In Beirut

Hi all

I am in Beirout right bow, I am writ­ing about the press con­fer­ence by Bushra Khalil (female meme­ber of Saddam’s defense team) yes­ter­day here in beirout.

I just wanted to add this before I leave

from read­ing the com­ments, I noticed many (mostly Amer­i­cans) use the word (Left or Leftie), I know it’s a kind of vir­tual war between Left and Right in the US but in Europe and the rest of the world it’s more com­pli­cated than this.

Take Tony Blair for exam­ple he is a (Leftie as you describe) but he is no less ruth­less than Bush.

At the mean­time, enjoy this great Voodoo piece from Miles Davis.

miles

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to In Beirut

  1. Nadia says:

    Hi there LB!!! I am on the other hand writ­ing from our sum­mer house. The inter­net con­nec­tion is thru a modem. It is extremely slow. Nor­mally I take a break from the Inter­net while here. But now I had to log on and I couldn’t keep away from your site, wanted to see your updates! Miles Davis’s music is com­ing out from the com­puter now and at the same time I hear my jazz lov­ing hus­band train­ing on his trum­pet in the attic! He has been part of a Big Band for many years. If if was up to him a Miles Davis poster would be on every wall in our home. Luck­ely I have a say too! :)

    Got to Go, take care LadyBird!

  2. LadyBird says:

    Hi Nadia
    Hehehe, you are also in vaca­tion??, good for you,

    :) take care

  3. Michael says:

    Here’s an ear­lier report from Octo­ber 2004

    http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/10-17a-04.asp

    Zar­qawi killed in Iraq
    Bal­aji Reddy, Spe­cial Cor­re­spon­dent
    Octo­ber 16, 2004

  4. Charles says:

    Mike,

    Here is a quote from your 2004 link:

    The U.S. mil­i­tary said on Sat­ur­day that reports that Jor­dan­ian mil­i­tant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi had been detained in Iraq were not cred­i­ble.

    As usual ayou don’t even read your own links.

    Maybe we did get him this time — or at least we got his clone (match­ing fin­ger­prints, pic­ture, etc.).

    This of course does not mean the vio­lence inspired by this deceased sack of pus will end — but it is cer­tainly a GOOD THING.

    Piss be upon him and all of his followers.

    Peace to Iraq.

    Free beer and rejoic­ing to the joint team that took him down.

    Pros­per­ity and health to the folks who turned him in!

  5. rightwing extremist says:

    I just wanted to add this before I leave

    from read­ing the com­ments, I noticed many (mostly Amer­i­cans) use the word (Left or Leftie), I know it’s a kind of vir­tual war between Left and Right in the US but in Europe and the rest of the world it’s more com­pli­cated than this.

    Take Tony Blair for exam­ple he is a (Leftie as you describe) but he is no less ruth­less than Bush.”

    ok, this started off sound­ing both sane and interesting…it then went quickly down­hill. first of all, it is patently ridicu­lous to refer to blair as “extreme”.

    sec­ond we use terms like “left” and “leftie” because they are appro­pri­ate when refer­ring to the self-hatred of peo­ple like KB, Nadia and Michael.

  6. jeremy says:

    Here’s my inter­pre­ta­tion of what LB was say­ing when she wrote this:

    from read­ing the com­ments, I noticed many (mostly Amer­i­cans) use the word (Left or Leftie), I know it’s a kind of vir­tual war between Left and Right in the US but in Europe and the rest of the world it’s more com­pli­cated than this.

    Yah, things are real com­pli­cated else­where in the world aren’t they… its the mind­frame of

    “We hate Amer­ica, yet we wish we could all live there. We watch all the movies from there, and lis­ten to the music pro­duced there too. We eat McDon­alds and go to Dis­ney theme parks. But we hate the Amer­i­cans! Why, because we’re jeal­ous. And we expect them to help us when­ever we have a prob­lem with any­thing. We’ll love them then but with time we’ll turn around and spit in their faces because we expected them to be per­fect and they weren’t. It was a con­spir­acy that they even came here to begin with. Down with the Amer­i­cans– The Great Satan! We pre­fer being told what to do by our lead­ers. We are robotic sheep and we hate the Amer­i­cans. Lets build a bomb and hijack a plane! Allah Akbar!”

