Samarra_Sunni

Update: There was one small mis­take in the trans­la­tion, the time line says 6,41 should be 6,45, that’s all.

I want the read­ers to know that for Samarra inhab­i­tants, the mosques doesn’t rep­re­sents a Shiia shrines only but rep­re­sents the exis­tence of the city also and they are very proud of them, even when the sit­u­a­tion went very bad between Sunni and Shiia, Shiia pil­grim­ages to city never attacked by any group, it’s kind of unwrit­ten code of honor.

Tes­ti­monies of two eye­wit­nesses near the bombed Dome:

Wit­ness 1:

I live in a dis­trict very near to the mosque and I will tell you exactly what I saw hours before the bombing.

There is a daily cur­few in our city (Samarra) starts from 8,00 in the evening until 6,00 in the morn­ing, in the night before the bomb­ing and just when it’s get­ting dark there was unusual activ­i­ties by the ING in the area around the mosque, I heard their cars the whole night until next day in the morning.

The Mosque Guards tes­ti­mony says: Four peo­ple with ING uni­forms blind folded them and set the bombs.

The wit­ness con­tin­ues, so ask I you how could the ter­ror­ists enter the area which is usu­ally sur­rounded by the ING and enter the mosque then run­way with­out being got by the police?.

Wit­ness 2:

Wit­ness 2 gives more detailed infor­ma­tion and the Amer­i­cans con­nec­tion to the events before the bomb­ing, so I made it as time­line of the events.

My name is Muham­mad Al-Samarrai, I own an internet-cafe near the mosque, I sleep in my shop because I am worry about my com­put­ers from thieves.

8,30 (evening) joint forces of Iraqi ING and Amer­i­cans asked me to stay in the shop and don’t leave the area.

9,00 (evening) they left the area.

11,00 (evening) they came back and started to patrol the area until the morning.

6,00 (next day morn­ing) ING leave the area .

6,30 Amer­i­cans leave the area .

6,40 first explosion.

6,45 sec­ond explosion.

He con­firmed again that the cur­few starts at 8,00 (evening) until next day 6,00 (morn­ing), INGs and the Amer­i­cans will sur­round and patrol the city all that time.

103 Comments

  1. Very inter­est­ing, LB. I would like to post it on Newsvine too, if you don’t mind? You’ll get full credit, of course ;-)

  2. BTW, why don’t you do it your­self? I’ll just seed it then ;-)

  3. I posted it on newsvine

  4. Newsvine is just as easy as WP — but nev­er­mind, LB, I’ll do it ;-)

    Just saw this one: Dozens Slain in Iraq Sec­tar­ian Vio­lence:

    Gun­men shot dead 47 civil­ians and left their bod­ies in a ditch near Bagh­dad Thurs­day as mili­tia bat­tles and sec­tar­ian reprisals fol­lowed the bomb­ing of a sacred Shi­ite shrine. Sunni Arabs sus­pended their par­tic­i­pa­tion in talks on a new government.

    The hard­line Sunni Cler­i­cal Asso­ci­a­tion of Mus­lim Schol­ars said 168 Sunni mosques had been attacked, 10 imams killed and 15 abducted since the shrine attack. The Inte­rior Min­istry said it could only con­firm fig­ures for Bagh­dad, where 90 mosques were attacked in Bagh­dad, one cleric was killed, and one abducted.

    Offi­cials said at least 110 peo­ple had been killed across the coun­try in vio­lence believed trig­gered by the mosque attack.

    Three jour­nal­ists work­ing for Al-Arabiya tele­vi­sion were found dead in Samarra, the site of Wednesday’s Askariya mosque attack. Al-Arabiya is viewed in Iraq as favor­ing the United States.

    Looks pretty bad, I think.

  5. OK, I didn’t see your last comment ;-)

  6. I have the “Sunni Cler­i­cal Asso­ci­a­tion of Mus­lim Schol­ars” let­ter in Ara­bic I will trans­late it later

  7. Your arti­cle looks great at Newsvine, but maybe you should add a few more tags like sunni, shiia, samarra, etc. — then more peo­ple will find it.

    NB: please notice that they have cho­sen me as one of today’s Fea­tured Writes in the cat­e­gory ‘Pol­i­tics’ — I’m so proud ;-)

  8. Done

  9. Now I am confused–yesterday ‘some­one’ said the US did this because Sam­mara was inac­ce­si­ble to them, but today we learn they are doing patrols around the shrine of all places and used those patrols to divert atten­tion from the four ING sabo­teurs who didn’t even bother to go under dis­guise into the area which was so hos­tile that it was inac­ce­si­ble. They apa­prently spent hours in a most hosi­tle area with­out draw­ing the atten­tion of the pop­u­la­tion which the day before pre­vented them from enter­ing the city lim­its. I know logic doesn’t have a lot of value when it intrudes upon desired ver­sions of events, but can’t you do bet­ter than this? If this was actu­ally a ‘secret’ US mis­sion, don’t you think they could do bet­ter than patrols in an inac­ce­si­ble area using uni­formed bombers tak­ing hours to accom­plish the deed? This ver­sion is about as sub­tle as 500lb bombs from a B52 doing vic­tory rolls over the rub­ble. You have to at least make it seem a lit­tle more secre­tive if you want it to be believ­able. Well, maybe not to your with your tar­get audi­ence. They are will­ing to believe any­thing that does not con­front the hatred they have for one another–better to direct it elsewhere.

  10. Easy to explain, inac­ces­si­ble, doesn’t mean the US can’t enter the city, they can enter the city sur­rounded by hun­dreds of Iraqi ING dur­ing the cur­few time in the night while it’s dark but they don’t have a base inside the city or rep­re­sen­ta­tives or any­thing, the near­est Amer­i­can “base” to samarra is few kilo­me­ters out­side the city and they can’t say any­thing about how and who run the city.

    Remem­ber, these activ­i­ties like patrolling the city, US sol­dier can’t do dur­ing a nor­mal day­light, in day­light they are out­side the city set­ting roads checkpoints.

  11. This is a great pic­ture. It brought tears to my eyes. Life here becomes incred­i­bly hard and ter­ri­ble. I wish this was a night­mare and we all wake up and for­get about it. but it is not. it is real­lity that there are cer­tain peo­ple are try­ing to drag Iraq into a civil war. May God help us all!

  12. LB,

    A typ­i­cal provoca­tive, uncor­rob­o­rated, con­tra­dic­tory, illog­i­cal post designed to push peo­ple over the edge towards violence.

    You will do any­thing to under­mine stability.

    This event will either be a com­ing together as peo­ple pull back from the cliffs edge in hor­ror — or it will be the provo­ca­tion that sends peo­ple head­long over the top.

    If there are any voices of mod­er­a­tion that have yet to speak, now is the time. There are obvi­ously pow­er­ful, orga­nized forces behind this but their force is rel­a­tive. Even if there are 500,000 rad­i­cals hell bent on mur­der and may­hem, don’t let them decide for the other 24,500,000.

