American raid story

It’s hap­pened to this widow with 8 chil­dren, live in a small vil­lage south of Bagh­dad, at night the raid started with big bangs and screaming.

America_raid

After the searched the house, they destroyed a civil­ian car which was the only source of income to the family.

America_raid

All women and chil­dren were locked in a room in the mosque for ten hours, when they released and came back home, they found every­thing is dam­aged and bro­ken includ­ing their copy of the Quran.

America_raid

And this is what they left behind

America_raid

Source “Iraqirabita

This entry was posted in POLITICS and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

38 Responses to American raid story

  1. Charles says:

    B.S.

    Obvi­ous fab­ri­ca­tion intended to inflame.

    I espe­cially like to token koran desecration…

  2. Charles says:

    PS

    The right hand side of the sec­ond pic­ture looks like a piece of what was left of the car. I’m not sure what the rest is. Metal bed frame? All stacked up nice and neat. Say “cheese” for the camera…

    Can you imag­ine what size explo­sion would be required to man­gle a car to such an extent? Can some­one say:

    car bomb” scraps?

    Good report­ing LB!

  3. Chuck youre an idiot. Sad youre whole like is devoted to mak­ing excuses for tor­ture and mur­der of the Iraqi peo­ple. But then I for­get youre no doubt paid to do it. Black ops and all that. Sad lil man. If you are xtain arent you wor­ried what your god of love will say to all this mur­der in his name? Or are you hop­ing to some­how buy your­self out of it ? Funny how you neo­con black ops peo­ple are all over the Iraqi blogs that dont par­rot sup­port for you, yet you are NEVER found com­ment­ing any­where else. pathetic

  4. Charles says:

    chompy,

    Chuck youre an idiot.”

    Um, ok.

    Sad youre whole like is devoted to mak­ing excuses for tor­ture and mur­der of the Iraqi people.”

    Um, our ‘like’ are the one’s who got rid of your dear dic­ta­tor and given Iraqis the chance for a free future. Nat­u­ar­ally, it will be a rocky road.

    But then I for­get youre no doubt paid to do it.”

    You are paranoid.

    Black ops and all that.”

    Delu­sional.

    If you are xtain arent you wor­ried what your god of love will say to all this mur­der in his name?”

    I wor­ship the great tur­tle. He is not inter­ested in human affairs.

    Or are you hop­ing to some­how buy your­self out of it ?”

    Um, yeah. God said he would give me a fair deal and only 2.9% APR.

    Funny how you neo­con black ops peo­ple are all over the Iraqi blogs that dont par­rot sup­port for you,”

    I just love how you get car­ried away with your para­noid delu­sions. But I must warn you: those synapses make per­ma­nent con­nec­tions as those lit­tle thoughts buzz around your head. The more often a ‘para­noid’ line of thought is pur­sued, the more estab­lished the ‘chan­nel’ becomes. Your thoughts will begin tak­ing this deviant course by default. I fear the dam­age may be is irreversible.

    yet you are NEVER found com­ment­ing any­where else. pathetic”

    Fas­ci­nat­ing inter­pre­ta­tion! So you pre­fer to stim­u­late your brain and learn about other people’s opin­ions by loi­ter­ing in some echocham­ber that regur­gi­tates your own para­noid nonsense?

    I am not surprised.

    I do par­tic­i­pate in a few other forums, and all of them are ant-US, anti-Iraq for the­most part, but I find that keep­ing track of even one is far too time con­sum­ing. I read a few dozen on a pretty reg­u­lar basis to get my news. Its true i’m lazy.

  5. M says:

    Charles,

    I want you to know I am really dis­ap­pointed; I thought you were the travel agent for Dis­ney World. Now Chom­per thinks you’re CIA, and the big boss says he’s going to lay me off cause you’re doing a bet­ter job than me, and you’re not even on the pay­roll. Thanks a lot you show off…me with 12 kids and 10 dogs to feed.

  6. Keld Bach says:

    As if we didn’t know: U.S. occu­pa­tion of Iraq bru­tal and cor­rupt:

    What the Pen­ta­gon does pro­vide is this: Up until last August, there were about 25 air strikes per month. By Novem­ber it had risen to 120. By Jan­u­ary it was 150.

    Many U.S. mil­i­tary ana­lysts and even alleged war oppo­nents like Rep. John Murtha are advo­cat­ing pulling out U.S. ground troops and increas­ing the air war. This may not enable U.S. impe­ri­al­ism to con­quer Iraq, but is cer­tain to kill lots of Iraqis.