    It doesn’t seem so com­pli­cated to me. I have morals and an edu­ca­tion and can see right through these peo­ple. They can kiss my ass for all I care.

  7. jeremy says:

    Here’s a more “com­pli­cated” exam­ple of pol­i­tics in the Mid­dle East as brought for­ward by LB:

    1) Sunni bombs Kurd
    2) Kurd bombs Shi­ite
    3) Shi­ite bombs Sunni
    4) Kurd bombs Shi­ite
    5) Shi­ite bombs Kurd
    6) Sunni bombs Shi­ite
    7) Kurd bombs Sunni
    8) Shi­ite bombs Sunni (whoops already used that one. Oh well, I guess it hap­pens more than once.)

    They should design a pair of dice with the dif­fer­ent sects on the faces to roll who kills who next. That way it wouldn’t be so complicated.

  8. Michael says:

    But Jeremy you missed the most impor­tant one.

    Amer­i­cans bomb everyone.

  9. Michael says:

    Right wing loonie writes

    Actu­ally he’s thought of more as a poo­dle who wags his tail on com­mand. He’s to Bush what Mus­solini was to Hitler.

  10. jeremy says:

    They bomb every­one huh Michael? Includ­ing you too? There you go over­stat­ing things again. You prob­a­bly wish we did bomb you so you’d go to mar­tyr hell with the rest of the freaks. You’re just pissed off because your life sucks. You’re a jeal­ous, brain­washed zealot.

  11. jeremy says:

    Mus­solini was to Hitler as what Michael is to Jon. They’re both hate­mon­gers but Jon pissed off a lot more peo­ple on this blog than Michael. Step up Mikie, you need to take a hint from your Al Qaeda bud­dies and replace Jon like another rad­i­cal mus­lim will replace Al Zar­qawi. Ah… another day… another ter­ror­ist gets his ass blown in half by a 500 pound Amer­i­can bomb. i love it. Sorry we’re win­ning Mikey. I hope you don’t cry.

  12. Michael says:

    Jeremy writes “both hate­mon­gers but Jon pissed off a lot more peo­ple on this blog than Michael.”

    It’s not Jon or I that sup­ports a pres­i­dent who is so far the biggest mass mur­derer in the 21st century.

  13. Michael says:

    love it. Sorry we’re win­ning Mikey. I hope you don’t cry.”

    Not quite Jeremy, you think you are win­ning. Just look at your trade fig­ures issued yes­ter­day which show another record deficit.
    That’s how the New­World­Nazis will be defeated, by peo­ple all over the world boy­cotting Yan­qui goods and dump­ing the rapidly devalu­ing US$.

  14. Jon says:

    I take a cou­ple of days off from post­ing and a cou­ple of sawed-off Nazi-wannabes run amuck on the site.

    Michael, you shouldn’t waste your time in third-grade piss­ing matches with these losers. They just want to dis­tract every­one from the real issue… George Bush’s respon­si­bil­ity for the ille­gal inva­sion and occu­pa­tion of a sov­er­eign nation which has resulted in the deaths of hun­dreds of thou­sands of inno­cent peo­ple. You should be ham­mer­ing that point home in response to every right-wing com­ment. I’ve got a ton of stuff going on lately and I can’t be here all the time any­more to keep the con­ver­sa­tion on point.

    Jeremy — “Jon pissed off a lot more peo­ple on this blog”

    Only a lit­tle Nazi wannabe would get snitty the way you do over some­one speak­ing their mind. Both you and RWE are losers of the low­est order. You two come across as barely lit­er­ate. Didn’t you say you were leav­ing and not com­ing back a month or so ago? Must not be a man of your word. The worst part about peo­ple like you is that you’re too chick­en­shit to speak your minds in pub­lic, so you troll the blogs. You’re a waste of band­width and Lady­Bird would be wise to delete your worth­less dri­vel from the site.