    Watch the state­ments and most impor­tantly the actions of your var­i­ous lead­ers. Any­one esca­lat­ing ten­sions should be crossed off your list, and you should rally behind who­ever pushes hard­est for calm. Just make it through this cri­sis, let tem­pers sub­side. The peo­ple behind this are delib­er­ately try­ing to inflame pas­sions because they know peo­ple will be eas­ier to manipulate.

  13. LB,

    My mis­take. The sec­ond part of my mes­sage wasn’t directed at you. I know you are not really a ‘bagh­dad dweller.’

    The lead­ers ‘on the back of US tanks’ were elected by the Iraqi people.

    You have made it clear plenty of times that you don’t con­sider Iraqis who actu­ally live in Iraq as ‘reg­u­lar’ Iraqis. You think that you and Nadia liv­ing in north­ern Europe are the true Iraqis.

  14. What the hell are you talk­ing about???

    You have made it clear plenty of times that you don’t con­sider Iraqis who actu­ally live in Iraq as ‘reg­u­lar’ Iraqis.

  15. LB,

    To quote:

    Doesn’t mat­ter who is the new PM, they are all pup­pets and reg­u­lar Iraqis are not inter­ested in who is the new PM.

    I’m not sure how you define ‘reg­u­lar.’ Since the vast major­ity of true Iraqis turned out to vote in both par­lia­men­tary elec­tions, you are both quan­ti­ta­tively and qual­i­ta­tively incor­rect. This shouldn’t sur­prise any objec­tive observer of your blog.

    You did not vote because you don’t give a damn. Reg­u­lar Iraqis do not share your con­tempt for their country.

    You then tried to prove your claim by link­ing to some arti­cle that shows that petro­leum pro­duc­tion, etc., is down. All that proves is that the ter­ror­ists who you seem to con­sider to be ‘reg­u­lar’ Iraqis, have been quite suc­cess­ful in destroy­ing THEIR OWN COUNTRY’s infra­struc­ture, and cre­at­ing a cli­mate of inse­cu­rity that stops devel­op­ment projects and invest­ment. Congrats!

    That being said, the very same link you pro­vided shows that gen­eral elec­tric­ity pro­duc­tion per capita is up between 25–125% depend­ing upon region.

    The link clearly shows that the vast major­ity of reg­u­lar Iraqis sup­port the elec­tion, and con­sider the results legitimate.

  16. @ALL

    Who is gain­ing any­thing from this crim­i­nal act of sabotage ?

    The Sun­nis ? No def­i­nitely not. They want to defeat the US occu­pa­tion and the ING col­lab­o­ra­tors not Shi’ite shrines.

    The Shi’ites ? Maybe but when than the Shia ING col­lab­o­ra­tors — in order to make to cre­ate civil war for their US mas­ter — so that they keep stay­ing in Iraq. Cause with­out civil war the US has no fake rea­son left to stay in Iraq.

    The Iran­ian Secret Ser­vice ? Pos­si­ble, as it might be pos­si­ble that Iran wants to incite more Shias to go after US and col­lab­o­raters in Iraq. But Iran def­i­nitely does not need to do this by bomb­ing Shia mosques, where­fore it is very unlikely Iran is behind it.
    Iran sim­ply could order its agent Sis­tani to pro­claim, that the US has to leave Iraq, or Shias will start Jihad against the US kuf­fars. That would be enough to start large Shia resis­tance against the US and the UK forces in Iraq, so no need for the Ira­ni­ans to do Mosque-bombing.

    US spe­cial forces in under­cover mis­sion ? Also pos­si­ble but not likely as they have oth­ers to do the crim­i­nal job.

    The US CIAda Organ­i­sa­tion in Iraq/Mossad and its jerks the kur­dish pesh­mer­gas ? Also likely, but of cause not Israeli agents because they have their Iraqi ING stooges (kur­dish pesh­mer­gas) to do the trick.
    The USraelis most ben­e­fit from the crim­i­nal bomb­ing — as civil war gives them a rea­son to fur­ther stay in Iraq and exploit the coun­try. Civil war between Sun­nis and Shias would weaken the Shias as well as the Sun­nis, who both hate the US and the Israelis. While the kurds for their part are also ben­e­fit­ing from it, as they are against both the Shia and the Sun­nis and do sup­port, as well as get sup­ported by the Usraelis.

    So finally it boils down to these suspects:

    Most prob­a­bly

    1.) Kur­dish ING forces instructed by the Iraqi Inte­ri­ory Mossad Ministry

    or

    2.) US spe­cial forces in under­cover mis­sion ( unlikely as stated above)

    What do you say ?

  17. IED­wins, your analy­sis sounds quite rea­son­able to me. I didn’t think of the Kurds in that con­nec­tion, but it’s obvi­ous to me that any­thing that can pro­vide the US with a good rea­son for stay­ing on, is highly appre­ci­ated. And of course, Israel ben­e­fits greatly, too — espe­cially if they are going to attack Iran later this year.

  18. IED,

    It seems you are in the habit of look­ing at words but not read­ing them.

    When I read the words: “Cause with­out civil war the US has no fake rea­son left to stay in Iraq”, I actu­ally think about them. What does it mean? What assump­tions are being made? Do those assump­tions make any sense? Do they con­tra­dict any other assumptions?

    To begin with, the US has been in Iraq for about 3 years and there has not been a civil war. A civil war is obvi­ously not a nec­es­sary con­di­tion for US troops to be in the country.

    Sec­ond, how would the US ben­e­fit from a civil war? You are prob­a­bly one of those con­vinced that the US is in Iraq to steal resources. But how can that be done effi­ciently in the mid­dle of a war when the pipelines are being sab­o­taged, and bil­lions are being spent (more than the value of the oil), and peo­ple are dying?

    Think before you write.

  19. =( this is me today =(

  20. Nadia I am at my work right now, can’t use the Inter­net for too long time (I am very busy), but I hope every­thing is fine and noth­ing happened.

    I will check your answer when I go back home

  21. Omar Ali Grant

    Hel­low,
    I am a Shia scholar liv­ing in Lon­don, but I stud­ied in Iraq in the first year after the inva­sion by the US. Indeed the Imam in the pic­ture is Suunni, his name is Ahmad Abdul ghafour Samar­rai. He is a native of Samarra, his PHd the­sis is on the Imams of the Prophet’s fam­ily, includ­ing the two buried in Samarra. he is the Mufti, or high­est rank­ing Sunni Scholar ofI­raq, and Imam in the Umm al Qurra mosque in Bagh­dad, pres­i­dent of the Asso­ci­a­tion of Sunni Ulama, a staunch defender of the insur­gence though. So the fault lines are a bit complicated…

  22. Obvi­ously Amer­i­cans did this. That way a sec­tar­ian civil war can break out with our troops in the mid­dle. The tons of blood and dol­lars spent to build a Demo­c­ra­tic Iraq can then go down the tubes in an orgy of Mus­lim against Mus­lim fight­ing and Amer­i­can influ­ence in the region will all but be destroyed. Sure pal, makes sense to me. Cer­tainly Iran, Sadr (same thing), or Al Qaeda have noth­ing to gain by a civil war but the ben­e­fits to the US are numer­ous and great.

