Comments on: Saddam’s mental breakdown

By: The Capture, Trial and Conviction of Saddam Hussein - Another US Intelligence Farce - Signs of the Times - Mon, 06 Nov, 2006

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:32:24 +0000

[…] of Saddam’s lawyers that he was psychologically disturbed, terrified about his possible execution, urinated on himself several times during the interview and broke into tears without reason. Par for the course, I […]

By: The Capture, Trial and Conviction of Saddam Hussein - Another US Intelligence Farce - Signs of the Times - Mon, 06 Nov, 2006

Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:13:31 +0000

By: Signs of the Times - Chain - Killing Saddam - Or Someone Who Looks Him

Signs of the Times - Chain - Killing Saddam - Or Someone Who Looks Him — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 08:16:42 +0000

[...] Since that time, the trial of "Saddam" has resembled a south American soap opera more than a credible trial, with constant adjournments and outbursts from just about everyone involved in the show, not to mention the untimely and suspicious deaths of several of "Saddam's" lawyers, the murder of the only witness to Saddam's alleged mass graves, and the testimony of one of Saddam's lawyers that he was psychologically disturbed, terrified about his possible execution, urinated on himself several times during the interview and broke into tears without reason. Par for the course, I suppose, in the judicial system of a country that is entirely controlled by the psychopathic leaders of another. [...]

By: Iraqi Expat: News Round Up

Iraqi Expat: News Round Up — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:43:23 +0000

[...] News Round Up There's been a dispute going on between an Egyptian called Cipherrus and myself. Well It started between Ciph, Athena and others, and then I ended up debating with this guys who believes in a united Islamic nation, Islamic Passport and terrorism.Anyway, it started at Athena's site, then Isaac replied to him in 2 post [1, 2]. What amazes me is that he justifies terrorism in Iraq! I mean, who gave an Egyptian the right to justify anything that goes in Iraq? Can I justify terrorism in Egypt? Do I have such right? If I do, then hell, I will justify terrorism in Egypt, Jordan, Saudi, Syria; what the hell, let's justify it in all Arab and Muslim states and blow up everybody in every capital there!I wonder if his family get blown up in one these attacks, would he still justify it? Anyway, read the arguments and try to understand the mind of those who want take us back to the 7th century; it's a long story but worth it. By the way, there were few errors in my replies, but I can't edit the comments, so I didn't bother and I am sure you will get the message.Akbar had some worries regarding the misrepresentation of Sunnis in the new 55 member commission that will responsible for writing the constitution, and he is also worried about the de-baathification. Fayrouz has wrote about the commission too.I believe the Shia bloc has shown their dark side by not allocating enough seats for the Sunnis in that commission. I understand that some people, especially Shiites, are frustrated with Sunnis boycotting the elections and then demanding representation, it sounds completely unfair; but if I want this process to work and not just to prove that they were wrong in boycotting and that they got what they asked for, then I want to include them.This is not a game of who got more in the elections get to rule; this is about writing a constitution that will shape the future of Iraq; and therefore, it is imperative that people get represented properly.To be honest, I wan't worried. Let me tell you why; first, the Kurds will not let the Shia get away with religious law; second, Allawi stood up to the Shia and refused to head the commission because the Sunnis are misrepresented; and last but not least, the US will not stand by idle watching the Shiites, or anybody, messing about without doing anything. And they didn't stand idle, and the Sunnis today have welcomed Rice's call to have a great Sunni representation. I mean were would we go without the Americans, eh?So, this will be sorted out; don't worry Akbar.As for the de-baathification; well, if you know me by now, you would know how much I despise the Baathis; but, we can not persecute them just because they were Baathis. Therefore, while I fully support the de-baathification process, I believe it must be just and those who didn't commit crimes and behaved honourably should have a future in the new Iraq. It is not an easy task to separate the bad Baathis from the good Baathis; but we can not just outcast all Baathis. I don't think we can do that; even though I wish we can, I think it would be very unwise to do so.What else? Saddam lawyer said that Saddam is so afraid of execution he cries and pisses himself! Nice, eh? Way to go Ibn Sabha! (Ibn=son, Sabha is Saddam's mother) [Hat Tip: LadyBird]And another hat tip to LadyBird; Sajeda, Saddam's wife, and his daughter have bought 55% of Al Jazeera! They paid $180 million through some fake company registered in British Virgin Islands. I wonder were they got that money from! Later, I told my father about this transaction, he said; what's new? It was Saddam's channel, anyway!So, it seems like Al Jazeera which I adore so much, is going to be the official mouthpiece of Saddam and the Baathis! But seriously think about it, this is good news; I mean we don't have to put up with morons who keep defending Al Jazeera anymore.On Friday, some friends came over; we were having a drink and chatting when they mentioned the Hezbollah-Israeli clash! I was shocked and I turned the TV on to watch the news on Al Arabia, but I had to wait half an hour for their news bulletin! So, one of the guys said Al Jazeera has a news bulletin now; but I said, no way man, I am not going to watch Al Jazeera! So, I tried BBC, CNN, etc and couldn't find anything and had to check the web for details and then watched Al Arabia half an hour later. Therefore, I don't care whether Sajeda, Raghad, or even Saddam himself owns Al Jazeera, it is not a channel that I would watch anyway! [...]

