Most Americans are racists

Accord­ing to this:

Amer­i­cans back anti-terrorism racial pro­fil­ing: poll

Most Amer­i­cans expect a ter­ror­ist attack on the United States in the next few months and sup­port the screen­ing of peo­ple who look “Mid­dle East­ern” at air­ports and train sta­tions, a poll showed on Tuesday.

The Quin­nip­iac Uni­ver­sity Polling Insti­tute said 62 per­cent of Amer­i­cans were “very wor­ried” or “some­what wor­ried” that ter­ror­ists would strike the nation in the next few months while 37 per­cent were “not too wor­ried” or “not wor­ried at all.”

By a 60 per­cent to 37 per­cent mar­gin, respon­dents said author­i­ties should sin­gle out peo­ple who look “Mid­dle East­ern” for secu­rity screen­ing at loca­tions such as air­ports and train sta­tions — a find­ing that drew sharp crit­i­cism by civil lib­er­ties groups.

Which race are these guys?

- Tim­o­thy McVeigh

- Theodore Kaczyn­ski

- Eric Robert Rudolph

- Edgar Ray Killen

- Clay­ton Waagner

- Rollen Stew­art

- Terry Nichols

- George Metesky

- James Charles Kopp

- Luke Helder

- Byron De La Beckwith

- Michael Bray

More names?…just say it

P.S.

Any­body saw Bush speech today?

There were peo­ple applaud­ing in the back­ground after every phrase he said.

I don’t know if they were real peo­ple or pre-recoded applause [like the laughs in sit­coms], but if they were real, then all of them must be charged and impris­oned for cheer­ing death messages.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Most Americans are racists

  1. Jon says:

    Most Amer­i­cans are racists”

    Oy. Now, I’ve got a list for you!

    Islamist Ter­ror Orga­ni­za­tions
    Abu Sayyaf (Philip­pines)
    Aden-Abyan Islamic Army (Yemen)
    Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya (Egypt)
    Armed Islamic Group (Alge­ria)
    Al-Aqsa Mar­tyrs’ Brigades
    Ansar al-Islam (Iraq)
    Al-Qaeda (Afghanistan, Pak­istan, and world­wide)
    Asbat al-Ansar (south­ern Lebanon)
    Jama’at al-Tawhid wa’al-Jihad/Al-Qaeda in Iraq (Iraq)
    Egypt­ian Islamic Jihad — (Egypt)
    Hamas (Israel, West Bank, Gaza Strip)
    Harakat ul-Mujahidin (Pak­istan and Kash­mir)
    Hezbol­lah (Lebanon)
    Hizbul Mujahideen (Pak­istan and Kash­mir)
    Hof­s­tad Net­work (Nether­lands)
    Islamic Front for the Lib­er­a­tion of Bahrain (Bahrain)
    Islamic Move­ment of Cen­tral Asia (Cen­tral Asia)
    Islamic Move­ment of Uzbek­istan (Uzbek­istan)
    Jaish-e-Mohammed (Pak­istan)
    Jaish Ansar al-Sunna (Iraq)
    Jemaah Islamiyah (South­east Asia)
    Jihad Rite (Aus­tralia)
    Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (Pak­istan)
    Lashkar-e-Toiba (Pak­istan)
    Lord’s Resis­tance Army (Uganda)
    Mak­tab al-Khadamat (Afghanistan)
    Moroc­can Islamic Com­bat­ant Group (Morocco and Spain)
    Moro Islamic Lib­er­a­tion Front (Philip­pines)
    Mus­lim Broth­er­hood (inter­na­tional)
    Pales­tin­ian Islamic Jihad (Israel, West Bank, Gaza Strip)
    Salafist Group for Preach­ing and Com­bat (Alge­ria)
    Sipah-e-Sahaba Pak­istan (Pak­istan)
    Tak­fir wal-Hijra (Egypt/Sudan/Algeria)
    Kurdish-Hizbullah (Turkey)
    Al-Barakaat (Al-Qaida front)
    Al-Wafa Human­i­tar­ian Orga­ni­za­tion (Al-Qaida front)
    Benev­o­lence Inter­na­tional Foun­da­tion (Al-Qaida front)
    Global Relief Foun­da­tion (Al-Qaida front)
    Holy Land Foun­da­tion for Relief and Devel­op­ment (Hamas)
    Kon­so­jaya Trad­ing Com­pany (Jemaah Islamiyah front)

    Pales­tin­ian Nation­al­ist Ter­ror Orga­ni­za­tions
    Abu Nidal
    Al-Aqsa Mar­tyrs’ Brigades
    Baloch Mujahideen
    Black Hand
    Black Sep­tem­ber
    Demo­c­ra­tic Front for the Lib­er­a­tion of Pales­tine
    Hamas
    Harakat al-Tahrir al-Watani al-Filastini
    Irgun
    Lehi
    Pop­u­lar Front for the Lib­er­a­tion of Pales­tine
    Pales­tine Lib­er­a­tion Front
    Pop­u­lar Resis­tance Com­mit­tees
    The Holy Jihad Brigade
    Tanzim

    More names?…just say it”

    Mmmmh­m­mmm.