  23. POLITICAL ESSAYS
    The Dec­la­ra­tion Of War — Part 2


    Thurs­day, Feb­ru­ary 23, 2006
    Asso­ci­ated Press [1]
    Mosque Bomb­ing an ‘Evil Act,’ Bush
    Says

    ”…speak­ing at a polit­i­cal fund–
    raiser in Indi­ana, Bush at first
    appeared to blame al-Qaida for the
    bomb­ing, and then empha­sized that
    it is unknown who was responsible.

    ‘You want to know how tough al–
    Qaida is, just look at _ we don’t
    know exactly who did the bomb­ing
    .…’”

    The Liar finally gave up on his
    “al-Qaida” BS. Gee, wow.

    So The Liar replaced one lie with
    another: the cow­ardly “we don’t
    know” lie.

    Don’t worry, The Super­power knows
    the Shi’i mosque bomb­ing –in a
    Sunni area north of Bagh­dad– is
    a well-planned fol­lowup to Iran’s
    ear­lier dec­la­ra­tion of war.

    Ear­lier dec­la­ra­tion of war?


    Excerpts from Part 1 [2]–

    Fri­day, Feb­ru­ary 17, 2006
    Reuters
    Iran calls on UK troops to pull
    out of Basra

    Reuters quotes Manouchehr Mot–
    taki, the for­eign min­is­ter of
    Iran:

    “The Islamic Repub­lic of Iran
    demands the imme­di­ate with­drawal
    of British forces from Basra.“

    Basra’s in a nar­row strip of
    Iraq –squeezed between Iran and
    Kuwait– that reaches the Per–
    sian Gulf.


    OK, back to Iran’s fol­lowup.

    From Iraqi Resis­tance Report for
    events of Wednes­day, 22 Feb­ru­ary
    2006 [3]:

    “The For­eign Rela­tions Depart­ment
    of the Iraq Regional Com­mand of
    the Arab Baath Social­ist Party
    issued a state­ment on Wednes­day
    denounc­ing the crim­i­nal attack on
    the tomb of the Imam ‘Ali al-Hadi
    and say­ing that the pro-Iranian
    Badr Brigades and the US were be–
    hind the attack.“

    [Don’t con­fuse Badr with Sadr.

    The Brigades (or Corps) are the
    mil­i­tary arm of the Supreme Coun–
    cil for the Islamic Rev­o­lu­tion in
    Iraq (SCIRI) head­quar­tered in, not
    Iraq, but in Teheran, the cap­i­tal
    of Iran.

    The Brigades fought along­side The
    Super­power troops invad­ing Iraq.

    Baath –notice, two “a“s– means
    res­ur­rec­tion (of inde­pen­dence).]

    “The Baath Party state­ment ex–
    plained:

    “The sys­tem­atic esca­la­tion of
    dif­fer­ences between Amer­ica and
    Iran have found their main poli–
    tical arena to be Iraq, because
    the most impor­tant group of agents
    of Iran are there;

    they are in power [= the pup­pet
    gov­ern­ment set up by The Super–
    power] and are able thereby to use
    the blood of Iraqis…to exert
    pres­sure on Amer­ica.

    “Iran has laid out a plan to em–
    broil Amer­ica in the Iraqi morass
    to pre­vent it from obstruct­ing
    Iran’s nuclear plans.

    “Par­tic­u­larly since Amer­ica is
    eager to move on to com­plet­ing
    arrange­ments for a with­drawal
    from Iraq, a part of which is the
    sign­ing of bind­ing agree­ments on
    oil and strat­egy.

    “Amer­ica believes that with­out
    the par­tic­i­pa­tion of ‘Sunni’
    par­ties in the regime those ar–
    range­ments will fail.

    “For that rea­son cut­ting Iran’s
    claws has become one of the im–
    por­tant require­ments for the
    Amer­i­can arrange­ments.

    “This is a neces­sity that the
    Amer­i­can [ambas­sador] Zal­may
    [Khalilzad] openly spoke of re–
    cently when he declared that no
    sec­tar­ian would take con­trol of
    the Min­istries of the Inte­rior
    or Defense in the new Iraqi
    pup­pet ‘gov­ern­ment’.

    “Sim­i­larly, Amer­ica has begun to
    pub­lish infor­ma­tion that it
    for­merly kept hid­den regard­ing
    the crimes of the Badr Brigade
    and the ‘Inte­rior Min­istry.’

    “It is there­fore in Iran’s in–
    ter­est to attack holy Shi’i
    Islamic tombs now because it
    seeks to rally the peo­ple of
    south­ern Iraq behind the Iran­ian
    posi­tion [in Iraq] and in defense
    of Iran through increased pres–
    sure on Amer­ica in Iraq.

    “This is a dif­fi­cult task for
    them since the vast major­ity of
    the peo­ple of south­ern Iraq know
    that Iran is plan­ning to destroy
    Iraq and par­ti­tion it, annex­ing
    south­ern Iraq to itself under
    the so-called ‘fed­er­a­tion’
    scheme of ‘Abd al-‘Aziz al-Hakim
    [the leader of SCIRI].

    “There­fore, they [= Iran’s agents]
    have sensed an urgent need to re–
    gain some unity around their posi–
    tion among the south­ern Iraqi
    peo­ple, so as to sub­or­di­nate them
    to Iran.

    “For this they required a crime
    the likes of which has not been
    com­mit­ted before – namely an at–
    tack on a holy tomb in an area
    that is not pre­dom­i­nantly Shi’i so
    that it could be blamed on the
    Sun­nis, and be used to pro­mote the
    rapid spread of the wild­fire of
    sec­tar­ian strife, in order to
    guar­an­tee Iran suf­fi­cient forces
    to keep Amer­ica embroiled in Iraq
    and to reduce Amer­i­can pres­sure on
    Tehran.

    “This would also achieve one of the
    most impor­tant and old­est Amer­i­can
    goals in Iraq, namely split­ting up
    the coun­try.“


    In other words, Iran’s pres­sure on
    The Super­power includes candy to
    make that pres­sure palat­able…

    That candy is what moti­vated The
    Liar’s cow­ardly “we don’t know“
    lie.


    There’s more.

    ”…the crim­i­nal attack on the
    tomb of the Imam ‘Ali al-Hadi
    was car­ried out by the agents of
    Iran, sup­ported by Amer­i­can in–
    ter­ests, which con­sist in com–
    pelling ‘Sunni’ groups to take
    part in their polit­i­cal opera–
    tion.

    “They [= the Amer­i­can inter­ests]
    hope to reach this goal more
    speed­ily by putting more pres­sure
    on known Sunni groups by ignit­ing
    a lim­ited sec­tar­ian war.“

    A lim­ited sec­tar­ian war?

    That notion is what moti­vated
    pol­ished Rice to warn “against
    char­ac­ter­iz­ing the ris­ing tur­moil
    as a har­bin­ger of civil war” [in
    AP’s Mosque Bomb­ing story].


