iraq_children

For the first time an Iraqi offi­cial accuses the US and Israel, on cre­at­ing the chaos in Iraq

Al-Mshahadani, head of the Iraqi par­lia­ment [Link in Ara­bic] said:

He pointed out that the first of these groups are the same group who wants to top­ple the state after the top­pling of for­mer regime and wanted Iraq to enter into dark­ness, cre­at­ing a safe pas­sage for the Israelis. [He means the US].

Al-Mshahadani also revealed the following:

The exis­tence of a hid­den Israeli cell in Iraq, try­ing to infil­trate Iraqi polit­i­cal arena

Sec­ond good news is not only for Iraq but for the whole world:

Iraq says to ask U.N. to end US immunity

Iraq will ask the United Nations to end immu­nity from local law for U.S. troops.…We’re very seri­ous about this

ter­ror­ists don’t have immu­nity even if they are wear­ing uniforms.

32 Comments

  1. Grigory Rasputin

    Lady­Bird,

    re: The Great Satans

    In the Mix and Accord­ing the Arab/Islamic Ummah

    which is it?

    Is Israel a proxy appa­rat for United States?

    or

    Is the United States a proxy appa­rat for Israel?

    >:

  2. I have a question:

    Can you split the head of the snake from it’s tail, and keep the snake alive???

  3. Don’t you mean skink? Yes, a skink can be sep­a­rated from it’s tail and survive.

  4. FACTBOX-Developments in Iraq on July 11

    The fol­low­ing are secu­rity devel­op­ments in Iraq on Tues­day as of 1430 GMT.

    Aster­isk denotes a new or updated item.

    *BAGHDAD — Two sui­cide bombers and a road­side bomb killed 15 peo­ple out­side Baghdad’s for­ti­fied Green Zone gov­ern­ment com­pound on Tues­day, the U.S. mil­i­tary said. Iraqi police said ear­lier one sui­cide bomber had killed five and wounded 10.

    BAGHDAD — Gun­men killed eight employ­ees of an Iraqi con­tract­ing com­pany and wounded three after burst­ing into their offices in Baghdad’s west­ern Mansur district.

    BAQUBA — Gun­men killed 19 peo­ple in dif­fer­ent inci­dents in the reli­giously mixed city of Baquba, 65 km (40 miles) north of Bagh­dad, police said.

    BAGHDAD — Gun­men opened fire at a minibus, killing 10 peo­ple and wound­ing one in the south­ern Sunni dis­trict of Bagh­dad, an Inte­rior Min­istry source said.

    BAGHDAD — Gun­men kid­napped Wis­sam Abdulla al-Awadi, an Iraqi con­sul in Iran, from his house in Baghdad’s south­west­ern Ammil dis­trict, police and Inte­rior Min­istry sources said.

    AL-SHIRQAT — Nine Iraqi sol­diers were killed and four wounded on Mon­day when gun­men attacked them in al-Shirqat, 300 km (180 miles) north of Bagh­dad, police said. A civil­ian was wounded in the attack.

    KIRKUK — Gun­men killed an engi­neer work­ing for the North Oil Com­pany, along with his dri­ver, while he was head­ing to work in the north­ern oil city of Kirkuk, police said.

  5. cre­at­ing a safe pas­sage for the Israelis.

    I’m sur­prised it took so long for some­one to take the usual arab stance that every­thing is Israel’s fault.

    As in most things ‘mid­dle east’, it is both laugh­able and tragic at the same time.

    Islamic and baathist ter­ror groups are slaugh­ter­ing Iraqis by the tens of thou­sands — and LB con­curs that it just must be the fault of the joooooos.

    Arabs have this unfor­tu­nate habit of blam­ing all of their prob­lems on some­one else. Any­one will tell you that the only way to solve a prob­lem is to under­stand its com­po­nents and take respon­si­bil­ity. Any­thing that devi­ates from this strat­egy places the solu­tion yet even fur­ther from reach.

    Israel no doubt has a stake in hav­ing Iraq develop into a mod­ern demo­c­ra­tic plu­ral­is­tic soci­ety (as does the rest of the ME and world), but their influ­ence on what is hap­pen­ing is prob­a­bly not per­cept­able rel­a­tive to all of the other players.