  7. Pingback: American raid story :: from www.uruknet.info :: news from occupied Iraq - ch

  8. Pingback: American raid story :: from www.uruknet.info :: news from occupied Iraq - it

  9. Charles says:

    M,

    I’m not threat.

    M’s Boss,

    I’ll work twice as hard for half M’s pay.

    KB,

    Thanks for remind­ing us. That’s an excel­lent source for the ‘pravda’ com­rad! Did you hear that the 5-year plan for pro­duc­tion of wheat has been exceeded in NK by over 41%!

  10. Jon says:

    Charles — “I wor­ship the great turtle.”

    There is no such thing as “the Great Tur­tle”! There is only one true god and that is the Fly­ing Spaghetti Monster.

  11. Jon says:

    Speak­ing of the omnipo­tent FSMHappy Valen­tines Day every­one! :-D

  12. Rubin says:

    Charles, ROFLMAO!!

  13. Charles says:

    Jon,

    There is only one true god and that is the Fly­ing Spaghetti Monster. ”

    You just keep it up and I may have to fatwa your ass!

    You can’t wor­ship spaghetti. While you may praise pasta in its many forms due to high caloric con­tent, long shelf life, and ease of prepa­ra­tion, it should not be worshipped.

    Although it prob­a­bly can be argued that pasta has done more to ease human suf­fer­ing and pro­mote human progress than a par­tic­u­lar tur­ban wear­ing bearded fel­low who shall hence­forth remain name­less (PBUH).

  14. awww poor lil chuckie, are you get­ting upset youre lies arent believed ? You neo­cons are all the same par­rot­ing the same load of lies you always do. Youre amus­ing, but in a pathetic head up your butt kinda way. I’ll enjoy laugh­ing at you when your delu­sions of empire fail along with your econ­omy. Till then prat­tle on lil boy you can pro­vide com­edy relief as your coun­try sinks under the waves of its own incom­petancy and stupidity.

  15. Nadia says:

    KB what do you know about Daniel Pipes?

    I just read what’s at the link below and won­der what do you know about him?

    Please read Daniel Pipes

  16. Nadia says:

    KB you don’t have to answer about Daniel Pipes just did a search myself and learned that he is NOT Dan­ish as I thougt at first from the arti­cle. But if you know more about his rela­tion­ship with Flem­ing Rose please let me know.

  17. Keld Bach says:

    Nadia, I don’t know much about Pipes except that I’ve seen his name some times on the right-wing blogs. He seems to be an Islam­o­pho­bic who thinks Islam should be fought the same way as Facism.

    Flem­ming Rose from Jyllands-Posten met him in 2004 and wrote an arti­cle enti­tled “The Threat of Islamism”. Here’s it is in Eng­lish: The Daniel Pipes apolo­getic arti­cle from Flem­ming Rose/Jyllands Posten.

  18. CMAR II says:

    Charles, I find your gospel of the Great Tur­tle to be entirely cred­i­ble. I am a believer. Now let me tell you how the US gov­ern­ment engi­neered 9–11 and Pearl Har­bor, and then I’ll tell you about the free­dom fight­ers try­ing to res­cue Iraq from it’s demo­c­ra­t­i­cally elected government.

  19. Nadia says:

    Thank you KB :)

  20. Keld Bach says:

    CMAR, it would prob­a­bly sound sim­i­lar to this: Eye­wit­ness to U.S. War Crimes in Iraq:

    The infra­struc­ture is in total sham­bles. Women now, if they even leave their homes, bet­ter go out with an abaya – a face cover — and cer­tainly a hijab. Unemployment’s over 50 per­cent, the med­ical system’s in total sham­bles. Ambu­lances and med­ical work­ers and hos­pi­tals them­selves are being tar­geted by the U.S. mil­i­tary. It’s their stan­dard oper­at­ing pro­ce­dure now, in com­bat zones, to tar­get the med­ical infra­struc­ture. Col­lec­tive pun­ish­ment is now stan­dard oper­at­ing pro­ce­dure. In Haditha, Fal­lu­jah, Al Qaim, Ramadi, Samarra, Saniya, just to name a few off the top of my head, the stan­dard pol­icy is: if the U.S. is get­ting attacked a lot in the area, cut the water and elec­tric­ity to the city, pro­hibit med­ical sup­plies from going in or out of the city, and use snipers quite often to delib­er­ately tar­get any­thing that moves in the city at cer­tain times, impose cur­fews – this is the stan­dard pro­ce­dure now. Now it’s com­mon. It first started in Fal­lu­jah where peo­ple started describ­ing their city as a con­cen­tra­tion camp or a “big jail” after the U.S. siege and the “secu­rity mea­sures” then imposed on the city by the U.S. military.