    You now may won­der who’s beat­ing
    whom in that already-declared

    IRANSUPERPOWER WAR.




    [1]

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/23/AR2006022300721_pf.html

    [2]

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PoliticalEssays/message/687

    [3]

    http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/80581

  24. Amer­i­can Killers of the Iraquian Peo­ple . Amer­i­can Thieves of the Iraquian Petroleo .

  25. The Mustafa Mosque Mas­sacre was No Acci­dent or Error:

    Let’s be clear: the attack on the Mustafa mosque was no acci­dent, nor was it some stu­pid move by a low-ranking offi­cer who didn’t know the impli­ca­tions of what he was doing. The attack was a delib­er­ate act of intim­i­da­tion and provo­ca­tion directed against the Shi’ia major­ity by U.S. occu­pa­tion author­i­ties. It will not be the last.

    The U.S. has no inter­est in a suc­cess­ful Iraq gov­ern­ment, since it is now clear that such a gov­ern­ment will be Shi’ia led, and close to Iran polit­i­cally. There­fore, my guess is that the fall­back strat­egy is to rev up the Shi’ia mil­i­tants, stir up civil strife, and per­haps even to get the Sunni minor­ity, long the heart of oppo­si­tion to the U.S., to turn to the U.S. for help, as the Kurds did years back.

  26. OPERATION GLADIO.

    Ring a bell any­one? These peo­ple think they are slick but any­one can see through the decep­tion. That is when the media decides to cover it.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. http://www.kevinsites.net/http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=723#comments”¡Jesús mis­eri­cor­dioso! Mis peca­dos son más que las gotas de san­gre que der­ra­maste por mí. No merezco pertenecer al ejército que defiende los dere­chos de tu Igle­sia y que lucha por ti. Quisiera nunca haber pecado para que mi vida fuera una ofrenda agrad­able a tus ojos. Lávame de mis iniq­uidades y límpiame de mis peca­dos. Por tu santa Cruz, por mi Madre San­tísima de Guadalupe, perdó­name, no he sabido hacer pen­i­ten­cia de mis peca­dos; por eso quiero recibir la muerte como un cas­tigo mere­cido por ellos. No quiero pelear, ni vivir ni morir, sino por ti y por tu Igle­sia. ¡Madre Santa de Guadalupe!, acom­paña en su agonía a este pobre pecador. Con­cédeme que mi último grito en la tierra y mi primer cán­tico en el cielo sea ¡Viva Cristo Rey!”. Oración com­puesta por Ana­cleto González Flo­res, que los cris­teros de Jalisco rez­a­ban al final del Rosario 28/Feb/2006 15:15 GMT+1 Per­fil    Pri­vado   MessengerPublicidad […]

  2. […] Select lan­guage Select inter­face language:Cymraeg Eng­lish IRAQ ROAD TO REAL PEACE AND DEMOCRACY Posted by: ilyan The first obvi­ous is that the present Gov­ern­ment are Quislings.The sec­ond obvi­ous is that things are not nearly bad enough for the oppos­ing Reli­gious fac­tions to unite to throw out the Quis­lings and their Masters.The third obvi­ous is that peo­ple do not learn from His­tory. Go read “Peace­maker” the email sent to Sad­dam Hus­sein before the sec­ond inva­sion. It advises a full blown Swiss solu­tion with improve­ments. Is at http://www.indycymru.org.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=682(how can we shorten that URL?)Yes it is the Mosque bomb­ing that prompts this. Was it a USer action to ter­rify the Iraqis to sub­mit to the Quis­lings? Note: com­ment leads to more at http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=244 but http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=723#comments seems to have been hacked.   […]

  3. […] The vic­tims were Shia and Sunni return­ing from a demon­stra­tion in the town of Kenaan, when they were dragged from their cars and killed. Their bod­ies were left in a ditch by the side of the road. The scale and inten­sity of the vio­lence increas­ingly resem­bles Lebanon at the start of its bloody civil war 30 years ago. WSWS: Sec­tar­ian vio­lence engulfs Iraq fol­low­ing mosque bomb­ing. URUKNET.INFO: Whose Bombs were They? BAGHDAD DWELLER: The night before the bomb­ing: Two eye­wit­nesses. –This runs smoothly and in com­plete accord with the ZIONIST plan for the region. Check Oded Yinon: The Zion­ist Plan for the Mid­dle East. Voice Your Opinion […]

  4. […] Chnic. You are cor­rect. It is a con­spir­acy. Don’t you see that what is going on in Iraq and what hap­pened on 911 are are com­po­nents of a coor­di­nated US, British, and Israeli agenda. http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=723 — - — - — View Replies » […]

  5. Myspace.com says:

    […] Are Iraqi cit­i­zens (A, B) qual­i­fied to do so? […]

  6. […] He con­firmed again that the cur­few starts at 8,00 (evening) until next day 6,00 (morn­ing), INGs and the Amer­i­cans will sur­round and patrol the city all that time.” [link] […]

  7. […] [2] BAGHDAD DWELLER, The night before the bomb­ing: Two eye­wit­nesses.  Yet another Iraqi blog, 23 Feb­ru­ary 2006. (http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=723) […]