  6. Grigory Rasputin

    re: of sneaks, skinks and split­ting Islamic moonbeams.

    ~~~~
    Den­nis Miller

    Arab “Pales­tini­ans” want their own country.

    There’s just one thing about that:

    There are no “Pales­tini­ans”. It’s a made up word. Israel was called Pales­tine for two thou­sand years. Like “Wic­can,” “Pales­tin­ian” sounds ancient but is really a mod­ern inven­tion. Before the Israelis won the land in the 1967 war, Gaza was owned by Egypt, the West Bank was owned by Jor­dan, and there were no “Palestinians.”

    As soon as the Jews took over and started grow­ing oranges as big as bas­ket­balls, what do you know, say hello to the “Pales­tini­ans”, weep­ing for their deep bond with their lost “land” and “nation.”

    So for the sake of hon­esty, let’s not use the word “Pales­tin­ian” any more to describe these delight­ful folks, who dance for joy at our deaths until some­one points out they’re being taped. Instead, let’s call them what they are:
    “Other Arabs Who Can’t Accom­plish Any­thing In Life And Would Rather Wrap Them­selves In The Seduc­tive Melo­drama Of Eter­nal Strug­gle And Death.”

    I know that’s a bit unwieldy to expect to see on CNN. How about this, then: “Adja­cent Jew-Haters.” Okay, so the Adja­cent Jew-Haters want their own coun­try. Oops, just one more thing: No, they don’t. They could’ve had their own coun­try any time in the last thirty years, espe­cially two years ago at Camp David. But if you have your own coun­try, you have to have traf­fic lights and garbage trucks and Cham­bers of Com­merce, and, worse, you actu­ally have to fig­ure out some way to make a living.

    That’s no fun. No, they want what all the other Jew-Haters in the region want: Israel. They also want a big pile of dead Jews, of course –that’s where the real fun is — but mostly they want Israel.

    Why? For one thing, try­ing to destroy Israel — or “The Zion­ist Entity” as their text­books call it — for the last fifty years has allowed the rulers of Arab coun­tries to divert the atten­tion of their own peo­ple away from the fact that they’re the blue-ribbon most illit­er­ate, poor­est, and trib­ally back­ward on God’s Earth, and if you’ve ever been around God’s Earth, you know that’s really say­ing something.

    It makes me roll my eyes every time one of our pun­dits waxes poetic about the great his­tory and cul­ture of the Mus­lim Mid east. Unless I’m miss­ing some­thing, the Arabs haven’t given any­thing to the world since Alge­bra, and, by the way, thanks a hell of a lot for that one.

    Chew this around and spit it out: Five hun­dred mil­lion Arabs; five Mil­lion Jews. Think of all the Arab coun­tries as a foot­ball field, and Israel as a pack of matches sit­ting in the mid­dle of it. And now these same folks swear that if Israel gives them half of that pack of matches, every­one will be pals..

    Really? Wow, what neat news. Hey, but what about the string of wars to oblit­er­ate the tiny coun­try and the con­stant din of rabid blood oaths to drive every Jew into the sea? Oh, that? We were just kidding.

    My friend, Kevin Rooney, made a gor­geous point the other day: Just reverse the num­bers. Imag­ine five hun­dred mil­lion Jews and five mil­lion Arabs. I was stunned at the sim­ple bril­liance of it. Can any­one pic­ture the Jews strap­ping belts of razor blades and dyna­mite to them­selves? Of course not. Or mar­shal­ing every fiber and force at their dis­posal for gen­er­a­tions to drive a tiny Arab State into the sea? Non­sense. Or danc­ing for joy at the mur­der of inno­cents? Impos­si­ble. Or spread­ing and believ­ing hor­ri­ble lies about the Arabs bak­ing their bread with the blood of children?

    Dis­gust­ing.

    No, as you know, left to them­selves in a world of peace, the worst Jews would ever do to peo­ple is debate them to death.