  15. jeremy says:

    Jon,

    Only a lit­tle Nazi wannabe would get snitty the way you do over some­one speak­ing their mind.”

    And just what are you doing by say­ing that? You’re not snitty? What a crock of shit, just like every other thing you key in with your worth­less pipebomb build­ing hands. You’re a hyp­ocrite and a cave dweller just like the rest of the jihadists. The evi­dence you gather (which is BS) is slanted to the left from the very first glance. Too bad your pea-sized brain can’t be changed to see things the way they really are. By the way, ask­ing Lady­bird to remove my com­ments clearly shows your Com­mu­nist total­i­tar­ian atti­tude of cen­sor­ship and cow­ardice. You’re noth­ing but a trai­tor to the good of the world and for all I care you can rot in hell with the rest of your martyr-wannabe, bottom-feeding, socio­pathic friends. By the way you’re never on point, you instead appear to be on the edge of men­tal col­lapse; per­fectly evi­dent by your delu­sion­ary atti­tude and evil, twisted thoughts. And I’d rather be a waste of band­width than a waste of oxy­gen like you mis­ter junior Al Qaeda. You can kiss TRUE Amer­i­cans asses like mine when­ever you feel the temp­ta­tion. Your motive for twist­ing facts is out of pure jeal­ousy and anger-fueled stu­pid­ity. You believe every lit­tle con­spir­acy you hear because you’re a pissed off lit­tle sheep, just try­ing to find some way to try to pay the world back for all the “injus­tices” imposed on you. So that would make you self­ish as well. You’re a typ­i­cal lib­eral. You have to scream to get your voice across to oth­ers, I can sit back and let God do the work. I know the way that I feel is the right way, and thats what it comes down to, whats right and whats wrong. I’m always open-minded enough to accept argu­ments that con­tra­dict mine if they are indeed hon­est and fac­tual. But your whole argu­ment Jon, is fuckin sick, pathetic, and so far out in left field that Barry Bonds couldn’t reach it if he was swing­ing a cork-filled bat at a three hun­dred mph fast­ball. Either that or he’d swing and miss the ball (your argu­ment) alto­gether. You’re noth­ing but a drain on the val­ues of soci­ety. So pack up up your fake papers, ammo­nium nitrate, and blast­ing caps and hit the bricks in your Ryder van mar­tyr boy.

  16. jeremy says:

    Mikey–

    Mar­kets fluc­tu­ate. There are cycles. Go read your high school eco­nom­ics text­book and turn to page 1. Its there in bold­face print.

    Do you really think our mar­ket is going to col­lapse? I don’t think so… Amer­i­cans are very pro­duc­tive because we have the free­dom of mobil­ity within our soci­ety. We are vir­tu­ous as well. Quit being so gosh-darn jealous.

  17. jeremy says:

    By the way Michael, at least we’re brave enough to do some­thing about ter­ror­ism. You’re such a cow­ard and a fol­lower that you’d join them like an idiot. Then you’d get to feel the wrath just like Al-Zarqawi did. Now go back to blow­ing up tun­nels on your model train set so you can feel big

  18. jeremy says:

    Jon–
    A trai­tor like you couldn’t pos­si­bly be a man of his word. Unless it meant it would ben­e­fit you and only you. For exam­ple, blow­ing up inno­cent women and chil­dren because it would make you a mar­tyr. Truly self­ish in every sense of the word.

  19. jeremy says:

    Jon–

    A ques­tion regard­ing your article:

    Do ter­ror­ists fol­low the rules of war?

    Just answer the ques­tion and don’t beat around the bush.

