“Allah” Banned from “Yahoo”

Posted on February 22, 2006 by Sappho

no_allah

I linked before to the lat­est Fisk’s arti­cle (

Yahoo! is ban­ning the use of allah in email names — even if the let­ters are included within another name. (The Reg­is­ter).

I per­son­ally don’t have an account on Yahoo, so I made my own exper­i­ment to see what the names are allowed by Yahoo ID.

So these are the names:

shiton_Muslims

Muslims_arepigs

Islam_isshit

This is a list of what allowed and what’s not: Is Yahoo ban­ning Allah?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to “Allah” Banned from “Yahoo”

  1. Nadia says:
    February 23, 2006 at 15:48

    “I wouldn’t want to sup­port a com­pany that has rules like that,” she said. “It doesn’t help any­body in our world right now.”

    Sean is so right.

  2. G says:
    March 11, 2006 at 12:07

    That is very bad, but do you know for a fact that they have banned Allah? Some of us are to quick to jump to con­clu­sions, If were you I would get some evi­dence to back up your claim and the if it is true, you should raise a big­ger stink than this over it. I tell you what, if you find some hard evi­dence that they are “ban­ning Allah”, then pub­lish it, I tell you will have my back­ing totally and I will 100% sup­port a boy­cott of Yahoo. Until then please every­one stop try­ing to cause prob­lems, we have enough of that in our world today.

  3. G says:
    March 11, 2006 at 12:12

    Oh, one more thing, this “war on ter­ror”, is not “war on Mus­lims”. Do you enjoy things in your coun­try get­ting blown up, and killing thou­sands of peo­ple? I know I sure do not. It hurts when Ter­ror­ists stike civil­ian tar­getsm, and thats what they do. Please stop try­ing to cause plrob­lems, we can all get along, but first we have to stop those who do not care about or want peace.

  4. nora says:
    March 14, 2006 at 22:25

    About time to stand against the source of ter­ror­ism… which is the koran and allah.
    They call allah before they slaugh­ter peo­ple in Iraq, or com­mit an attack on innocents.

  5. Truth About Iraqis says:
    March 15, 2006 at 04:08

    Hey nora,

    How did they call Allah? Was it on a cell phone, or Skype?

    Here, Nora, your real edu­ca­tion begins:

    From Reuters:

    Out­spo­ken US Chris­t­ian evan­gel­i­cal broad­caster Pat Robert­son has accused Mus­lims of plan­ning world dom­i­na­tion, and said some were “satanic” …

    These peo­ple are crazed fanat­ics, and I want to say it now: I believe it’s moti­vated by demonic power. It is satanic and it’s time we rec­og­nize what we’re deal­ing with”.

    He went on to say that “Islam is not a reli­gion of peace”, and “the goal of Islam, ladies and gen­tle­men whether you like it or not, is world domination”.

    Mr Robert­son said in a state­ment later he was refer­ring specif­i­cally to ter­ror­ists as being moti­vated by Satan …

    Con­sider the state­ments of this man of God when review­ing the news today that 87 more bod­ies, bound and exe­cuted were found in Shia and Sunni dis­tricts of the city.

    Now add his com­ments to oth­ers, like these:

    “You could almost split the Amer­i­cans into two groups: ones who were com­plete cru­saders, intent on killing Iraqis, and the oth­ers who were in Iraq because the Army was going to pay their col­lege fees. They had no under­stand­ing or inter­est in the Arab cul­ture. The Amer­i­cans would talk to the Iraqis as if they were stu­pid and these weren’t iso­lated cases, this was from the top down.” (British Spe­cial Air Service’s counter-terrorist Ben Grif­fin in The Telegraph)