By: La capture, le procès et la condamnation de Saddam Hussein – Une autre farce du renseignement américain

Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:09:32 +0000

By: The Capture, Trial and Conviction of Saddam Hussein - Another US Intelligence Farce - Signs of the Times - Mon, 06 Nov, 2006

Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:06:14 +0000

By: A Citizen Of Mosul: A micro version of Falluja

A Citizen Of Mosul: A micro version of Falluja — Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:52:05 +0000

[…] Anyone find themselves wondering about Saddam? How’s life in jail been treating him? Click here to find out […]

By: WagNews: May 22, 2005

WagNews: May 22, 2005 — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 06:18:54 +0000

[…] by Fintan Dunne,Editor, BreakForNews.comI got one response from an alternative news site, doubting our story showing that ‘Saddam’ –whom the world has only ever seen on U.S. military video/photo– is a barely passable double playing the part with all the flair of a ham actor.My correspondent pointed to the fact that ‘Saddam’ has an international team of lawyers who would surely know if such as deception was taking place.The links below show exactly why they wouldn’t know.The easiest option for the U.S. is to have the fake ‘Saddam’ go a little crazy from a combination of his demotion, incarceration, and isolation and refuse legal representation when it comes to the trial. He can represent himself –just like Slobodan Milosevich. Haughty silence in distain of the proceedings would play well. The U.S. can write punchy handouts from ‘Saddam’ for the media.Ever since Slobodan did a star turn at his trial on war crimes, having a real dictator defend himself is an embarassment the U.S./NATO crew is keen to avoid repeating. The stand-in will do fine.The following links detail some interesting facts about the credibility of the ‘Saddam on Trial’ Psyop. Read between the lines as appropriate:1/06/2005Despite circumstantial evidence that it enjoys significant funding, [Saddam’s legal] committee insists that it works for free. The committee’s lead attorney, a dignified, gray-haired Jordanian named Ziad al-Khasawneh, recently told me.. that the tsunami of last December had wiped out 20,000 U.S. soldiers whose deaths had been hidden by the Pentagon; …that Yasser Arafat had been fatally poisoned by the CIA.… that the American toll in Iraq is much higher than has been acknowledged, and that dead soldiers are routinely stripped of their valuables and identities and dumped from low-flying aircraft into the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. He said that you can go to certain places at night and see the body bags falling. He said that he knows of a goatherd who discovered the secret place in the desert where the valuables are dumped, and who has since become rich by harvesting all the watches and rings.http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200506/langewiesche http://www.iraq4allnews.dk/viewnews.php?id=86115 also here 15/05/2005 Saddam’s mental breakdownSaddam’s attorney (Khalil Al-Dulaimi) met Raghad (Saddam’s daughter) lately in Amman Jordan to inform her about Saddam’s health condition in his last meeting with him.People witnessed the meeting said that the attorney told her that Saddam was crying frightened from execution in his last meeting with him, he told her that Saddam urinated several times during the interview… Al-Dulaimi said in many occasions he cried without a reason which was very clear that he suffer from psychological disturbances and he asked repeatedly about either he will get a death conviction or he will set free.… http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2005/05/16/315/http://www.aljazeera.com/me.asp?service_ID=7873 http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/02–11-05/discussion.cgi.71.html2/10/2004Saddam lawyer’s tribe leader murdered — One foreign intelligence report cites a recent incident in which members of the al-Dulaimi tribe, previously known for their antagonism to the coalition and the new government in Iraq, shot dead a number of Islamic militants from outside Iraq, whom they believed responsible for killing a senior al-Dulaimi sheikh [Col. Sulaiman Ahmed Dulaimi, the Iraqi National Guard commander for Ramadi and Fallujah]. Although the sheikh was a senior police official and thus a ‘collaborator’, tribal elders felt that his death had to be avenged…Isn’t that interesting. That’s the same incident that the Post covered, but in such a way that you couldn’t make heads or tails out of it. At least in relationship to what it meant for the clan’s relationship to the coalition and the new government.[The Iraqi lawyer who has met ‘Saddam is Khalil al-Dulaimi] http://www.rantingprofs.com/rantingprofs/2005/week12/ See Previous Article: Liar Liar, Saddam’s Pants on Fire […]

By: JoAnn - MySpace Blog

JoAnn - MySpace Blog — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

untimely and suspicious deaths of several of "Saddam's" lawyers, the murder of the only witness to Saddam's alleged mass graves, and the testimony of one of Saddam's lawyers that he was psychologically disturbed, terrified about his possible execution, urinated on himself several times during the interview and broke into tears without reason. Par for the course, I suppose, in the judicial system of a country that is entirely controlled by the psychopathic leaders of another.