    Mr. Bush, God bless him, is walk­ing a tightrope. I under­stand that with vital oper­a­tions in Iraq and oth­ers, it’s in our inter­est, as Amer­i­cans, to try to sta­bi­lize our Arab allies as much as pos­si­ble, and, after all, that can’t be much harder than sta­bi­liz­ing a room­ful of super mod­els who’ve just had their drugs taken away.

    How­ever, in any big-picture strat­egy, there’s always a dan­ger of los­ing moral weight. We’ve already lost some. After Sep­tem­ber 11th our pres­i­dent told us and the world he was going to root out all ter­ror­ists and the coun­tries that sup­ported them. Beau­ti­ful. Then the Israelis, after months and months of hav­ing the equiv­a­lent of an Okla­homa City every week (and then every day) start to do the same thing we did, and we tell them to show restraint.

    If Amer­ica were being attacked with an Okla­homa City every day, we would all very shortly be scream­ing for the admin­is­tra­tion to just be done with it and kill every­thing
    south of the Mediter­ranean and east of the Jordan.

    Please feel free to pass this along to your friends. Walk in peace! Be Happy! Have a won­der­ful life!

    Den­nis Miller

  7. That does add a bit of perspective.

  8. Sorry typo mis­take [one other rea­son to not use microsoft “word”]

    Cor­rected

  9. Rasputin you have a Jew­ish way of try­ing to re-write his­tory. Pales­tine has existed for over 2000 years, some­times occu­pied it’s true. The only claim the Jews have to Pales­tine is that there were a few wan­der­ing Jews in the area 2,400 years ago.

    That’s only because they stole the water resources, I would like to see them try the same in Death Val­ley and for them all to move to the USA where they will be appre­ci­ated more. The State of Pales­tine has existed in its present form since 1988 and is recog­nised by over two thirds of UN mem­bers, you have to remem­ber of course not every­one recog­nises Israel.

    Israel is a state born out of ter­ror­ism and has attacked their neigh­bours in 1948, 1956,1967, 1973 and 1982, on each occa­sion to grab more land.

    Really? Wow, what neat news. Hey, but what about the string of wars to oblit­er­ate the tiny coun­try and the con­stant din of rabid blood oaths to drive every Jew into the sea? Oh, that? We were just kidding.

    Per­haps you would do bet­ter to review var­i­ous com­ments by Jews regard­ing dri­ving the Arabs into the sea, it’s exactly what they are doing right now. Jews con­sider them­selves the cho­sen ones, in actu­al­ity another “mas­ter race”,just review some of the pas­sages from the Tal­mud and then you just might under­stand a lit­tle bet­ter. Israel is a racist soci­ety far worse in fact than apartheid S. Africa. Israel’s exis­tence is temporary.

  10. A typ­ing mis­take is the fault of the word processor?

    Another exam­ple of blam­ing your shoes for the faults of your feet…

  11. Pales­tine has existed for over 2000 years, some­times occu­pied it’s true.

    Per­ro­quest,

    Please enlighten us as to when the last time ‘Pales­tine’ was an inde­pen­dent state?

    This ancient coun­try you speak of not only lacks its own cul­ture and lan­guage, but it doesn’t even have a name for itself. The name ‘bar­bar­ian lands’ was given to it by the ancient greeks.

    It was just a term used to describe a vast swath of desparately poor geo­graphic ter­ri­tory. Var­i­ous pow­ers then coopted the name through­out his­tory as they took con­trol of the region. Some­times it was not Pales­tine, but rather — ‘lower syria.’ At other times it has gone by com­pletely dif­fer­ent names.

    Now if you want a real cause of a down­trod­den eth­nic­ity that doesn’t have tis own coun­try, try the kurds. They are far and away the largest con­tigu­ous eth­nic group with their own lan­guage and cul­ture who do not have a homeland.

    The only claim the Jews have to Pales­tine is that there were a few wan­der­ing Jews in the area 2,400 years ago.

    That’s funny.

    A hun­dred odd years ago the major­ity of the pop­u­la­tion of ‘Pales­tine’ were lit­er­ally wan­der­ing herders. The vast major­ity of both the Israeli and Arab pop­u­la­tions are immi­grants within the last 100+ years.

