Still waiting (update)

Update 2

Iraq delays char­ter result to ver­ify figures

Early media reports of a “yes” vic­tory in Nin­eveh, which includes the restive mixed city of Mosul, drew an angry writ­ten response from the head of the provin­cial elec­toral office.

There is no truth to these reports,” wrote Dha­her Habib al-Juburi, head of the Nin­eveh com­mis­sion, stress­ing that it would take days for the bal­lots to be prop­erly counted.

End Update 2

Update

Elaph con­firms Num­bers of Mosul vot­ers also.

State­ments com­ing from most gov­er­norates indi­cat­ing such high num­bers that require us to recheck, com­pare and audit them, as they are unusu­ally high accord­ing to the inter­na­tional stan­dards,” the Inde­pen­dent Elec­toral Com­mis­sion of Iraq said in a statement.

End Update

I asked my sis­ter if she voted or not? She answered

.

For more on the same sub­ject read Najma’s post.

A video inter­view with Yanar Mohammed, she explains why she/me/we against the con­sti­tu­tion, it would be bet­ter to name the clip:

Iraq’s con­sti­tu­tion for dum­mies.

But still there is a hope, Reuters reported

This entry was posted in POLITICS and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Still waiting (update)

  1. CMAR II says:

    LB,
    Here’s to hope that the con­sti­tu­tion will be rejected. And if it is, here’s to hope that the Amer­i­cans will have patience through another year of the con­sti­tu­tional process.

  2. Well, it’s nice to know that Iraqi vot­ers have the same com­pla­cency about vot­ing as Amer­i­can vot­ers. As my usual mantra goes, if you don’t vote, you have no right to bitch about the gov­ern­ment you get.

  3. Nadia says:

    I wish I could have voted.

    Yanar Mohammed, I agree with here views about the con­sti­tu­tion and its view about women. That is one of the rea­sons why if I had been able to vote it would have been a no. She is so right on the spot that this ref­er­en­dum have been put up as a YES= free­dom and secu­rity and NO=against free­dom and pro terrorism.

    Other para­graphs that worry me a lot are the one about fight­ing ter­ror I think its arti­cle 7.2, I am sure I have said that here before. That para­graph gives no def­i­n­i­tion of ter­ror, in my view many of the things that the police, secret ser­vice and army did under Sad­dam was ter­ror; and these same acts are being done now too, so will these acts be seen as ter­ror that must be stopped? Join­ing the war on ter­ror means putting human rights aside as we have seen and that is some­thing; I wanted us Iraqis never to have to go thru again.

    Bush is happy Iraqi is get­ting closer into becom­ing a part­ner in the war on terror.

  4. Mister Ghost says:

    Here’s the main ques­tion for me, Ladysweetie: Do you have to totally reject the Con­ti­tu­tion to make it more inclu­sive in the future for women’s rights and less of a Theo­cratic nature?

    Or can it be amended in the com­ing months to achive those results?

    If it can be amended, then it’s bet­ter to do that, than hav­ing to start the whole process all over again.

    Any ways Ladysweetie, if the Con­sti­tu­tion is rejected, then you deserve credit for being ahead of
    the rest of the Blog­ging Media, because the last time I checked the vote, it seemed over­whelm­ing in favor of rat­i­fy­ing it.

  5. Nadia says:

    Mis­ter Ghost not that you asked what I thought, but I think it is good that it can be amended.

  6. M says:

    Nadia,

    Or can it be amended in the com­ing months to achive those results?

    If it can be amended, then it’s bet­ter to do that, than hav­ing to start the whole process all over again.

    Mis­ter Ghost not that you asked what I thought, but I think it is good that it can be amended.

    Are you in agree­ment with Mr. Ghost? Just wondering.

  7. Halliburton Oil says:

    Nadia,

    Amer­ica declared their inde­pen­dence from the moth­er­land [Eng­land] in 1776. The Con­sti­tu­tion was rat­i­fied 10+ years later. Between those inter­ven­ing dates, an inspired debate took place in Amer­ica, amongst Giants. Bril­liant think­ing, peer­less writ­ing and charged dis­cus­sion was the aver­age, of the day.

