<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Falluja.…again and again (update)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2005/11/08/fallujaagain-and-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2005/11/08/fallujaagain-and-again/</link>
	<description>Yet another Iraqi Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Murph</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2005/11/08/fallujaagain-and-again/comment-page-3/#comment-69088</link>
		<dc:creator>Murph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=578#comment-69088</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;This Site Is Awesome...&lt;/strong&gt;

Check out what he wrote here....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>This Site Is Awesome…</strong></p>
<p>Check out what he wrote here.…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online &#187; Breaking News</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2005/11/08/fallujaagain-and-again/comment-page-3/#comment-18668</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online &#187; Breaking News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 02:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=578#comment-18668</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] LadyBird of Baghdad Dweller, Nur al-Cubicle, thecutter of PeacePalestine and Sabbah, all write about the breaking news of the proof that the U.S. troops used Chemical Weapons in Iraq. The movie was broadcast by the Italian RAI News 24 today, and created a shock around the world about a controversy topic that was once denied by U.S. official last year. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[…] LadyBird of Baghdad Dweller, Nur al-Cubicle, thecutter of PeacePalestine and Sabbah, all write about the breaking news of the proof that the U.S. troops used Chemical Weapons in Iraq. The movie was broadcast by the Italian RAI News 24 today, and created a shock around the world about a controversy topic that was once denied by U.S. official last year. […]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2005/11/08/fallujaagain-and-again/comment-page-3/#comment-11316</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=578#comment-11316</guid>
		<description>He he,

They were on a military base looking for chemical weapons but all they found were (if I recall accurately) CS, artillery shells, high explosives, WP, etc.

Duh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He he,</p>
<p>They were on a military base looking for chemical weapons but all they found were (if I recall accurately) CS, artillery shells, high explosives, WP, etc.</p>
<p>Duh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2005/11/08/fallujaagain-and-again/comment-page-3/#comment-11315</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=578#comment-11315</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;It clearly does, you are the one that needs to read it more carefully. &quot;The team checked for contamination or chemical weapons, NO CONTAMINATION WAS FOUND, it doesn&#039;t say that no chemical weapons were found.  &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It clearly does, you are the one that needs to read it more carefully. “The team checked for contamination or chemical weapons, NO CONTAMINATION WAS FOUND, it doesn’t say that no chemical weapons were found.  </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2005/11/08/fallujaagain-and-again/comment-page-3/#comment-11313</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=578#comment-11313</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Try reading a little closer.

Suggestion to everyone: read attentively.

This link does not support the case that the US military was using a double standard in classifying WP.

I think Mike got confused because the article mentioned WP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Try reading a little closer.</p>
<p>Suggestion to everyone: read attentively.</p>
<p>This link does not support the case that the US military was using a double standard in classifying WP.</p>
<p>I think Mike got confused because the article mentioned WP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2005/11/08/fallujaagain-and-again/comment-page-3/#comment-11312</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=578#comment-11312</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Looking thru some more of these documents is fascinating. It seems Saddam&#039;s WP was classified as a chemical weapon but the US Army&#039;s WP was not. &lt;/strong&gt;
 
 
http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/postwar/postwar_s02.htm
 
However, the difference between these chemical warfare agents and other substances not classified as chemical warfare agents (e.g., white phosphorous and napalm) is largely technical and legalistic. 
 
http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/an_iii/an_nas_iii_s04.htm
 
THE SEARCH FOR CHEMICAL WEAPONS
 
A March 23, 1991, message from the 82nd Airborne Division chemical officer to the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment chemical officer summarized the search for chemical weapons at Tallil Air Base, An Nasiriyah SW ASP, and Khamisiyah:

When the 82nd Abn Div [Airborne Division] initially occupied the sector, Fox vehicles and unit   reconnaissance teams checked for evidence of contamination or chemical weapons. No           contamination was found. Riot control agent CS was found in the Tall al Lahm [Khamisiyah] ASP (PV3706).[20] White phosphorus rounds were also found. Artillery rounds with fill plugs and central bursters were found. They were marked with a yellow band. They were empty. Other rounds in the area were marked similarly. Fox reconnaissance vehicles determined they contained TNT.[21]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Looking thru some more of these documents is fascinating. It seems Saddam’s WP was classified as a chemical weapon but the US Army’s WP was not. </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/postwar/postwar_s02.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/postwar/postwar_s02.htm</a></p>
<p>However, the difference between these chemical warfare agents and other substances not classified as chemical warfare agents (e.g., white phosphorous and napalm) is largely technical and legalistic. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/an_iii/an_nas_iii_s04.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/an_iii/an_nas_iii_s04.htm</a></p>
<p>THE SEARCH FOR CHEMICAL WEAPONS</p>
<p>A March 23, 1991, message from the 82nd Airborne Division chemical officer to the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment chemical officer summarized the search for chemical weapons at Tallil Air Base, An Nasiriyah SW ASP, and Khamisiyah:</p>
<p>When the 82nd Abn Div [Airborne Division] initially occupied the sector, Fox vehicles and unit   reconnaissance teams checked for evidence of contamination or chemical weapons. No           contamination was found. Riot control agent CS was found in the Tall al Lahm [Khamisiyah] ASP (PV3706).[20] White phosphorus rounds were also found. Artillery rounds with fill plugs and central bursters were found. They were marked with a yellow band. They were empty. Other rounds in the area were marked similarly. Fox reconnaissance vehicles determined they contained TNT.[21]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2005/11/08/fallujaagain-and-again/comment-page-3/#comment-11108</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 06:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=578#comment-11108</guid>
		<description>&quot;PRobably meant your own personnel.&quot;

It says &quot;personnel targets&quot;.

&quot;Remember, our soldiers are all ignorant rednecks.&quot;

Is that what you think of our soldiers?  I always thought our guys were highly trained professionals other than the few sadistic bad apples.  That&#039;s why we have officers to keep them in line.  Then again, had one Citadel-trained platoon leader who I had to get booted out of the service because the Citadel had hazed anything resembling honor out of the guy, but that&#039;s a story for another time.  LT Underpants reminds me of this guy.

The rednecks I have referred to is the half of the electorate stupid enough to vote for someone like Bush... TWICE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“PRobably meant your own personnel.”</p>
<p>It says “personnel targets”.</p>
<p>“Remember, our soldiers are all ignorant rednecks.”</p>
<p>Is that what you think of our soldiers?  I always thought our guys were highly trained professionals other than the few sadistic bad apples.  That’s why we have officers to keep them in line.  Then again, had one Citadel-trained platoon leader who I had to get booted out of the service because the Citadel had hazed anything resembling honor out of the guy, but that’s a story for another time.  LT Underpants reminds me of this guy.</p>
<p>The rednecks I have referred to is the half of the electorate stupid enough to vote for someone like Bush… TWICE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2005/11/08/fallujaagain-and-again/comment-page-3/#comment-11100</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=578#comment-11100</guid>
		<description>against personnel?

PRobably meant your own personnel.

Remember, our soldiers are all ignorant rednecks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>against personnel?</p>
<p>PRobably meant your own personnel.</p>
<p>Remember, our soldiers are all ignorant rednecks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2005/11/08/fallujaagain-and-again/comment-page-3/#comment-11096</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=578#comment-11096</guid>
		<description>I also wanted to say.. damn I have a good memory.  And they thought I was sleeping in class.  Pshaw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also wanted to say.. damn I have a good memory.  And they thought I was sleeping in class.  Pshaw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2005/11/08/fallujaagain-and-again/comment-page-3/#comment-11095</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=578#comment-11095</guid>
		<description>I stumbled over this passage someone posted on a different blog, which is good cause I hate doing research.

&quot;(4) Burster Type White phosphorus (WP M110A2) rounds burn with intense heat and emit dense white smoke. They may be used as the initial rounds in the smokescreen to rapidly create smoke or against material targets, such as Class V sites or logistic sites. It is against the law of land warfare to employ WP against personnel targets.&quot; (&#039;Battle Book&#039; [1999 revision] of the US Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Chapter Five Part III; Section 5-11.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stumbled over this passage someone posted on a different blog, which is good cause I hate doing research.</p>
<p>“(4) Burster Type White phosphorus (WP M110A2) rounds burn with intense heat and emit dense white smoke. They may be used as the initial rounds in the smokescreen to rapidly create smoke or against material targets, such as Class V sites or logistic sites. It is against the law of land warfare to employ WP against personnel targets.” (‘Battle Book’ [1999 revision] of the US Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Chapter Five Part III; Section 5–11.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