    The Pales­tine Man­date was already split giv­ing the arabs 75% of the ter­ri­tory (Jordan).

  12. The Pales­tine Man­date was already split giv­ing the arabs 75% of the ter­ri­tory (Jordan).

    That’s bea­cuse at that time Plares­tine was a part of Jor­dan. But pales­tine has been recognsed as a State since 1988. The fact that Israel fails to recog­nise that fact is besides the point, not every­one recog­nises Israel.

    Pales­tine has existed for milie­ni­ums, for exam­ple if you look on http://www.passia.org/palestine_facts/MAPS/first_zionist_colony.htm you will see men­tioned the first Zion­ist colony in Pales­tine in 1878.

    On http://www.bible-history.com/geography/maps/map_palestine_territory.html there is a “Map of the Ter­ri­tory of Ancient Palestine”

  13. Pales­tine was part of Jordan???

    Jor­dan was renamed from Trans-Jordan, which was the area des­ig­nated as the arab pales­tin­ian home­land. It rep­re­sented over 75% of the Pales­tine Man­date admin­is­tered by the Brits after they took over from the Ottomans after WWI.

    Pales­tine was never ‘part’ of Jor­dan. Jor­dan is a recent invention.

  14. Pales­tine was occu­pied by Jor­dan, but just because a coun­try is occu­pied it doesn’t cease to exist as much as you would like it to.

  15. But pales­tine has been recognsed as a State since 1988.

    http://www.un.org/Overview/unmember.html

    I must have missed it on the list of UN mem­ber states.

    Could you point it out for me on the list of UN mem­ber states please?

    Are you sure it is a UN mem­ber state?

  16. I think Jews only rep­re­sent about 4% of the pop­u­la­tion of the US but they seem to con­trol it. This has hap­pened before in his­tory when a sim­u­lar per­cent­age of Jews con­trolled the Bolchevik/Communist Soviet Union, inter­est­ing don’t you think?

  17. must have missed it on the list of UN mem­ber states.Could you point it out for me on the list of UN mem­ber states please?Are you sure it is a UN mem­ber state?

    I won­der if that could be down to a US veto? :)
    Inci­dently you won’t find the Vat­i­can either.

  18. The vat­i­can has about 100 acres of land.

    Did the US veto recog­ni­tion of Pales­tine as a sov­er­eign country?

    What were the pro­posed borders?

  19. You must review the long list of UN Res­o­lu­tions vetoed by the USA in regards to Pales­tine. Pales­tine is men­tioned in at least 30 so it must exist.

  20. http://www.myisraelsource.com/content/un3326

    UN Res­o­lu­tion 3236Title:
    UN Res­o­lu­tion 3236
    Descrip­tion:
    UN Res­o­lu­tion 3236
    Body text:

    Res­o­lu­tion 3236
    UN Gen­eral Assem­bly 22 Novem­ber 1974

    The Gen­eral Assem­bly Hav­ing con­sid­ered the ques­tion of Pales­tine, Hav­ing heard the state­ment of the Pales­tine Lib­er­a­tion Orga­ni­za­tion, the rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the Pales­tin­ian peo­ple, Hav­ing also heard other state­ments made dur­ing the debate, Deeply con­cerned that no just solu­tion to the prob­lem of Pales­tine has yet been achieved and rec­og­niz­ing that the prob­lem of Pales­tine con­tin­ues to endan­ger inter­na­tional peace and secu­rity, Rec­og­niz­ing that the Pales­tin­ian peo­ple is enti­tled to self-determination in accor­dance with the Char­ter of the United Nations, Express­ing its grave con­cern that the Pales­tin­ian peo­ple has been pre­vented from enjoy­ing its inalien­able rights, in par­tic­u­lar its right to self-determination, Guided by the pur­poses and prin­ci­ples of the Char­ter, Recall­ing its rel­e­vant res­o­lu­tions which affirm the right of the Pales­tin­ian peo­ple to self-determination,