    I believe the rules have changed in this war and with just cause. I want my fam­ily to sleep safe tonight, plain and sim­ple. The ter­ror­ists pro­voked us first, and by doing so they shaped their own des­tiny. You, Jon, can’t seem to draw the line between sym­pa­thy for the ter­ror­ists and jus­tice for the Amer­i­cans and the rest of the world affected my these jihadist mon­sters. I feel no sym­pa­thy for a ter­ror­ist, even if he’s stacked up naked in a pyra­mid with a dog in his mug. If he doesn’t like it, then he should think twice before plot­ting to kill inno­cent Amer­i­cans. Quit feel­ing sorry for these peo­ple. They are the low­est of the low.

    Now am I being lit­er­ate enough for you, or are you just too angry and stu­pid to under­stand what I’m try­ing to say?

  20. Jon says:

    Jeremy — “And just what are you doing by say­ing that? You’re not snitty?”

    I’m not both­ered by your inane com­ments. I’m not being snitty. I’m mak­ing a sci­en­tific obser­va­tion. You’re a poser fas­cist. You jump behind the Bush admin­is­tra­tion because you don’t grasp the situation.

    What you don’t seem to under­stand is that Iraq does not exist under the aegis of the United States. The US has no author­ity in Iraq. Iraq was no threat to the United States, so by vio­lently invad­ing, the United States waged a “war of aggression”.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_aggression

    If you would like to exam­ine the legal code regard­ing such mat­ters, here is an excel­lent article.

    http://www.westpointgradsagainstthewar.org/laws_and_treatıes_violated_by_pr.htm

    George Bush is not above the law. George Bush is a crim­i­nal and should be pros­e­cuted as such.

    Do you see the pro­gres­sion of steps that I’ve made in my argu­ment? That is called the log­i­cal process. You should prac­tice this sort of rea­son­ing so that you can develop a cogent posi­tion on the top­ics you’re debat­ing. As it stands, all you are doing is rant­ing about sit­u­a­tions that you obvi­ously don’t understand.

    I can tell from your posts that you are scared, but that is no excuse for sup­port­ing crim­i­nal actions. This dis­re­gard of human suf­fer­ing in order to pro­vide your­self with a slightly greater false sense of secu­rity is evi­dence that you are com­pletely lack­ing in honor. That is not very manly of you.

    with your worth­less pipebomb build­ing hands”

    I have to warn you about some­thing. You are obvi­ously not legally sophis­ti­cated, so I’ll just write these com­ments off as a result of your igno­rance about how to act in pub­lic. If you post com­ments sug­gest­ing that I took part in crim­i­nal activ­i­ties when I did not, you are com­mit­ting the crime of libel. Any time the word “trai­tor” comes out of your key­board, you’ve falsely accused me of a crime and that’s illegal.

    I know you think you are all invis­i­ble in your lit­tle bed­room down the hall from mom and dad, but, trust me, you’re not.

    The evi­dence you gather (which is BS) is slanted to the left from the very first glance.”

    Most news, if not all, is edi­to­ri­al­ized to some extent. The evi­dence I present is in the form of arti­cles or edi­to­ri­als. The news can be edi­to­ri­al­ized as long as opin­ion is not pre­sented as fact. It’s legal. Fox News does this stuff constantly.

    What I try to do is post lib­er­tar­ian lean­ing arti­cles. You think I lean left only because your own opin­ions are so far to the extreme right. That means that any­thing which con­tra­dicts your opin­ion, you will see as com­ing from the left.

    So, it’s not me who is a left­ist. I am a lib­er­tar­ian. And you, being on the far right are known as a fas­cist. That’s the sci­en­tific def­i­n­i­tion for your polit­i­cal posi­tion, so don’t get aggri­vated. I just insist on using the proper terminology.

    ask­ing Lady­bird to remove my com­ments clearly shows”

    This blog isn’t a democ­racy. You are a blog troll. The proper treat­ment for blog trolls is to delete their pres­ence so that the adults can get back on with the dis­cus­sion. Lady­Bird is more than famil­iar with the con­cept of blog trolls are how to block their access, so I’m sure it’s a triv­ial thing to get rid of you.