  8. […] Tor­ture for all the world to see. When the Amer­i­cans first opened Camp Delta tor­ture cen­tre at their Guan­tanamo base in Cuba to hold hostages from around the world, they released an offi­cial pho­to­graph of peo­ple dressed to be de-humanised in orange over­alls, blind­fold gog­gles, ear­muffs, nose and mouth masks, gloves and shack­led in chains. In enforced, total sen­sory depri­va­tion — except for touch when tor­tured or beaten or as in the photo man­han­dled. I had orig­i­nally thought that the photo was taken from Cuban ter­ri­tory and pub­lished as another expose of the long his­tory of Amer­i­can bar­bar­ity in the Caribbean and beyond. Until I saw the by-line. The Times cred­ited the pho­tos to the US Navy. Guan­tanamo is not just a tor­ture cen­tre, that would be bad enough in itself, but it is worse and much, much more sin­is­ter. Every­body knows that tor­ture doesn’t work in pro­vid­ing reli­able infor­ma­tion. The tor­tured tell the tor­turer what is already decided the tor­tured should say by the tor­turer before the tor­ture starts. The tor­turer knows this but the tor­turer also knows the psy­cho­log­i­cal power that tor­ture has in instill­ing fear, hatred and oppo­si­tion in those the tor­turer has demonised as ‘Other’, and for whom the tor­tured is iden­ti­fied with through race, reli­gion, nation­al­ity or just their human­ity. Tor­ture is very effec­tive in cre­at­ing ene­mies. Instill­ing fear in those you wish to fight is an old, old mil­i­tary tac­tic now being spread via a mod­ern and com­plicit glob­alised cor­po­rate media. The shock-jocks, the colum­nists, the jour­nal­ists, the news anchors nearly all of whom cor­rupt lan­guage and soul when they glo­rify or attempt to jus­tify, make accept­able, the use of tor­ture as state pol­icy. The pri­mary ratio­nale for Camp Delta at Guan­tanamo is Psy-ops — mil­i­tary psy­cho­log­i­cal oper­a­tions. The Statue of Lib­erty now declares to the world, as she lights the fuse, “This is what hap­pens to you who would dare attempt to defend your land and wealth from me”. Its an exam­ple for each one of use on this planet to see, to pon­der what hap­pens to any­body Amer­ica thinks may, at some time in the future of this ‘long war’, pos­si­bly har­bour a smidgen of ani­mos­ity to America’s arro­gance in think­ing the world’s resources are theirs to steal. Tor­ture is the last refuge of a class pet­ri­fied that they may lose con­trol as this mul­ti­fac­eted cri­sis we are in unfolds. Tor­ture, the only answer a para­noid class and it’s state can find and which is not really an answer but an admis­sion of weak­ness. Of not know­ing how and not want­ing to change. A pdf of the USA Depart­ment of Defence, Infor­ma­tion Oper­a­tion Roadmap 2003 — the military’s psy­cho­log­i­cal oper­a­tions man­ual — is avail­able at the BBC (scroll down page). Over the last few weeks this strat­egy of fear has been refined. No longer is the whole of the world’s poor tar­geted. It is now directed solely at Arabs/Muslims. A Dan­ish paper, known for its sup­port of the extreme right, com­mis­sioned some car­toons char­ac­ter­is­ing the Prophet Mohammed and by exten­sion all Mus­lims, in much the same way that Nazi Ger­many did with Jews over 70 years ago. Every­thing bad in the world is laid at their feet, is their fault. The visual sim­i­lar­ity is star­tling. The car­toons are anti-semitic if one accepts that Jew and Arab are both semitic peo­ple, as well as being a cal­cu­lated insult to Islam. (If the pre­vi­ous link doesn’t work then refer to Cam­bridge Dic­tio­nary Online and look up — the fol­low­ing link does link to the C.D.O. def­i­n­i­tion.) Jew­ish anti-semitism is quite rightly out­lawed in Europe. Whilst the anti-cartoon riots and demon­stra­tions were going on, the Nazi’s apol­o­gist his­to­rian — David Irv­ing — was gaoled in Aus­tria for deny­ing the Holo­caust. The Mayor of Lon­don, Ken Liv­ingston has been sus­pended for a month for what were deemed anti-semitic remarks to a Jew­ish jour­nal­ist. (For an analy­sis of the polit­i­cal impli­ca­tions to Livingston’s plight, as well as a look at the edi­to­r­ial prac­tise of the organ­i­sa­tion the reporter works for, read Mike Mar­qusee at Znet.) These two actions against Jew­ish anti-semitism osten­si­bly cod­ify the anti-racist cre­den­tials of euro­pean lib­er­al­ism but in fact dis­quise the racism of the Arab anti-semitism that is so graph­i­cally dis­played in the car­toons. At least two out­comes were expected from the car­toons pub­li­ca­tion and to a cer­tain extent were achieved. The first was to pro­voke and inflame the Mus­lim street and in the process under­mine the author­ity of their own gov­ern­ments. This was not as suc­cess­ful as was hoped because the major­ity of Mus­lims seen the car­toons for what they are – provo­ca­tions and didn’t respond with vio­lence. But the riots and death threats that did erupt aided the more suc­cess­ful out­come of shift­ing Euro­pean lib­eral sen­ti­ment against Mus­lims who they now see as being anti-free speech and there­fore against human rights – fun­da­men­tal tenets of lib­eral ide­ol­ogy despite free speech not being a real­ity in any Euro­pean democ­racy. When an idea gains hege­monic hold it becomes per­sonal to the indi­vid­ual even if the idea is not sup­ported by fact or is absolutely idi­otic like believ­ing in fairies or Bush or Blair. Talk about being ‘con­flicted’. Although writ­ing and singing about Amer­i­cans, Phil Ochs had all lib­er­als and social democ­rats down to a T. “In every Amer­i­can com­mu­nity there are var­i­ous shades of polit­i­cal opinion.One of the shadi­est of these is the liberals.10 degrees to the left of cen­tre in good times.10 degrees to the right of cen­tre if it affects them personally.”Live intro to ‘Love Me I’m A Lib­eral’ Yes, I read the Repub­lic and Nation.I’ve learnt to take every view.You know I’ve mem­o­rised Lerner and Golden.I feel like I’m almost a Jew.But when it comes to times like KoreaThere’s no one more red, white and blue.So love me, love me, love me. I’m a lib­eral. From ‘Love Me I’m A Lib­eral’ Phil Ochs Euro­peans, unless Mus­lim, are now more likely to believe that the hor­rors of Guan­tanamo will not be vis­ited on them. Eas­ing some of the fear from Amer­i­can prac­tise and redi­rect­ing it against the Other. Against the Mus­lim — the per­ceived back­ward and weaker and hence the eas­ier tar­get for express­ing our fear. Ille­gal wars are given jus­ti­fi­ca­tion like this. The prob­lem though is that the great­est war­riors are those defend­ing their homes. If you do not believe that the pub­lish­ing of the car­toons were a delib­er­ate provo­ca­tion of Mus­lims and manip­u­la­tion of Euro­pean think­ing, then I sug­gest you read the arti­cle by John Sugg at Pales­tine Chron­i­cle, which exposes the tim­ing of a meet­ing between the edi­tor respon­si­ble and the extreme Chris­tain right in Amer­ica as well as the his­tory of the paper involved. Shortly after the pub­li­ca­tion of the car­toons, fur­ther pic­tures and videos of tor­ture at Abu Ghraib were pub­lished in Aus­tralia. When the first tranche of pic­tures appeared two years ago there was an out­cry from around the world but the tor­ture has con­tin­ued unabated through­out the CIA’s world­wide Gulag. What has abated how­ever is the level of out­rage from the Euro­pean and Amer­i­can pub­lic. It is as if the under­stand­ing of what is tor­ture has been raised to the level of accept­abil­ity. No longer the hell­ish out­rage and affront to human dig­nity that it is. The Bush White House has been fight­ing the release of these new images in Amer­ica. So the tim­ing of their appear­ance, as well as the appear­ance of the video of British troops viciously beat­ing chil­dren, has me, how shall I put this, feel­ing slightly sus­pi­cious about how they came into the pub­lic domain. The British sun­day paper (News of the World, owned by Mur­doch via ICH) and the Aus­tralian TV (via ICH) chan­nel that first aired them, quite rightly so, may have been given a con­trolled release. But why? Com­ing so close on the heels of the car­toons, and if it is part of a Psy-ops cam­paign, then I think it is to inten­sify the feel­ing of Mus­lim iso­la­tion from Europe. And test how alien­ated Mus­lims are from Amer­i­can, Euro­pean and Aus­tralian feel­ings fol­low­ing the pub­lish­ing of the car­toons,. The speed by which the stink dies down com­pared to the orig­i­nal dis­clo­sure two years ago, could be a reli­able indi­ca­tor of pub­lic engage­ment. Sac­ri­lege has recently been vis­ited on Samarra. The al-Askariya Mosque, shrine to two Shi’a Imams Ali Al-Hadi and Has­san Al-Askari was bombed by men in black. The imme­di­ate response in Europe and Amer­ica was to see civil war. This despite eye­wit­ness reports from the area that Amer­i­can troops and the ING were on patrol around the Mosque all night and left just min­utes before the explo­sion. It took hours to plant the expertly placed explo­sives. This has all the hall­marks of Black-ops. The twin of Psy-ops in the dark arts and who never plan with­out ref­er­ence to each other. That it was Black-ops was strength­ened for me by the speed with which the assas­si­na­tion squads started killing Sunni. Almost as soon as the dust died down the death squads were on the streets. The peo­ple to read to get an idea of what is hap­pen­ning in Iraq are; Truth About Iraqis, River­bend and Bagh­dad Dweller. Brave humans all. The Bagh­dad Dweller link is to an arti­cle that car­ries two eye­wit­ness reports. What have we become if even the bar­barous Mon­gol Hoards never touched the al-Askariya Mosque, the shim­mer­ing jewel of Islamic archi­tec­ture, out of awe and respect when they invaded and con­quered Samarra. Why the Psy-ops? Well it is obvi­ously a build up to some­thing. Could it be an attack on Shia Iran? I think this is the only pos­si­ble con­clu­sion that can be drawn. The tim­ing fits with the Ira­ni­ans plans to estab­lish a Bourse in Tehran and start trad­ing their oil in Euros by the end of March. The shift away from coun­tries hav­ing to buy dol­lars to buy oil would under­mine the pre-eminence of the dol­lar as the world’s reserve cur­rency (see Coilin Nunan at Coun­ter­cur­rents). Also at the end of March the Ira­ni­ans should have on stream their two satel­lites that the Rus­sians made and launched for them, and which are believed to have ‘early warn­ing’ abil­i­ties. All the claims about Iran hav­ing nuclear weapons