    Reaf­firms the inalien­able rights of the Pales­tin­ian peo­ple in Pales­tine, includ­ing: ( a ) The right to self-determination with­out exter­nal inter­fer­ence; (b) The right to national inde­pen­dence and sov­er­eignty;
    Reaf­firms also the inalien­able right of the Pales­tini­ans to return to their homes and prop­erty from which they have been dis­placed and uprooted, and calls for their return;
    Empha­sizes that full respect for and the real­iza­tion of these inalien­able rights of the Pales­tin­ian peo­ple are indis­pens­able for the solu­tion of the ques­tion of Pales­tine;
    Rec­og­nizes that the Pales­tin­ian peo­ple is a prin­ci­pal party in the estab­lish­ment of a just and last­ing peace in the Mid­dle East;
    Fur­ther rec­og­nizes the right of the Pales­tin­ian peo­ple to regain its rights by all means in accor­dance with the pur­poses and prin­ci­ples of the Char­ter of the United Nations;
    Appeals to all States and inter­na­tional orga­ni­za­tions to extend their sup­port to the Pales­tin­ian peo­ple in its strug­gle to restore its rights, in accor­dance with the Char­ter;
    Requests the Secretary-General to estab­lish con­tacts with the Pales­tine Lib­er­a­tion Orga­ni­za­tion on all mat­ters con­cern­ing the ques­tion of Pales­tine;
    Requests the Secretary-General to report to the Gen­eral Assem­bly at its thir­ti­eth ses­sion on the imple­men­ta­tion of the present res­o­lu­tion;
    Decides to include the item enti­tled “Ques­tion of Pales­tine” in the pro­vi­sional agenda of its thir­ti­eth session.

  21. As I have said before, I’m all for a Pales­tin­ian state in prin­ci­ple. There are many issues to be resolved before this can happen.

    The biggest bar­rier to state­hood I believe is the fact that most (all?) of the Pales­tin­ian terror/liberation groups do not accept Israel. You can try to parse lan­guage and present a case that Pales­tine is or should be a sov­er­eign state. But if we make such a gen­er­ous reach for Pales­tine, then you can­not in the same breath deny full legit­i­macy to Israel. Israel IS a mem­ber state of the UN — and has been since the late 40’s.

    The Pales­tini­ans need to come together and form a con­sen­sus view, and the gov­ern­ment needs to enforce that con­sen­sus view. If its war — let it be war. They will lose. They will com­plain. They will not have a state. But the fault is theirs. If they choose peace­ful coex­is­tence in a 2 state solu­tion, then there is a chance. We haven’t reached even that first step yet.

    You can’t expect the Israelis to make secu­rity con­ces­sions when their own exis­tence is questioned/denied by hos­tile neigh­bors. But in fact they have! They uni­lat­er­ally pulled out of gaza last year. What did the Pales­tini­ans do? They used the newly aquired ter­ri­tory to launch attacks into Israel proper.

  22. More non­sense Char lie, the Israelis haven’t stopped killing Pales­tini­ans and build­ing fur­ther ille­gal set­tle­ments. Even since the Israeli ter­ror­ists has been held as a pris­oner of war, Israel has killed over 60 Pales­tini­ans, destroyed bridges and the elec­tric­ity sup­ply.
    Gaza , after the stage man­aged Israeli with­drawal, was turned into a huge con­cen­tra­tion camp, food sup­plies stopped, med­ical assis­tance refused. Hamas and Pales­tine have already recog­nised Israel, the Jews and peo­ple like you refuse to recog­nise Pales­tin­ian.
    The Jew­ish ter­ror­ists will con­tinue to kill Pales­tini­ans with or with­out resis­tance, Israel isn’t inter­ested in peace, they never have been, just more eth­nic cleans­ing and land grabbing.

  23. Not reported by today’s events in Iraq

    A side road bomb exploded near an Amer­i­can mil­i­tary hum­mer on the road between Kar­bala and Hindya caused a total destruc­tion of the vehi­cle, eye­wit­ness said.

    US forces sur­rounded the area pre­vented the eye­wit­ness to see if there were any casualties.