    Com­mu­nist total­i­tar­ian atti­tude of cen­sor­ship and cowardice”

    You wouldn’t know a com­mu­nist of Marx kicked you in the ass. Being a lib­er­tar­ian, I am not in favor of gov­ern­ment cen­sor­ship. How­ever, on this par­tic­u­lar non-democratic, pri­vate site, Lady­Bird is monarch.

    You’re noth­ing but a trai­tor to the good of the world”

    You have dis­re­garded the well-being of all human­ity to ensure your own stan­dard of liv­ing. You back a pres­i­dent who orders the deaths of peo­ple he knows to be inno­cent. I don’t think you’re in a good posi­tion to claim an inter­est in goodness.

    for all I care you can rot in hell with the rest of your martyr-wannabe, bottom-feeding, socio­pathic friends.”

    Oh, no. Skinhead-in-training don’t like me. How will I ever go on.

    you instead appear to be on the edge of men­tal col­lapse; per­fectly evi­dent by your delu­sion­ary atti­tude and evil, twisted thoughts.”

    Are you start­ing to fall for your own dri­vel? Are you begin­ning to think that mass mur­der of inno­cent peo­ple is good and holy? Did your mom raise you in the satanic church or some­thing? I think your head is on backwards.

    I’d rather be a waste of band­width than a waste of oxy­gen like you mis­ter junior Al Qaeda”

    Nice come­back mis­ter junior High School.

    You can kiss TRUE Amer­i­cans asses like mine when­ever you feel the temptation.”

    It’s sad that you don’t real­ize that you’ve entirely ceased to be an Amer­i­can and are now just a Repub­li­can. You don’t give a rats ass about the future of this nation. All you care about is your own scrawny hide. You’re weak.

    Your motive for twist­ing facts is out of pure jeal­ousy and anger-fueled stupidity.”

    Jeal­ousy? Of what? Liv­ing the red­neck high-life like you? Wooo. You go, boy. I’ll stick to my own upper middle-class, sub­ur­ban YANKEE lifestyle, thanks.

    As far as anger-fueled stu­pid­ity goes, if you believe I’m wrong, present your case. You can’t because you don’t have one. You pas­sion­ately believe through a sense of faith. Faith is defined as, “Belief that does not rest on log­i­cal proof or mate­r­ial evi­dence.” You are not bas­ing your tirades on logic because your opin­ions are not founded in fact. Your whole belief sys­tem couldn’t be fur­ther from reality.

    You believe every lit­tle con­spir­acy you hear because you’re a pissed off lit­tle sheep”

    I don’t believe every con­spir­acy the­ory. But I also don’t dis­miss the pos­si­bil­ity of con­spir­a­cies out of hand as you do. When you dis­miss con­spir­acy the­o­ries with­out con­sid­er­a­tion, then you have inten­tion­ally made your­self naive. In other words, it is you who is the sheep.

    Well, you took a swing, but you whiffed it. I know you were hop­ing that I was some kind of mal­con­tent, but I’m not. I’m liv­ing exactly the life I want to live. The rea­son I’m oppos­ing the war in Iraq is entirely due to the fact that it is a crim­i­nal action.

    So that would make you self­ish as well.”

    That was the lamest ad hominem attack I’ve ever seen.

    You’re a typ­i­cal liberal.”

    I hate to shat­ter your bub­ble, but being called a lib­eral doesn’t phase me. One rea­son is that I’d much rather be a lib­eral than a fasist. And the other rea­son is that because I know that you have no idea what the word “lib­eral” means as it occurs in the con­text of Amer­i­can politics.

    You have to scream to get your voice across to oth­ers, I can sit back and let God do the work.”

    Now there’s an atti­tude that’ll make this alleged God of yours happy. You’re the low­est of the low. You call your­self a Chris­t­ian and you sup­port the exact oppo­site of what is con­sid­ered to be Chris­t­ian phi­los­o­phy. The truth is that you are back­ing the alleged devil and you don’t even know it.