and that they should be referred to the UN is just hyper­bole. The Iran­ian plans to do as they see fit with their oil and their national secu­rity in the face of American/British impe­r­ial oppo­si­tion is the main rea­son for this build up in ten­sion. The down­sides of a mil­i­tary assault and inva­sion far out­weigh any ben­e­fits the American/British could pos­si­bly hope to achieve. Iran will prove to be a more for­mi­da­ble enemy than Iraq hav­ing not lived through 12 years of sanc­tions and hav­ing built up a well equiped, mod­ern and moti­vated mil­i­tary. Both Amer­i­can and British forces are over­stetched fight­ing two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq against a strength­en­ing Resis­tance. Moral is shot. The impe­r­ial pow­ers also have a prob­lem with using nuclear weapons despite hav­ing inte­grated them into their regional bat­tle­plans as reported by Chos­su­dovsky at Global Research. (Not that depleted ura­nium is a nuclear weapon of course!). In 1985 when Gor­bachev met with Rea­gan, he told Rea­gan the Sovi­ets had already devel­oped a counter to his Strate­gic Defence Ini­tia­tive – ‘Star Wars’. The Rus­sians have sold to the Ira­ni­ans and Chi­nese the dual pur­pose – con­ven­tional and nuclear cruise mis­sile they devel­oped. This thing trav­els at over Mach2, twice the speed of sound, can fly 9ft above the ground out of sight of radar and then as it nears its tar­get, manoeu­vre vio­lently with no chance of inter­cept­ing. It is unstop­pable as the Amer­i­cans found out when the Chi­nese used one for prac­tise in the Pacific. Two years ago it only had a range of 100 miles but with the advances in tech­nol­ogy this could have been extented. Under­es­ti­mate Russ­ian sci­ence at your peril, they are not encum­bered with such non­sense as ‘faith based’ sci­en­tific research. See Mark Gaffney at ICH. There is of course the pos­si­bil­ity of an attack by Israel. They have cer­tainly upped the rhetoric bat­tle with Iran and have pre­vi­ously bombed a nuclear reac­tor under con­struc­tion in Iraq. There are also reports that Israel has war planes sta­tioned in Turkey near the Iran/Turkey bor­der and that they have recently received a large con­sign­ment of bunker buster bombs from Amer­ica. Israel is a nuclear power and would object, to put it mildly, Iran hav­ing an early warn­ing sys­tem that could thwart a sur­prise con­ven­tial attack on their nuclear facil­i­ties. Euro­pean sen­si­tiv­ity to the guilt of our Jew­ish anti-semitism end­ing up in the Holo­caust, has been ruth­lessly exploited by Israel since its incep­tion as a state in its pro­pa­ganda cam­paign against Pales­tini­ans. The tim­ing and the political/cultural impact of the trial of Irv­ing and sus­pen­sion of Liv­ingston, couldn’t have hap­pened at a bet­ter time if we are in the midst of a Psy-ops cam­paign as a build up to war on Iran. Both deci­sions are very sup­port­ive to Israel, which claims rep­re­sen­ta­tion of all Jewry, at a time when all Mus­lims are being made ‘Other’ with crude, infan­tile anti-semitic car­toons. The Chi­nese and Rus­sians would not stand pas­sively by. They have both invested to heav­ily in Iran’s oil and nuclear indus­tries and will not appre­ci­ate Amer­ica gain­ing con­trol of 50% of the worlds oil, which they would do if they tried to annex the big oil­fields in south west Iran. For China the loss of their con­tracts for Iran­ian oil and gas could dam­age their growth quite sub­stan­tially. Expect Europe to get a cut in gas sup­plies from Rus­sia at the very least. The present nego­ti­a­tions between Iran and Rus­sia over the ura­nium enrich­ment process for the Iran­ian reac­tors being done in Rus­sia, seems to be advanc­ing pos­i­tively. The Ira­ni­ans come across as quite con­fi­dent of some­thing being decided. Any pro­to­col adopted through an agree­ment between Iran and Rus­sia on this may be adopted by the Inter­na­tional Atomic Energy Author­ity. Help­ful diplo­macy in a time of ten­sion from the Rus­sians is being inter­preted in Wash­ing­ton as a threat in that it could place Rus­sia as the pre­mier sup­plier of enriched ura­nium to coun­tries around the world who desire nuclear power. The cri­sis of peak oil has brought back into the energy equa­tion the exten­sion of nuclear pro­duced power with a vengeance. And who are we who have it to tell oth­ers they can’t have this knowl­edge and the higher edu­ca­tion it requires? The nego­tia­tons are con­tin­u­ing. Although on the bal­ance of ben­e­fit it seems sane not to attack and invade Iran, san­ity could have noth­ing to do with it. The Amer­ica econ­omy is one big bub­ble and the open­ing of an Iran­ian oil Bourse trad­ing in euros could be the pin that pricks. It is going to col­lapse at some point any­way so why not sup­press the demand for oil by lock­ing it in the ground, engi­neer a pop­u­la­tion crash while the Amer­ica of oli­garchs, neo­cons, gang­sters and other assorted mem­bers of it’s cap­i­tal­ist class, still have a slim chance of main­tain­ing world dom­i­nance. They cer­tainly will not be in a dom­i­nant posi­tion if they allow oil trad­ing in euros and can no longer main­tain the eco­nomic bub­ble by issu­ing fiat dol­lars to a cap­tive clien­tèle of oil depen­dent nations. Being America’s poo­dle, Britain’s con­tin­ued trad­ing of our oil for dol­lars at the Lon­don Petro­leum Exchange is the one and only rea­son Blair has obfus­cated about join­ing the Euro. What can we do in Britain besides just cam­paign­ing to join the euro? As I have said before and will con­tinue say­ing, non-violent mass par­tic­i­pa­tory civil dis­obe­di­ence and direct action – from peti­tions to strikes — are the only means by which we can achieve an end that results in peace. The war machine has to be dis­rupted. Stopped from killing. The World Tri­bunal on Iraq and the BRus­sels Tri­bunal have given a lead and pro­duced some of the clear­est guides to action against the war. All of our peace and anti-war organ­i­sa­tions should be tak­ing them on board and organ­is­ing around them. In the short term organ­is­ing for the demo in Lon­don on the 18th March has to be a pri­or­ity, though this should not detract from local events/actions being con­ducted on the day. A day out in Lon­don is always attrac­tive and when its for a vital cause, why not? It is never to late for peace. CommentsComment Test­Writ­ten by n This email address is being pro­tected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it on 2006-04-29 09:15:53This is a test com­ment func­tion x () { return; } func­tion ac_smilie(thesmile) { document.akocommentform.comment.value += ” “+thesmile+” “; document.akocommentform.comment.focus(); } func­tion val­i­date(){ if (document.akocommentform.comment.value==”){ alert(“Please insert at least a com­ment related to the topic!”); } else if (document.akocommentform.acname.value==”){ alert(“_AKOCOMMENT_FORMVALIDATENAME”); }else { document.akocommentform.action = ‘index.php’; document.akocommentform.submit(); } }func­tion DoPrompt(action) { var revisedMes­sage; var cur­rentMes­sage = document.akocommentform.comment.value; if (action == “url”) { var thisURL = prompt(“Enter the URL for the link you want to add.”, “http://”); var this­Ti­tle = prompt(“Enter the web site title”, “Page Title”); var urlB­B­Code = “[URL=”+thisURL+”]”+thisTitle+“[/URL]”; revisedMes­sage = currentMessage+urlBBCode; document.akocommentform.comment.value=revisedMessage; document.akocommentform.comment.focus(); return; } if (action == “email”) { var thisE­mail = prompt(“Enter the email address you want to add.”, “”); var emailB­B­Code = “[EMAIL]”+thisEmail+“[/EMAIL]”; revisedMes­sage = currentMessage+emailBBCode; document.akocommentform.comment.value=revisedMessage; document.akocommentform.comment.focus(); return; } if (action == “bold”) { var this­Bold = prompt(“Enter the text that you want to make bold.”, “”); var boldB­B­Code = “[B]”+thisBold+“[/B]”; revisedMes­sage = currentMessage+boldBBCode; document.akocommentform.comment.value=revisedMessage; document.akocommentform.comment.focus(); return; } if (action == “italic”) { var thisI­tal = prompt(“Enter the text that you want to make italic.”, “”); var italB­B­Code = “[I]”+thisItal+“[/I]”; revisedMes­sage = currentMessage+italBBCode; document.akocommentform.comment.value=revisedMessage; document.akocommentform.comment.focus(); return; } if (action == “under­line”) { var thisUndl = prompt(“Enter the text that you want to be unde­lined.”, “”); var undlB­B­Code = “[U]”+thisUndl+“[/U]”; revisedMes­sage = currentMessage+undlBBCode; document.akocommentform.comment.value=revisedMessage; document.akocommentform.comment.focus(); return; } if (action == “image”) { var thisIm­age = prompt(“Enter the URL for the image you want to dis­play.”, “http://”); var imageB­B­Code = “[IMG]”+thisImage+“[/IMG]”; revisedMes­sage = currentMessage+imageBBCode; document.akocommentform.comment.value=revisedMessage; document.akocommentform.comment.focus(); return; } if (action == “quote”) { var quoteB­B­Code = “[QUOTE] [/QUOTE]”; revisedMes­sage = currentMessage+quoteBBCode; document.akocommentform.comment.value=revisedMessage; document.akocommentform.comment.focus(); return; } if (action == “code”) { var codeB­B­Code = “[CODE] [/CODE]”; revisedMes­sage = currentMessage+codeBBCode; document.akocommentform.comment.value=revisedMessage; document.akocommentform.comment.focus(); return; } if (action == “listopen”) { var list­startB­B­Code = “[LIST]”; revisedMes­sage = currentMessage+liststartBBCode; document.akocommentform.comment.value=revisedMessage; document.akocommentform.comment.focus(); return; } if (action == “list­close”) { var lis­tendB­B­Code = “[/LIST]”; revisedMes­sage = currentMessage+listendBBCode; document.akocommentform.comment.value=revisedMessage; document.akocommentform.comment.focus(); return; } if (action == “lis­titem”) { var thisItem = prompt(“Enter the new list item. Note that each list group must be pre­ceeded by a List Close and must be ended with List Close.”, “”); var item­B­B­Code = “[*]”+thisItem; revisedMes­sage = currentMessage+itemBBCode; document.akocommentform.comment.value=revisedMessage; document.akocommentform.comment.focus(); return; }}Write Com­ment­Please keep the topic of mes­sages rel­e­vant to the sub­ject of the article.Personal ver­bal attacks will be deleted.Please don’t use com­ments to plug your web site. Such mate­r­ial will be removed.Name:E-mailHomepageTitle:BBCode:Comment:Code:* Pow­ered by AkoComment!   […]

