Bad example…Tal Afar

In his speech yes­ter­day, George Bush said:

In this city, we see the out­lines of the Iraq that we and the Iraqi peo­ple have been fight­ing for….The story of Tal Afar also shows that with a basic level of safety and secu­rity, Iraqis can live together peace­fully, he said.

Bush: Suc­cess in Tal Afar Shows Evi­dence Iraqi Strat­egy Working.

A des­per­ate attempt to show Amer­i­cans that the US is mak­ing progress in Iraq, lack of a sin­gle exam­ple Bush chose Tal Afar as a model.

First, Tal Afar is not a “city” as you under­stand the word, Tal Afar is much, much smaller than a city and some­thing just big­ger than a village.

We had a long dis­cus­sion before on this here.

How safe is Tal Afar?,

This Ara­bic link from Iraqi web­site today says it all, I will trans­late it as it is:

Mor­tar fire attack on coali­tion head quar­ter in Tal Afar injured one sol­dier, trans­ported later to the hospital.

On the same or other sub­ject (call it what you want), Bush said today:

Bush says U.S. to use mil­i­tary might to pro­tect Israel,

From who?, Sure from Iran
Well, he is the same Bush who ready to talk to Iran about the Iraq issue.

Iran Agrees to Talk With U.S. About Iraq.

This entry was posted in POLITICS and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Bad example…Tal Afar

  1. Charles says:

    Hah!

    That was the first post I ever saw on this blog.

    LB has a very poor mem­ory. The sol­diers involved explained them­selves quite thoroughly.

    You are delib­er­ately lying A G A I N LB.

  2. --TBAS says:

    Question…what exactly is your post? Is it just rehash­ing news or …well, I cant really tell if there was a point. Granted, I’m not in any posi­tion as I gen­er­ally utter point­less drivel…but are you tak­ing issue with the use of the word city?

    Or how safe Tal Afar is? Although its close to Mosul, we gen­er­ally con­sider it safe. Incom­ing mor­tars do not make a place unsafe.

    Althoug..the using of US Mil to pro­tect isreal–I’m not sure whay we would need to. Isreal is a pretty damn pow­er­ful mil­i­tary nation–they have some of the utmost best fighter pilots and ground troops in the world. And, unlike the US, they don’t really care if they kill a ton of inno­cent civilians.

  3. --TBAS says:

    Wait a minute–you call this Bagh­dad Dweller. Sooo…why is the time stamp on this 2 hours off of local time?

    Remem­ber, I live in Baghdad–well, the green zone at least…It is just before 6 am but the stamp shows just before 4am—that puts your local time some­where in Europe or central-west africa.

    Not many peo­ple man­u­ally set their local, com­puter, and pro­gram time as dif­fer­ent from real. hhehe…

  4. Jon says:

    She’s an Iraqi expa­tri­ate, n00b.

  5. Jon says:

    Iraq: Who’s Pulling the Wool Over Our Eyes?
    By Linda Heard
    March 21, 2006

    Iraqi Pres­i­dent Jalal Tal­a­bani says there is no risk of an immi­nent civil war and lauds the fact that Iraqis are enjoy­ing the fruits of democracy.

    The fire­brand Shi­ite cleric Moq­tada Sadr has hinted that the attacks on the shrines in Samarra were the work of for­eign inter­ven­tion­ists and has urged Iraqis to unite against the occu­pa­tion. Para­dox­i­cally Al Sadr’s arch foe Sad­dam Hus­sein made a sim­i­lar com­ment dur­ing his last tri­bunal appear­ance, when the chief judge cut him off in full flight and closed the court­room to the media.

    How can we know who’s telling the truth when almost all of the above have a vested inter­est in the way things in Iraq are going? Whom should we believe?

    Let’s take a look at what the Iraqi blog­gers are say­ing. Per­haps ordi­nary peo­ple can make bet­ter sense of what’s really tak­ing place on the ground.

    This from River­bend, the Girl­blog from Iraq:

    Three years, and the elec­tric­ity is worse than ever. The secu­rity sit­u­a­tion has gone from bad to worse. The coun­try feels like it’s on the brink of chaos once more — but a pre-planned, pre-fabricated chaos being led by reli­gious mili­tias and zealots.

    An entry dated March 17 on the Bagh­dad Trea­sure blogspot illus­trates the writer’s intense disillusionment.

    When Saddam’s statue was downed, I was stunned. Oh my God! Sad­dam is gone. We are free. Yes, we are free. The Amer­i­cans lib­er­ated us. I was so happy. A huge bur­den was removed. We can work, study, have fun and live like oth­ers. I did not expect that I was too opti­mistic to the extent that I believed what was said. When I first saw the US Army in the streets, I said these are the ones who broke all the locks with which Sad­dam and his gang has impris­oned us. I didn’t know that the locks com­ing later are big­ger and much big­ger than Saddam’s.

    If we believe what res­i­dents of Iraq are say­ing on their blogs — and here I should point out that sev­eral of the above set out as sup­port­ers of the inva­sion — then it is clear that the words of Cheney and Reid ring hol­low. The sit­u­a­tion in Iraq is not hunky dory as they would have us believe, and Talabani’s asser­tion that Iraqis are enjoy­ing their new­found democ­racy should def­i­nitely be taken with a large shov­el­ful of salt.

    There is surely only one con­clu­sion for any sane per­son to reach. The inva­sion of Iraq and its sub­se­quent occu­pa­tion has emerged as one of the most tragic events through­out his­tory. It was an exer­cise con­ducted on lies and pro­pa­ganda, which are con­tin­u­ing even today in an attempt to per­suade West­ern publics that there is a core of nobil­ity amid the sham. The day is soon com­ing that they, like the Iraqi peo­ple, can no more be fooled. That day can’t come soon enough.

    Until the lead­ers of the occu­pa­tion forces admit to them­selves and the world what a ter­ri­ble blun­der has been com­mit­ted, noth­ing can be done to put things right. Like addicts must face harsh real­ity before they can be cured, so must the war­mon­ger who cre­ated this tragic debacle.