    Fed­er­al­ist papers

    Anti Fed­er­al­ist papers

    United States Constitution..Bill of Rights

    States rights vs Fed­eral rights, the argu­ment is still going on..alas, sov­er­eign inde­pen­dent states rights are get­ting weaker every year..puny by comparison..sorry to say, the Giants are no longer with us..sad but true..they’re long gone, and it’s only us now.

    Nadia, No demo­c­ra­tic gov­ern­ment is ever done, it’s always a per­pet­ual work in progress…for ever­more. Have a happy debate Nadia and constitution! ;)

  8. Jon says:

    Aaron– “As my usual mantra goes, if you don’t vote, you have no right to bitch about the gov­ern­ment you get.”

    Unless, of course, your gov­ern­ment over­steps its Con­sti­tu­tional bounds.

    Nadia– “Bush is happy Iraqi is get­ting closer into becom­ing a part­ner in the war on terror.”

    Or at least happy that the US is get­ting some of that sweet, sweet crude.

    Ghost– “Do you have to totally reject the Con­ti­tu­tion to make it more inclu­sive in the future for women’s rights and less of a Theo­cratic nature?”

    Would you vote yes for a con­sti­tu­tion that failed to ade­quately pro­tect your rights?

    it’s bet­ter to do that, than hav­ing to start the whole process all over again.”

    You don’t have to restart the whole process to include addi­tional protections.

    HO– “States rights vs Fed­eral rights, the argu­ment is still going on..alas, sov­er­eign inde­pen­dent states rights are get­ting weaker every year..puny by comparison..sorry to say, the Giants are no longer with us..sad but true..they’re long gone, and it’s only us now.”

    Holy crap. He actu­ally seems to have a valid opin­ion based on facts. Crazy.

    No demo­c­ra­tic gov­ern­ment is ever done, it’s always a per­pet­ual work in progress”

    Which is how good republics are con­verted into fas­cist states.

  9. Nadia says:

    We can­not accept that there can be free demo­c­ra­tic elec­tions in a coun­try under for­eign mil­i­tary occu­pa­tion” Pres­i­dent Bush

  10. Jeff says:

    LOL!!! How soon peo­ple for­get! LOL!!!!!!!!

    Click Here!

  11. Jeff says:

    I’m sorry, I should rephrase that…

    How soon “The Stu­pid” forget…

    Click Here!!!

  12. Halliburton Oil says:


    Lol!

    I’d like to return to some roman­tic dream time, an ideal period in US his­tory. Can you imag­ine drop­ping in, let’s say for a lit­tle skir­mish­ing with the boys in the Rev war? How about meet­ing the Framers? Or spend­ing a day on the Mis­sippi with Mark?

    Abu Jon Holy crap

    We know you’re impor­tant Jon, but not that inportant.

  13. Halliburton Oil says:

    Abu Ass­hat Jon
    said; “My com­ments on this blog make a sig­nif­i­cant influ­ence” [sic] effluent.

    Abu Ass­hat Jon, here’s some home work for you» a lib­er­tar­ian imposter

  14. Halliburton Oil says:

    Abu Ass­hat Jon
    , here’s some home work for you, a lib­er­tar­ian imposter.

  15. Jon says:

    Less than 20 words in the post and after three tries you still can’t get it right. Nice. Try bang­ing on the key­board with your head some more. That might work.

  16. Keld Bach says:

    Vote Fig­ures for Cru­cial Province Don’t Add Up:

    “The early vote totals from Nin­eveh province, which sug­gested an over­whelm­ing major­ity in favour of Iraq’s draft con­sti­tu­tion that assured its pas­sage by national ref­er­en­dum, now appear to have been highly misleading.“

    When can we expect the final result, LadyBird?

  17. LadyBird says:

    Kb

    I will try to find the link again

    Update

    The link in Ara­bic is here

  18. Pingback: democracyforcalifornia.com: October 2005 Archives