  21. M says:

    ” Till then prat­tle on lil boy you can pro­vide com­edy relief as your coun­try sinks under the waves of its own incom­petancy and stupidity. ”

    Chom­per, can you say HARPER. What an idiot. Don’t you have a class to go to or something?

  22. Keld Bach says:

    Pepe Esco­bar in the Asia Times Online: Good­bye Iraq, hello Afghanistan:

    The White House/Pentagon pol­icy is now a “back to the future” of turn­ing Iraq into Afghanistan, where war­lords, reli­gious or sec­u­lar, and tribal sheikhs defend their mini-states armed to their teeth, and crim­i­nal gangs run par­al­lel to death squads. There isn’t a remote pos­si­bil­ity of forg­ing a gov­ern­ment of national unity under these circumstances.

    Which suits Wash­ing­ton fine. The only way for the United States to pro­long its Iraqi adven­ture is to per­pet­u­ate chaos; Iraq as the new Afghanistan. Few dis­pute that the US invaded Iraq for its oil resources, mostly untapped, and that it’s located in the heart of the world’s energy sys­tem. Thus, if the US con­trols Iraq, it extends its strate­gic power.

  23. Charles says:

    Inter­est­ing how this pun­dit implies that the US cre­ated these fas­ci­na­tiong traits within Afghan social/political cul­ture — and how the US pol­icy is to cre­ate the same in Iraq.

    There isn’t a remote pos­si­bil­ity of forg­ing a gov­ern­ment of national unity under these circumstances.

    And this pun­dit sug­gests? Author­i­tar­ian crack­down? Sad­dam kept things in check through oppres­sion. Of course his peo­ple are the one’s behind the cur­rent may­hem — but that’s not the point.

    The point is this is a neo-con/zionist plot. Am I right?

    Which suits Wash­ing­ton fine.

    Sure. Its a god damned party over there.

    The only way for the United States to pro­long its Iraqi adven­ture is to per­pet­u­ate chaos;

    Hmmmm. But if there is chaos, we are hardly con­trol­ling things. Please make up your mind.

    Thus, if the US con­trols Iraq, it extends its strate­gic power.

    This dumdit fails to con­nect his own points. If Iraq becomes like Afghanistan, or worse, then we would not be con­trol­ling the coun­try. We would not have sta­bil­ity for investment/development required to exploit the very resources he is claim­ing we want.

    KB, you must have to dig through a lot of garbage to find these opinions…

  24. Keld Bach says:

    Charles, it’s always a tough job to find the nee­dle in the haystack:

    Inca­pable of con­trol­ling any­thing, not even the road from Baghdad’s air­port to the Green Zone, and inca­pable of recon­struct­ing what it has destroyed, Wash­ing­ton for its part will keep bet­ting on chaos, retreat­ing behind the huge con­crete bar­ri­ers that dot the waste­land of its prized Mus­lim pos­ses­sions, Afghanistan and Iraq.

    But as we all know, they get a hand from their friends in AQ ;-)

  25. Charles says:

    But as we all know, they get a hand from their friends in AQ

    Who get their help from you and LB. Its all one big cir­cle of love.

  26. Keld Bach says:

    I would love to give the Amer­i­cans a hand too — to escort them out of Iraq ;-)

  27. Keld Bach says:

    More pho­tographs have been leaked of Iraqi cit­i­zens tor­tured by US sol­diers at the noto­ri­ous Abu Ghraib prison dur­ing ‘Oper­a­tion Iraqi Freedom’.

  28. Charles says:

    KB,

    The pics are ter­ri­ble. But its hard to say what they really are. Some of the demor­al­iza­tion tech­niques we have seen before — get them naked, humil­i­ate them, etc., to break them before inter­ro­ga­tion. Peo­ple caught plant­ing road­side bombs on pedes­trian streets have NO claims to white glove treat­ment. The prob­lem is we don’t know any­thing about these peo­ple or their cir­cum­stances. While a lot of peo­ple (50,000+ ?) went through the prison, there is no rea­son to assume that more than a few were treated this way. You can read plenty of accounts about how the insur­gents don’t really mind get­ting cap­tured by amer­i­cans (as opposed to Iraqis) because the pros­e­cu­tion sys­tem is so inef­fi­cient, most are back on the street after some weeks.