    Any­body saw Bush speech today?”

    Missed it. Any­thing we haven’t heard before?

    then all of them must be charged and impris­oned for cheer­ing death messages”

    The US isn’t an Islamist “repub­lic”. We don’t have any laws against cheer­ing here.

  2. LadyBird says:

    You know what is funny in your list?

    All of them are ter­ror­ists listed by the US only, and all of them funded by the US

  3. Michael says:

    Amer­i­can def­i­n­i­tion of terrorism?

    Any indi­vid­ual or organ­i­sa­tion that gets in the way of the Amer­i­can aim of world domination.

  4. Jon says:

    I’m sure they’re all inno­cent of every­thing… at least under the prin­ci­ples of Islam. 8-O

    Tim­o­thy McVeigh — exe­cuted
    Theodore Kaczyn­ski — life w/out parole
    Eric Robert Rudolph — 5 con­sec­u­tive life sen­tences
    Edgar Ray Killen — 3 con­sec­u­tive 20 year sen­tences
    Clay­ton Waag­ner — 15 to life + 19 years
    Rollen Stew­art — life
    Terry Nichols — life w/out parole
    George Metesky — judged insane and com­mit­ted
    James Charles Kopp — 25 to life
    Luke Helder — judged insane and com­mit­ted
    Byron De La Beck­with — life
    Michael Bray — con­victed of two counts of con­spir­acy and one count of pos­sess­ing unreg­is­tered explo­sive devices, served 46 months

    Now, remind me again what Mus­lim ter­ror­ists get? Oh yeah, they get a mural in their honor.

  5. Jon says:

    Amer­i­can def­i­n­i­tion of terrorism?”

    Islamic def­i­n­i­tion of teror­rism? Defend­ing your­self from Islamic terrorism.

  6. madtom says:

    There were peo­ple applaud­ing in the back­ground after every phrase he said.
    I don’t know if they were real peo­ple or pre-recoded applause [like the laughs in sitcoms],…

    Lady­bird you read my mind. I just saw a part of the speech replayed, and I had the exact same reac­tion, I was about to write some­thing like that on my blog…

    I don’t think they would use a record­ing, they would be caught and ridiculed to no end. What I think they did was to put a head cheer­leader, and had him clap into a micro­phone. There was one clap that was louder that the rest, at least in the video I saw. So he gets the rest clap­ping and it sounds like peo­ple are clap­ping at bush. But the fact is it came off as cheep clap­ping, and it did sound fake.

  7. madtom says:

    As to you list of crim­i­nals, I think Jon did a great job of explain­ing the dif­fer­ence. We get ours and put them away, or we put them under. You guys put them on a pedestal, and pay their fam­i­lies. and the Funny part is that these ter­ror­ist kill 99% more Mus­lims that any­one else. In the end you cheer for your own demise.

    How stu­pid the com­ment about get­ting in our way, when these ter­ror­ist kill mostly you.

  8. Jon says:

    What I think they did was to put a head cheer­leader, and had him clap into a microphone.”

    He pauses for effect. It’s the same thing a come­dian does to elicit laughs from an audi­ence at the appro­pri­ate time.

  9. Jon says:

    Here’s an amus­ing arti­cle about pres­i­den­tial speeching…

    http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/rnc/9780/

  10. Jon says:

    U.N.: Sanc­tions loom, Iran keeps enrich­ing
    August 31, 2006

    The threat of sanc­tions has not con­vinced Iran to stop enrich­ing ura­nium or to com­ply with demands that the Islamic repub­lic prove its pro­gram is peace­ful, a U.N. report said Thursday.

    U.N. ambas­sadors are exam­in­ing a six-page report from Inter­na­tional Atomic Energy Agency Direc­tor Mohammed ElBaradei.

    The report, which has received mixed reac­tions, came on the dead­line set by the Secu­rity Coun­cil for Iran to halt its nuclear activ­i­ties.
    (Watch why Iran’s pro­gram con­cerns the IAEA — 2:48)
    http://www.cnn.com/video/partners/clickability/index.html?url=/video/world/2006/08/31/roth.iaea.iran.report.affl

    Thursday’s dead­line calls for Iran to com­ply with Res­o­lu­tion 1696 and end its nuclear activ­i­ties or face the pos­si­bil­ity of eco­nomic sanc­tions. The report by the IAEA paves the way for Secu­rity Coun­cil sanc­tions against Tehran.