    Link in Arabic

  24. Israeli army killed 951 Pales­tin­ian chil­dren and minors since Sep­tem­ber 2000

    http://ptimes.org/Main/default.aspx?_ContentType=ART&_ContentID=5419184a-aae7-445e-9994-597cbb5fe912

    The Israeli occu­pa­tion army and para­mil­i­tary Jew­ish set­tlers have killed 951 Pales­tin­ian chil­dren and minors and have injured in var­ied degrees 18,811 oth­ers since 28 Sep­tem­ber 2000 when the al-Aqsa intifada broke out, accord­ing to an offi­cial report issued Sun­day, 25 June, by the Pales­tin­ian Min­istry of Health.
    The report is based on death cer­tifi­cates issued by Pales­tin­ian hos­pi­tals in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, which Pales­tin­ian health offi­cials say assures its accu­racy and reliability.

    The largely sta­tis­ti­cal report which cov­ers the period from 28 Sep­tem­ber 2001 to 20 June 2006 showed that 387 chil­dren and minors were killed in the West Bank while 564 oth­ers were killed in the Gaza Strip.

    It also showed that num­bers of chil­dren and minors killed by the Israeli army were par­tic­u­larly higher in the first years of the intifada with 187 killed between 28 Sep­tem­ber and 31 Decem­ber 2000; 231 killed in 2001; 176 in 2002; and 180 in 2003.

    In 2004, “only” 61 Pales­tin­ian chil­dren and minors were killed by the Israelis, and in 2005, the fig­ure stood at 84.

    So far this year, 32 Pales­tin­ian chil­dren and minors have been killed, accord­ing to the report. The num­bers of the injured fol­low a sim­i­lar pattern—high dur­ing the first three years of the intifada and then sig­nif­i­cantly lower since the start of 2004.

    As to the age class of the vic­tims, the report pointed out that 18 were 1 year or under; 42 between 1–4 years; 75 between 5–9 years; 255 between 10–14 years; and 561 between 15–18 years.

    The report showed that of the injured, 11,937 were from the West Bank while the rest (or 6,874) were from the Gaza Strip. Of the total injured, at least 7.5% sus­tained per­ma­nent phys­i­cal disabilities.

    The report didn’t cover the psy­cho­log­i­cal and men­tal dam­age sus­tained by chil­dren and minors.

    Other stud­ies, espe­cially by the Gaza­Cen­ter for Men­tal Health, pre­sented stag­ger­ing fig­ures of chil­dren suf­fer­ing from the psy­cho­log­i­cal impact of the vio­lence, with man­i­fes­ta­tions such as neu­ro­sis, depres­sion, pho­bias, panic, and post-traumatic stress.

    Fur­ther­more, the report pointed out that 12 chil­dren and minors were killed by the Israeli army from 1 May to 20 June 2006, while 117 other chil­dren and minors were injured, some crit­i­cally, dur­ing the same period.

    Some of the high-profile killings of Pales­tin­ian chil­dren took place along the Gaza beach on 9 June when an Israeli artillery shell exter­mi­nated six mem­ber of the Ghalia fam­ily, includ­ing four chil­dren. Three more chil­dren were killed a few days later when an Israeli war­plane fired an air-to-ground mis­sile into a crowded street in down­town , killing nine peo­ple includ­ing at least three children.

    All the fig­ures cited in the report are of chil­dren and minors below the age of 18, accord­ing to Dr. Riyad Awad, head of the Health­In­for­ma­tion­Cen­ter, who pre­pared the report.

    The report put the over­all num­ber of Pales­tini­ans killed by the Israeli occu­pa­tion forces and para­mil­i­tary Jew­ish set­tlers since the onset of the Aqsa upris­ing six years ago at 4,234, includ­ing 1,945 in the West Bank, 2,193 in the Gaza Strip, 82 not reg­is­tered and 14 in Israel proper.

    The over­all num­ber of the injured is 57,369, includ­ing 32,379 in the West Bank, 15,555 in the Gaza Strip, 8,435 unreg­is­tered and 1,000 in Israel proper.

    The Israeli B’tselem human rights orga­ni­za­tion put the num­ber of Pales­tini­ans killed by the Israeli army over the past six years at 3,448, includ­ing 700 chil­dren and minors under the age of 18.