    I know the way that I feel is the right way”

    I know you do. That’s because you have a “Type 1 per­son­al­ity”. Here is a brief desrip­tion of you…

    Type 1, Level 6-Highly crit­i­cal both of self and oth­ers: picky, judg­men­tal, per­fec­tion­is­tic. Very opin­ion­ated about every­thing: cor­rect­ing peo­ple and bad­ger­ing them to “do the right thing”—as they see it. Impa­tient, never sat­is­fied with any­thing unless it is done accord­ing to their pre­scrip­tions. Mor­al­iz­ing, scold­ing, abra­sive, and indig­nantly angry.

    That’s you in a nutshell.

    whats right and whats wrong”

    Sadly, you’ve lost track of what is right and wrong. Not only is wag­ing a war of aggres­sion wrong, it’s ille­gal too.

    always open-minded enough to accept argu­ments that con­tra­dict mine if they are indeed hon­est and factual.”

    That’s a bald-faced lie. You are indoc­tri­nated. You don’t even con­sider any rea­son­ing that is not issued to you from your pro­tec­tive author­ity (father) figures.

    But your whole argu­ment Jon, is fuckin sick, pathetic”

    Do you still believe that you’re sane? If you refer to the strug­gle for peace as sick and pathetic, you’ve got screws loose.

    You’re noth­ing but a drain on the val­ues of society.”

    Here’s an inter­est­ing lit­tle fact for you… did you know that both Hitler and GWB Jr ran on a “fam­ily val­ues” plat­form? When you men­tion “the val­ues of soci­ety”, are you refer­ring only to the value of white families?

    For exam­ple, blow­ing up inno­cent women and chil­dren because it would make you a martyr.”

    I defy you to pro­duce one exam­ple of my sup­port of ter­ror­ism. You’re a damn liar, noth­ing more.

    A ques­tion regard­ing your arti­cle: Do ter­ror­ists fol­low the rules of war?”

    Do you think that our gov­ern­ment is released from it’s oblig­a­tion to act within the lim­its of the law sim­ply because we decided to declare war on peo­ple who are not sig­na­to­ries of the Geneva con­ven­tions and UN Char­ter, etc?

    The truth is that less than one per­cent of all those who have died as a result of the US’ ille­gal war of aggres­sion on Iraq could be clas­si­fied legally as ter­ror­ists. The rest are mostly civil­ians and some insurgents.

    I believe the rules have changed in this war and with just cause.”

    Well, you’d be dead wrong, my friend. The rules are still in effect. Vio­la­tors will be prosecuted.

    I want my fam­ily to sleep safe tonight, plain and simple.”

    You don’t real­ize that the sad part is that you don’t give a rats ass about any­one elses fam­ily. You’d sac­ri­fice inno­cent chil­dren to cover your own ass. You lack honor. You’re not a man.

    The ter­ror­ists pro­voked us first”

    Your one of those extremely thick-skulled peo­ple who still haven’t caught on to the fact that Iraq had no involve­ment in 9/11. If you don’t believe me, read the 9/11 Com­mis­sion report.

    can’t seem to draw the line between sym­pa­thy for the ter­ror­ists and jus­tice for the Amer­i­cans and the rest of the world affected my these jihadist monsters”

    Is it pos­si­ble that you’re a racist? Maybe you just don’t give a crap about peo­ple with brown skin or some­thing. My sym­pa­thies lie with the hun­dreds of thou­sands of inno­cent peo­ple that George Bush and his fol­low­ers have killed.

    I feel no sym­pa­thy for a terrorist”

    I am bet­ting that you can’t feel sym­pa­thy at all. You show all the signs of a sociopath.

    even if he’s stacked up naked in a pyra­mid with a dog in his mug.”

    “Who­ever fights mon­sters should see to it that in the process he does not become a mon­ster.“
    –Friedrich Nietzsche

    Jeremy, you have become that which you sought to destroy. You’re a mon­ster. I’m not say­ing that to be mean. You’ve ceased to regard human­ity and you’ve lost your human­ity in the process.