    But some of the bloody pics cer­tainly need explain­ing. We know there were riots at the prison. Were some of the wounds (like buck­shot in the ass — if that is what it is) inflicted while putting down the riot? Head bruises? Looks like one guy was try­ing to head butt the steel door with obvi­ous consequences…

    There have been tri­als and I think many of the sol­diers who really abused pris­on­ers are in jail. There are plenty of peo­ple rot­ting in abu gharaib who deserve far worse than these peo­ple ever got.

    The US is going to catch more shit for this to be sure. Some of it is deserved. But not all.

  29. Jon says:

    Charles — “You can’t wor­ship spaghetti.”

    Hey… 3.2 bil­lion (guesstimated/randomly selected numer­i­cal fig­ure) Pasta­far­i­ans can’t be wrong!

  30. Keld Bach says:

    You’re very good at down­play­ing what you don’t like, Charles: “While a lot of peo­ple (50,000+ ?) went through the prison, there is no rea­son to assume that more than a few were treated this way.”

    There have been tri­als and I think many of the sol­diers who really abused pris­on­ers are in jail.”

    It’s not just a few bad apples — and the abuses are still going on. I would like to see peo­ple like Rums­feld and Geof­frey Miller being pros­e­cuted for these crimes. They are no bet­ter than Sad­dam and his sons.

    BTW, I won­der if this infor­ma­tion is cred­i­ble: LIST of CIA Tor­ture Planes, Culprits—Here’s PROOF that EU DENIES.

  31. Keld Bach says:

    Karen But­ton: Who Will Pos­sess Iraq’s Oil­fields?:

    In Crude Designs, a report pub­lished by the UK-based non-governmental organ­i­sa­tion Plat­form and the US’s Global Pol­icy Insti­tute, oil ana­lyst Greg Mut­titt says if cur­rent plans are approved, Iraqi’s will “lose con­trol of more than 85 per­cent of their oil resources to for­eign multi­na­tion­als.“

  32. Charles says:

    KB,

    It’s not just a few bad apples — and the abuses are still going on.

    I highly doubt it. In any case you wouldn’t know a thing about it. You just made that up. Funny how these newly released pics show the same perps as pre­vi­ous pics (who are now serv­ing jail time).

    After the ini­tial scan­dal, you can be sure that US troops have been very care­ful because in the end — it hurts them. There may be the odd angy sadist in the mix, but you can bet that the non­coms and offi­cers — and even fel­low sol­diers — would come down hard on any more of this BS.

    I would like to see peo­ple like Rums­feld and Geof­frey Miller being pros­e­cuted for these crimes. They are no bet­ter than Sad­dam and his sons.”

    Sounds a bit extreme KB. Not like you at all!

    My per­sonal opin­ion is that the whole abu gharaib thing was blown out of pro­por­tion. Much of what hap­pened is rep­re­hen­si­ble — and crim­i­nal. But the idea that the whole prison was run like that, and that thou­sands suf­fered is not sup­ported by any evi­dence. It really was a few bad apples under inex­cus­ably poor management.

    Many of the pics are actual proof that US sol­diers are care­ful, and doc­u­ment instances of bruises, bumps, deaths, and shot­gun pel­lets to the ass, because all of these instances are inves­ti­gated internally.

    On the one hand you want to pre­tend that highly trained, mur­der­ous US intel offi­cers glee­fully inflict sadis­tic tor­tures on inno­cent Iraqis by the thou­sands as a pol­icy of the US gov­ern­ment. On the other hand, we saw quite clearly that dear Lyn­die and her com­rades were no rocket scientists.

    The peo­ple that our highly trained intel offi­cers sub­ject to coer­cive intero­ga­tions are prob­a­bly quite deserv­ing of it.

  33. Keld Bach says:

    Charles, as I said ear­lier: you’re very good at down­play­ing what you don’t like!

    Update your­self, please: The Tor­ture Ques­tion.

  34. Charles says:

    KB,

    Inter­est­ing link, but there is noth­ing in it that sup­ports the use of sys­tem­atic tor­ture on detainees.

