< —update—>
Read this Stop Terror Sheikhs, Muslim Academics Demand.
Last death fatwa issued on Arab writer Tunisian origin Al-Akdhar, this is what Al-Afif Al-Akdhar wrote “The Arab Obsession with Vengeance”
< —End update—->
In a previous post I said that the conflict in Iraq is not between Shiia and Sunni as many people insisted but it’s a conflict between Shiia clerics and Sunni clerics, Iraq is just an example on how religion/ religious leaders/Imams/ clerics are moving the masses in Arabic/ Islamic world.
On the comment section of the post, DaKruser said
I have to admit that sounds strange to Americans, LadyBird.
In our society, Religion is SUCH a personal thing that “Religious” leaders only represent a very small minority of those that follow them. Quite often the Pastor (cleric) of a congregation of a church will make statements that are LOUDLY disagreed with by his/her congregation. Many make a large argument that the “Right=wing Fundamentalists” have usurped the Administration of the US. That is hogwash. Even if a small few religious fundamentalists DO come to power, if they try too hard to impose their ideas, they get nowhere. Instead of a clan or tribal, or religious structure, we choose people who exemplify one we would like to be. (Truth be told, there are seldom individuals that COMPLETELY exemplify those values, because they are politicians, so we just do the best we can.)
I agree with DaKruser but as we all know, it wasn’t like this all the time in the western society, starting from the Middle Ages until the beginning of 20th century westerners were oppressed by their clerics (Priests, Pastors) and religious leaders controlled the way people thinks (explain the crusading campaigns!!) as much as Muslims/ Arabs are oppressed today by their religious leaders but for some reason(s) the situation was changed in the west, religious leaders don’t have the same influence on western society as they had before.
Westerners owe their democracy and freedom to their Free-Thinkers and philosophers who challenged the church power and starting to create the split between church vs the state and later religion vs life affaires.
People like Bach with his revolutionary successful attempt to translate the church mass into German, through his music made it available for every non-Latin speaking person to understand what exactly the Bible says.
Spinoza challenged God existence and refers the existence of things to nature mechanism and for sure many others.
In many western countries kings and emperors played a big role and helped philosophers and free-thinkers directly or indirectly in their challenge against the church for one reason because they were also interested in limiting the power of the church in the state (Germany, England!!).
Now, here comes the big question “why this challenge never happened in Arab/ Muslim world?”
The challenge is there, Arab Free-Thinkers and intellectuals challenged the mosque authority and proved that they can fight head to head against religious leaders from the beginning,
Abu-al-ala’a Al-Ma’ari (973‑1057) is a good example:
Taha Hussein, university professor and writer, Taha Hussein specialized in pre-Islamic literature, in his book “pre-Islamic poetry” insisted that many of the Quranic-mythologies can be traced back to the pre-Islam poetry, Dr. Hussein is considered to be the first who asked “why The Quran and Mohammed are unquestionable?”.
Dr Nawal Sadawi in her late book argued that Muslims kissing of the black stone in the period of Haj in Mecca is a pre-Islam pagan ritual, Dr. Sadawi fled the country after many threats and harassments by clerics and the government.
Just recently when a Bahraini Muslim woman led Muslims in gathering prayer in a mosque, I was following a debate on the internet, three clerics in one side and Dr. Ahmed Mansour on the other side, the three clerics put their case as it’s heresy that women lead Muslims in prayer, Dr Mansour a PhD in Islamic studies who lives in exile after harassments by his own government and religious leaders, accused the clerics on mixing traditions with religion, he challenged the clerics to provide a single evidence on their argument and they failed to do so.
So, after all why Arab thinkers and intellectuals didn’t succeeded in changing the Arab/ Muslim society and failed to create the separation between state and religion, social affaires and religion and strip down religious leaders from their power as their colleagues in the west.
In fact the answer is very simple and you can see it until today, Arab/ Muslim presidents and kings joined the clerics in their campaign against Arab free-thinkers to oppress them, many of the names above and others been tortured, imprisoned, killed or forced to go to exile by their own governments which by the way claim to be a secular governments.
The reason is Arab/ Muslim governments knew that clerics are the engine which runs the masses and controlling the way people thinks, to be in their side is a guarantee directly or indirectly that the regime will stay at the head of the state and survive as long as possible.
That will explain why Al-Qardawi as the head cleric in Qatar when declared a Fatwa on jihad in Iraq a year ago still holding the same position in Qatar as the grand mufti.
In Jordan is the same thing and in every Arab/ Muslim state is the same story only names and faces are changing.
I hope this will answers many questions and I hope it’s very clear to people why I am very pessimistic that Arab reform will ever be realistic.
Pingback: AraBlog reBlog
Pingback: This Fucking War: June 2005