    If he doesn’t like it, then he should think twice before plot­ting to kill inno­cent Americans.”

    You’ve been bam­boo­zled. The peo­ple being abused in the Abu Ghraib scan­dled weren’t ter­ror­ists. They were inno­cent vic­tims. They were vio­lently and sex­u­ally abused and even raped. You are con­don­ing crim­i­nal activ­ity. That is a clas­sic socio­pathic log­i­cal process you have.

    Quit feel­ing sorry for these peo­ple. They are the low­est of the low.”

    You’ve got to be one of the 10 most igno­rant indi­vid­u­als I’ve ever run across. It’s sad really. You have no regard for any­one other than your­self, do you?

    Now am I being lit­er­ate enough for you, or are you just too angry and stu­pid to under­stand what I’m try­ing to say?”

    I under­stood your fas­cist ide­ol­ogy the first time you posted a com­ment. If you think you’re going to recruit me, you’ve miscalculated.

  21. jeremy says:

    Jon–

    Nice reply Sig­mund Freud. You evi­dently believe you are actu­ally smart, don’t you. I only care about myself? No, its just that you’re too big of a pussy to fight back against ter­ror. When they come for you and your fam­ily, they won’t want to give you a hug. Your mind will change will real fast. These peo­ple are ruth­less killers. You’re just a cry­baby like the rest of the lib­er­als. Your mind­frame is always to “strate­gize, and think of some other type of a solu­tion to the prob­lem”. Mean­while peo­ple are being killed by ter­rror­ists, and their land is being invaded by ille­gal aliens and you just want to sit there and think about what we can do about it. How’s about mak­ing a real deci­sion and stick­ing by it? Thats why Kerry lost the last elec­tion… because he couldn’t ever make up his mind, just like Hillary.

  22. Jon says:

    its just that you’re too big of a pussy to fight back against terror…When they come for you and your family”

    Buddy, you are the one who is dis­play­ing a dis­tinct lack of courage here. You’re sug­gest­ing that the US bomb­ing to death hun­dreds of thou­sands of inno­cent civil­ians is an appro­pri­ate response to a ter­ror attack. You’re not a man. You’re a lit­tle chick­en­shit. Sit­ting scared in your lit­tle house ter­ri­fied that the mus­lims are com­ing to get him. You need a real­ity check, my friend.

    Your mind will change will real fast.”

    Even if mus­lims tak­ing over the world was a pos­si­bil­ity, which a sane indi­vid­ual would real­ize that it is not, my reac­tion to it wouldn’t be to kill peo­ple who had no involve­ment whatsoever.

    These peo­ple are ruth­less killers.”

    So, your idea of a good plan was what exactly? A shock and awe bomb­ing cam­paign to kill thou­sands of inno­cent men, women and chil­dren? You think you can out-ruthless crim­i­nals like this? You’re nut­tier than a fruitcake.

    You’re just a cry­baby like the rest of the liberals.”

    Right. You act like the mur­der of hun­dreds of thou­sands of inno­cent civil­ians is a small thing. You must cer­tainly have some type of anti-social per­son­al­ity disorder.

    Your mind­frame is to react to every sit­u­a­tion with force and vio­lence. The real­ity of the sit­u­a­tion is that you’re only mak­ing things worse.