    Cer­tainly the US wanted to use aggres­sive intero­ga­tion tech­niques against ter­ror sus­pects in order to gather info, break cells, and stop future acts of terrorism.

    Cer­tainly ille­gal com­bat­ants ARE NOT cov­ered by Geneva. You may WISH they were cov­ered, but Geneva is quite spe­cific in who it cov­ers and this is delib­er­ate. Geneva delib­er­ately does not pro­tect ille­gal com­bat­ants. We have been through this and it is writ­ten in black and white.

    Just because the US con­firmed that it is not bound by Geneva regard­ing ille­gal com­bat­ants, it doesn’t nec­es­sar­ily fol­low that peo­ple were tor­tured as a policy.

    This is an inter­est­ing debate topic for Geneva and per­haps it should be dis­cussed, voted on, and reg­u­lated. If this were to hap­pen, I doubt the ter­ror­ists would come off bet­ter. The rules of per­mis­si­ble inter­ro­ga­tion tech­niques would become less ambigu­ous though.

    It is a much more rea­son­able assess­ment that due to the nature of the con­flict, vague rules, poor man­age­ment, etc., that a few poorly con­trolled sol­diers went overboard.

    I don’t think that delib­er­ately mak­ing a ter­ror­ist physically/emotionally uncom­fort­able is the same as torture.

    Rough treat­ment is not torture.

    Beat­ing to a pulp, inflict­ing sadis­tic phys­i­cal damage/pain (drills, elec­tric­ity, burn­ing, etc.), killing, etc. is tor­ture and should not be tol­er­ated. Any­one involved in this type of activ­ity should be prosecuted.

    Caveat:

    Senior AQ lead­ers, if caught, should be intero­gated using any means that are pro­fes­sion­ally deemed as effec­tive. If this means good cop/bad cop and shar­ing tea and crum­pets, that’s fine. If it means tor­tur­ing in the real sense because it works, that’s fine too. But I don’t think phys­i­cal pain should be admin­is­tered just for the sadis­tic plea­sure of it. There may be some jus­tice in mak­ing them suf­fer, but I think a 9mm dou­ble tap is even more than they are worth (the cost of the bul­lets I mean).

  35. Keld Bach says:

    Charles, “Inter­est­ing link, but there is noth­ing in it that sup­ports the use of sys­tem­atic tor­ture on detainees.”

    You can’t pos­si­bly have read through all the links then… or watched the video clips. “sys­tem­atic tor­ture” might not the cor­rect term, though. Make it bru­tal and humil­i­at­ing inter­ro­ga­tion tech­niques instead.

  36. Keld Bach says:

    Here’s some more for you, Charles. Accord­ing to The Inde­pen­dent, we have only seen a small por­tion of the material:

    · 1,325 images of sus­pected detainee abuse
    · 93 video files of sus­pected detainee abuse
    · 660 images of adult pornog­ra­phy
    · 546 images of sus­pected dead Iraqi detainees
    · 29 images of sol­diers in sim­u­lated sex­ual acts

  37. Keld Bach says:

    Democ­racy Now: Pro­fes­sor McCoy Exposes the His­tory of CIA Inter­ro­ga­tion, From the Cold War to the War on Ter­ror:

    We now take a look at what lies behind the shock­ing images of tor­ture at Abu Ghraib by turn­ing to the his­tory of the CIA and tor­ture tech­niques. The Inter­na­tional Com­mit­tee of the Red Cross, Amnesty Inter­na­tional and other human rights groups say the recently released images of abuse of Iraqi pris­on­ers at Abu Ghraib show a clear vio­la­tion of inter­na­tional human­i­tar­ian law. The U.S. made a pledge against tor­ture when Con­gress rat­i­fied the UN Con­ven­tion Against Tor­ture in 1994 — but it was rat­i­fied with reser­va­tions that exempted the CIA’s psy­cho­log­i­cal tor­ture method. So what were the results?
    A new expose gives an account of the CIA’s secret efforts to develop new forms of tor­ture span­ning fifty years. It reveals how the CIA per­fected its meth­ods, dis­trib­ut­ing them across the world from Viet­nam to Iran to Cen­tral Amer­ica, uncov­er­ing the roots of the Abu Ghraib and Guan­tanamo tor­ture scan­dals. The book is titled “A Ques­tion of Tor­ture: CIA Inter­ro­ga­tion, From the Cold War to the War on Terror.“

  38. Pingback: American raid story :: from www.uruknet.info :: news from occupied Iraq - it