  9. […] where blow­ing up a mar­ket­place is com­pletely jus­ti­fi­able as an act of “resis­tance”. but i sup­pose in your world blow­ing up a mosque in a psy­ops cam­paign to insti­gate sec­re­tar­ian divi­sion is accept­able. there is no evi­dence samarra was an AQ act. it is con­in­u­ally used to jus­tify shi­ite ‘revenge’ and yet the fact remains there is an abun­dance of evi­dence the shi­ite mili­tias were thriv­ing prior to the mosque bomb­ing. the esca­la­tion that ensued after the bomb­ing ben­e­fit­ted some­one, who? not AQ.The al-Askariya Mosque, shrine to two Shi’a Imams Ali Al-Hadi and Has­san Al-Askari was bombed by men in black. The imme­di­ate response in Europe and Amer­ica was to see civil war. This despite eye­wit­ness reports from the area that Amer­i­can troops and the ING were on patrol around the Mosque all night and left just min­utes before the explo­sion. It took hours to plant the expertly placed explosives.This has all the hall­marks of Black-ops. The twin of Psy-ops in the dark arts and who never plan with­out ref­er­ence to each other. That it was Black-ops was strength­ened for me by the speed with which the assas­si­na­tion squads started killing Sunni. Almost as soon as the dust died down the death squads were on the streets.plusThere have been three occa­sions when allied troops have been directly con­nected to the bomb­ing inci­dents which are invari­ably blamed either on for­eign jihadis or Sunni resis­tance fight­ers. The first was the famous inci­dent in Basra where two British para­mil­i­taries were caught dis­guised as Arabs with a truck-full of explo­sives in their vehi­cle. Pan­icky British forces destroyed the Basra jail to release the two cap­tured SAS sol­diers clearly afraid that occu­pa­tion forces would be directly con­nected to the sav­age bomb­ings that are designed to pro­mote sec­tar­ian warfare.An inter­view on Syr­ian TV with Ziyad Al-Munajid on the night the special-forces sol­diers were caught clar­i­fies this point, Al-Munajid said,“This inci­dent gave answers to ques­tions and sus­pi­cions that were lack­ing evi­dence about the par­tic­i­pa­tion of the occu­pa­tion in some armed oper­a­tions in Iraq. Many ana­lysts and observers here had sus­pi­cions that the occu­pa­tion was involved in some armed oper­a­tions against civil­ians and places of wor­ship and in the killing of sci­en­tists. But those were only sus­pi­cions that lacked proof. The proof came today through the arrest of the two British sol­diers while they were plant­ing explo­sives in one of the Basra streets. This proves, accord­ing to observers, that the occu­pa­tion is not far from many oper­a­tions that seek to sow sedi­tion and main­tain dis­or­der, as this would give the occu­pa­tion the jus­ti­fi­ca­tion to stay in Iraq for a longer period. “The hard­line Sunni Cler­i­cal Asso­ci­a­tion of Mus­lim Schol­ars said 168 Sunni mosques had been attacked, 10 imams killed and 15 abducted since the shrine attack. The Inte­rior Min­istry said it could only con­firm fig­ures for Bagh­dad, where 90 mosques were attacked in Bagh­dad, one cleric was killed, and one abducted.Officials said at least 110 peo­ple had been killed across the coun­try in vio­lence believed trig­gered by the mosque attack.why?03/15/06(Reuters) — An Amer­i­can described as a secu­rity con­trac­tor arrested by police in a north­ern Iraqi town was car­ry­ing weapons in his car, a provin­cial offi­cial said. Abdul­lah Jebara, the Deputy Gov­er­nor of Sala­haddin province, told Reuters the man was arrested in Sad­dam Hussein’s home­town of Tikrit on Mon­day. He was removed from the provin­cial gov­ern­ment build­ing by U.S. forces on Tues­day, Jebara said. The Joint Coor­di­na­tion Cen­ter between the U.S. and Iraqi mil­i­tary in Tikrit said the man, whom it described as a secu­rity con­trac­tor work­ing for a pri­vate com­pany, pos­sessed explo­sives which were found in his car. It said he was arrested on Tues­day. The man was stopped by police for vio­lat­ing a day­time cur­few in Tikrit, a secu­rity source said. Amer­i­can secu­rity per­son­nel rarely travel alone. U.S. offi­cials had no imme­di­ate comment.my world has a lit­tle more nuance than yours. if there was no psy­ops cam­paign there would be no need for psy­ops forces. they do more than cre­ate fake news for us to swal­low. there would also be no need for con­trac­tors in iraq who are not bound by geneava con­ven­tion. the very peo­ple who first con­cieved of this war are stu­dents of strat­egy of ten­sion and nefar­i­ous ways of pur­su­ing objec­tives of impe­ri­al­ism, and yes, that is def­i­nitely their goal.accuse me of being bat­shit crazy, or study his­tory and the ways in which other wars started and operated. […]