    Accord­ing to a B’tselem report issued on 10 June, 1,651 of the Pales­tin­ian vic­tims were not tak­ing part in hos­til­i­ties at the time they were killed.

    It is believed that of the esti­mated 1,000–1,100 Israelis killed by Pales­tini­ans dur­ing the same period, around 100 of them were chil­dren and minors.

    Israeli sources put the num­ber of Israelis injured by Pales­tini­ans at 6,000, the vast bulk of which are believed to have sus­tained minor injuries, includ­ing shock and men­tal trauma.

    Most of the Israeli civil­ian casu­al­ties occurred as a result of sui­ci­dal (or mar­tyr­dom) oper­a­tions inside Israel car­ried out by Pales­tin­ian human bombers.

    Israeli lead­ers and spokes­men, seek­ing to main­tain a higher moral ground vis-à-vis the Pales­tini­ans, insist—especially when talk­ing to for­eign media—that Israeli forces don’t delib­er­ately tar­get Pales­tin­ian civil­ians, espe­cially children.

    How­ever, human rights orga­ni­za­tions, includ­ing Israel’s B’tselem, argue that when civil­ian casu­al­ties are so numer­ous, intent becomes largely irrelevant.

    Besides, Pales­tin­ian advo­cates argue that when ‘mis­takes’ con­tinue to hap­pen nearly on a daily basis, it means they are policy.

  25. Even since the Israeli ter­ror­ists has been held as a pris­oner of war,

    I’m sure you are in denial so I won’t blame you, but I think its impor­tant to point out that Pales­tin­ian mil­i­tants attacked Israel, cap­tured a sol­dier, killed some oth­ers, and also cap­tured and mur­dered a civil­ian. If I am not mis­taken, those are overt acts of war.

    The pris­oner did not magia­cally ‘appear’ in Pale­tin­ian custody.

    So if you com­mit acts of war, you may well get war as a result. Sur­prise surprise!

    Israel has killed over 60 Pales­tini­ans, destroyed bridges and the elec­tric­ity supply.

    Remind me why again? Oh yeah — Pales­tine attacked Israel, killed and cap­tured some sol­diers, and mur­dered some civilians.

  26. I’m sure you are in denial so I won’t blame you, but I think its impor­tant to point out that Pales­tin­ian mil­i­tants attacked Israel.

    No they didn’t , the “attack” took place in occu­pied Pales­tine.
    Since this ille­gal entry into Gaza was planned before the Israeli ter­ror­ist was cap­tured I can’t help think­ing that this was all a ploy by Israel to launch fur­ther ter­ror­ist action.

  27. Stick with vague pro­pa­ganda rhetoric per­ro­quet. You are wrong EVERY SINGLE TIME when it comes to actual facts.

    The attack against Israel was planned and pre­pared months in advance. A tun­nel hun­dreds of meters long was dug under the bor­der. The attack was in Israel.

    I’m not going to call it a ter­ror­ist attack (although I think they cap­tured and mur­dered a cou­ple of civil­ians as well). I think it was a mil­i­tary oper­a­tion by the PAles­tin­ian gov­ern­ment against Israel. It is an act of war. Any attack from Pales­tin­ian ter­ri­to­ries against Israel is an act of war and should be treated accordingly.

  28. The atroc­i­ties car­ried out by Amer­i­can forces in Iraq on a daily basis are noth­ing new, exactly the same thing hap­pened in Vietnam.

    http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/07/one-soldier-cut-off-babys-head-with_11.html


    I’ll give you a hint: You don’t want to know.