    Mean­while peo­ple are being killed by terrrorists”

    And peo­ple are being killed on US bomb­ing raids. What’s your point? Actual ter­ror­ists need to be dealt with like any other crim­i­nal. Your prob­lem is that, in your mind, all Arabs are ter­ror­ists. You are a bigot. Your racism has man­i­fested itself as “Islamophobia”.

    and their land is being invaded by ille­gal aliens”

    Iraqis can take care of them­selves. They don’t want your help. They don’t need your help. They want the US out of their affairs.

    you just want to sit there and think about what we can do about it”

    I never said any­thing about just sit­ting around on our thumbs. There is plenty we can do to con­tain the threat of ter­ror­ism with­out even leav­ing US soil. The threat of ter­ror­ism is a law enforce­ment issue. It is best han­dled covertly with no mess and with­out the destruc­tion of the lives of inno­cent peo­ple. You have got­ten it into your mind that the war on Iraq was a response to 9/11 and you couldn’t be fur­ther from the truth. Iraq was not involved. You’re sup­port­ing the slaugh­ter of hun­dreds of thou­sands of inno­cent peo­ple. That kind of thing has to carry some bad karma with it.

    How’s about mak­ing a real deci­sion and stick­ing by it?”

    What you are refer­ring to is called “being stub­born”. Being stub­born when you’re wrong is not a good qual­ity. Some­one should have taught that to you a cou­ple of years ago when you were in kindergarten.

    Thats why Kerry lost the last election”

    Kerry lost the last elec­tion because he was bor­ing as hell and Amer­i­cans want some enter­tain­ment for their tax dol­lars. Ide­o­log­i­cally, Kerry and Bush are not far from each other. They are both right-wing con­ser­v­a­tives, believe it or not, and sci­en­tif­i­cally clas­si­fied as fascists.

    because he couldn’t ever make up his mind, just like Hillary”

    Another fas­cist mis­tak­enly referred to as a lib­eral. She wants to build the nanny state as much as you peo­ple want to build your Chris­t­ian theocracy.

  23. jeremy says:

    Jon–

    You used the phrase “ad hominem” ear­lier, of which you are clearly the king.

    You think I’m a racist because I sup­port the war on ter­ror, because the major­ity of it takes place in the Mid­dle East. I haven’t seen any Al Qaeda train­ing camps in the U.S. have you? We are tak­ing care of the issue within our own bor­ders, that’s why there have been no more attacks here since 9/11. Maybe we want the rest of the world to be safe too. Is that alright with you? We are cre­at­ing a wedge between these jihadist retard mar­tyr wannabe cells by being in their back­yard. If we would have left Iraq Al-Zarqawi would have never been taken out. Who by the way did exist, and was respon­si­ble for the killing of many Amer­i­cans and inno­cent Iraqis. Now if you’re try­ing to imply that you agree with what demons like Al Zar­qawi do then you’ve lost the argu­ment, plain and simple.

    Pulling the race card on me when I asso­ciate with peo­ple of dif­fer­ing races and faiths on a daily basis makes your argu­ment invalid. Sorry, you lose.

  24. jeremy says:

    Jon–
    Kerry a con­ser­v­a­tive? Thats absolutely ridicu­lous. Well unless you’re an anarchist.

  25. Jon says:

    Kerry a con­ser­v­a­tive? Thats absolutely ridiculous.”

    You only think that because you don’t know the dif­fer­ence between left and right.

    Well unless you’re an anarchist.”

    Anar­chism isn’t a polit­i­cal phi­los­o­phy. It is the rejec­tion of pol­i­tics and gov­ern­ment con­trol alto­gether. Most peo­ple who say they are anar­chists are just posers who think anar­chy is radical.

    I am a lib­er­tar­ian. Thomas Paine once said, “That gov­ern­ment is best which gov­erns least.” This state­ment rep­re­sents the lib­er­tar­ian ide­ol­ogy per­fectly. Anar­chism is eas­ily mis­taken for lib­er­tar­i­an­ism because anar­chists believe the per­fect gov­ern­ment is no government.

    Take a look at this chart.

    http://politicalcompass.jpagel.net/images/USelection2004.gif

    You will notice that both Bush and Kerry are clas­si­fied as “author­i­tar­ian right”. The sci­en­tific term for the author­i­tar­ian right is “fas­cist”. They pan­der to “the elite” which are today know as cor­po­ra­tions. Fas­cism is most sim­ply defined as the merg­ing of cor­po­rate and gov­ern­ment interests.