  10. […] posted document.write(timestamp(new Date(2007,1,3,9,10,0), dfrm, tfrm, 0, 0, 0, 0)); 02-03-2007 09:10 AM                        Bold­Fen­ian, I agree with you 100% that the vast major­ity of our troops are putting tremen­dous effort and mak­ing great sac­ri­fice to hold our mil­i­tary together. And, many of them have con­ver­sa­tions along the lines of this thread.Unfortunately, the “glob­ally aligned fac­tion” has had the upper hand in Iraq. Look what it accom­plished. It’s first goal was to keep the US troops bogged down in Iraq by foment­ing a guer­rilla war against them.Instead of order­ing the Iraqi army to dis­arm and sur­ren­der then hir­ing them back to spear­head the rebuild­ing effort, Brem­mer sent them home armed and with­out pay.Then, a heavy handed psy­ops cam­paign run by either glob­al­ist aligned or mis­guided mem­bers of West­ern intel­li­gence and at least some of the upper ech­e­lons of coali­tion com­mand directed Iraqi hatred toward the US troops. Abu Ghraib was only one aspect of this operation.That the killing of the old man in the mosque in Fal­luja, pic­tures released of armed US troops relax­ing on the prayer rugs in a mosque, and order­ing male troops to search female Iraqis were merely mis­steps is a naive assess­ment in my opinion.I would also not dis­count the pos­si­bil­ity that many of the bomb­ings of civil­ian tar­gets, such as pri­vate homes and wed­ding cer­e­monies, were tar­gets delib­er­ately selected by glob­ally aligned intel, the coor­di­nates fed to the trust­ing US Air Force com­man­ders, to cre­ate more ene­mies for the US.Now, the glob­al­ist focus has shifted more toward foment­ing a civil war, per­haps as that is more likely to pull in neigh­bor­ing coun­tries allied with the var­i­ous fac­tions in Iraq.Like my points above, I’d say the fol­low­ing are likely just glimpses at the tip of that iceberg.http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=BOW20050923&articleId=990http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=723http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2005/10/02/us_car_theft_rings_probed_for_ties_to_iraq_bombings/ Posts: 20 | From: Michi­gan | Reg­is­tered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged |  […]

  11. […] The night before the bomb­ing: Two eyewitnesses […]

  12. […] mosques all the time. Al-Maliki sug­gests it was US forces to main­tain their occu­pa­tionSo do a cou­ple eye­wit­nesses (pops).Hey, when the Shia and Sunni are fight­ing against each other, they’re too busy to unite and […]

  13. […] Refresher: The night before the bomb­ing: Two eye­wit­nesses 2–18 […]

  14. yesterday says:

    […] Refresher: The night before the bomb­ing: Two eye­wit­nesses 2–18 […]

  15. […] night before the bomb­ing: Two eye­wit­ness­es­Bagh­dad Dweller­Free IraqSamara’s black day .… لا سُـرّ من رأىDestruc­tion of holi­est Shia […]

  16. […] vio­lence. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,921926,0... &#149 Found on Ask.com The night before the bomb­ing: Two eye­wit­nesses He is a native of Samarra, his PHd the­sis is on the Imams of the Prophet’s fam­ily … Carlos […]

The night before the bombing: Two eyewitnesses

This article was written February 23rd, 2006, with the mathematical number of 103 contributions.