    Oper­at­ing largely on their own and only pass­ingly account­able to a chain of com­mand that rarely ven­tured into the jun­gles and pad­dies, these sol­diers ruth­lessly mur­dered hun­dreds of unarmed men, women and chil­dren. One sol­dier cut off a baby’s head with a knife. Vic­tims’ ears were reg­u­larly sliced off, col­lected and fash­ioned into neck­laces which some sol­diers proudly wore. Other vic­tims were scalped. Some were tor­tured. Teeth were kicked out to retrieve the gold from fill­ings.Still can’t fig­ure out who did it?
    Vir­tu­ally all of the civil­ian deaths were reported as “Viet Cong,” even though, oddly, no weapons were ever found and none were ever reported. No offi­cer in com­mand ever ques­tioned this glar­ing dis­par­ity.
    That’s right — US sol­diers. Now, guess who hid it?
    That part of Tiger Force is grim enough. What the Army then did with the evi­dence is shock­ing, and what was cov­ered up in 1974–75 may have sowed the head­lines we are reap­ing in 2006. One of the most thor­ough Crim­i­nal Inves­ti­ga­tion Divi­sion (CID, the Army’s inter­nal FBI) inves­ti­ga­tions ever con­ducted, metic­u­lously gath­ered the facts sur­round­ing the war crimes com­mit­ted by Tiger Force. The evi­dence was volu­mi­nous, cer­tain and had been obtained at the risk of a few inves­ti­ga­tors’ lives.

    In 1974–75, Richard Cheney was a spe­cial assis­tant to Pres­i­dent Ford. Ford’s chief of staff was Don­ald Rums­feld. The sec­re­tary of defense from 1973–75 was James Schlesinger.

    The case was made to dis­ap­pear by these men who served pres­i­dents Nixon and Ford — prob­a­bly out of con­sid­er­a­tions of pol­i­tics. There were never any charges filed against the sol­diers or the offi­cers who ordered and par­tic­i­pated in the rou­tine killing of civil­ians.
    The usual sus­pects are decades deep in their satanic deeds. No doubt, they hid it because they could.
    The only rea­son the case file ever became pub­lic was that the CID offi­cer who directed the inves­ti­ga­tion, and who later com­manded the Crim­i­nal Inves­ti­ga­tion Divi­sion, kept a copy of the inves­ti­ga­tion file, and prior to his death in 2002 made pro­vi­sion for the file to be deliv­ered to a reporter with the Toledo Blade.

    Thirty years later, Mr. Rums­feld refuses to dis­cuss the Tiger Force case. Mr. Cheney declines to dis­cuss much of any­thing. Mr. Schlesinger con­ducted one of the see-no-evil inves­ti­ga­tions at Abu Ghraib. The senior lead­er­ship of the Army and the nation prefers to char­ac­ter­ize war crimes as the work of a few “bad apples.” My Lai was pinned to Lt. William Cal­ley, who suited the bad apple role.

    Tiger Force was far larger, killed three times as many peo­ple, but involved too many “bad apples” and too much gore to main­tain the right story line.

    The com­mon thread which runs from Tiger Force through My Lai, to Guan­tanamo, Bagram and Abu Ghraib, to a hun­dred episodes of sadis­tic bru­tal­ity inflicted by U.S. sol­diers in Iraq, is the remark­able fact that the offi­cial respon­si­bil­ity for all these tragedies never runs higher than the lowest-level trigger-pullers or body-stackers.
    No sur­prise there. Why do your own dirty work WHEN YOU CAN PAY SOMEONE DIRTY MONEY TO DO IT and then blame them when they’re caught redhanded.

    Cheney and Rums­feld are pulling the same sh*t in Iraq today.

    If we don’t do some­thing — FAST — to get these war crim­i­nals out of office and our mil­i­tary out of other coun­tries, inevitably, some­one will make us pay a VERY HIGH PRICE for their unspeak­able crimes — and their phony cur­rency won’t sat­isfy the debt — only our blood will.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. http://www.uruknet.info?p=24538:: The incom­ing address of this arti­cle is :    www.roadstoiraq.com/2006/07/11/good-news-from-iraq/:: The views expressed in this arti­cle are the sole respon­si­bil­ity of the author and do not nec­es­sar­ily reflect those of Uruknet . COMMENTS BY REGISTERED READERS OF URUKNET The under­neath post­ings are under the only respon­s­abil­ity of the authors, and not nec­es­sar­ily we agree with them. If some­one feels that any com­ment con­tains porno­graphic or racist expres­sions, or con­tents con­trary to the law, let us know and — if our legal office con­firms — it will removed asap. […]

Good news from Iraq

This article was written July 11th, 2006, with the mathematical number of 32 contributions.