin­is­tra­tion with power-sharing demands. Their back­ing, how­ever, pro­vides insur­ance for sta­ble Shiite-dominated gov­ern­ment in the long term.

    The Sunni Mus­lim minor­ity can hardly be expected to sit still as the Shi­ites and Kurds split up the post-war spoils of power.

  4. roller rebwar says:

    stop fuck­ing call­ing them “resistance” !!!