    Iran has insisted that its nuclear pro­gram is for peace­ful civil­ian energy pur­poses. The IAEA could not con­firm that, the report states.

    U.S. Ambas­sador to the United Nations John Bolton cited the report as “ample evi­dence” that Iran was defy­ing the inter­na­tional community.

    The report “con­cludes that after all these years of try­ing, the IAEA is still unable to con­firm the peace­ful nature of Iran’s nuclear pro­gram,” Bolton said.

    But a senior diplo­mat close to the IAEA said that does not prove Iran is try­ing to build nuclear weapons.

    Inspec­tors have not uncov­ered any con­crete proof that Iran’s nuclear pro­gram is of a mil­i­tary nature,” the diplo­mat said. “At the same time, there is a stand­still with regard to the res­o­lu­tion of out­stand­ing issues which would clar­ify the peace­ful nature of Iran’s program.”

    Nuclear reac­tors that are used to pro­duce elec­tric­ity are fueled by a form of ura­nium enriched to a level that is lower than that used for nuclear weapons. Experts say thou­sands of cen­trifuges are needed to pro­duce weapons-grade uranium.

    Iran is using a cas­cade of 164 cen­trifuges to enrich ura­nium, the IAEA reported. Though the rel­a­tively small num­ber implies Iran is not pro­duc­ing weapons-grade ura­nium, the agency says it still wants to know the ori­gin of ura­nium traces found on some of the machines and what kind of research and devel­op­ment is being conducted.

    The IAEA also has ques­tions about traces of highly enriched ura­nium found in a waste-storage facil­ity, and whether the Islamic repub­lic is using P2 cen­trifuges, which are capa­ble of enrich­ing ura­nium more rapidly than other centrifuges.

    The report also states that the IAEA is try­ing to obtain a 15-page report describ­ing Iran’s process of cast­ing and form­ing ura­nium metal into “hemi­spheres.” Experts say ura­nium metal must be cast into such shapes to form the core of a nuclear bomb.

    The IAEA ini­tially was allowed to review the doc­u­ment and take notes, accord­ing to the report. How­ever, after a mid-August visit Iran­ian offi­cials told inspec­tors they would not be able to ana­lyze the report and destroyed the notes they had taken. The doc­u­ment remains under seal in Iran, the report states.
    (Watch how Iran is show­ing its defi­ance — 2:58)
    http://www.cnn.com/video/partners/clickability/index.html?url=/video/world/2006/08/30/raman.iran.why.defy.cnn

    Bolton said this alone was evi­dence that Iran was pur­su­ing nuclear weaponry.

    Apart from few very sophis­ti­cated uses for ura­nium metal by the most advanced nuclear pro­grams in the world, the only real use for ura­nium metal is a nuclear weapon,” he said.

    Ear­lier in the day, Iran­ian Pres­i­dent Mah­moud Ahmadine­jad deliv­ered a speech, vow­ing not to give in to West­ern interests.

    They should know that the Iran­ian nation will not yield to pres­sure and will not let its rights be tram­pled on,” he said.

    High-level offi­cials — includ­ing top Iran­ian nuclear nego­tia­tor Ari Lar­i­jani and EU for­eign pol­icy chief Javier Solana — will meet in the com­ing days, Bolton said. The lan­guage of the sanc­tions res­o­lu­tion will be dis­cussed there­after, Bolton said.

    China and Rus­sia — both veto-wielding mem­bers of the Secu­rity Coun­cil — have been reluc­tant to sanc­tion Iran.

    The pass­ing of the dead­line “does not mean that nego­ti­a­tions and talks are dead,” said China’s U.N. ambas­sador Wang Guangya. “I do hope that even after the pass­ing of the dead­line that we should talk to each other to find a way out.”

    Iran appeared unfazed by the threats.

    Sanc­tions “can­not dis­suade Ira­ni­ans from their deci­sion to make progress,” Ahmadine­jad said, accord­ing to Iran’s state-run news agency. “On the con­trary, many of our suc­cesses, includ­ing access to the nuclear fuel cycle and pro­duc­ing of heavy water, have been achieved under sanctions.”

    Iran has been under IAEA inves­ti­ga­tion since 2003. Inspec­tors have turned up evi­dence of clan­des­tine plu­to­nium exper­i­ments, black-market cen­trifuge pur­chases and mil­i­tary links to what Iran says is a civil­ian nuclear pro­gram, accord­ing to the agency.

  11. Michael says:

    It’s much the same crap as was invented in the case of Iraq, I don’t think the world will fall for this scam again, cer­tainly Rus­sia and China will veto any attempt at sanc­tions and an Amer­i­can one would be irrel­e­vant.
    Even “Amer­i­can intel­li­gence” (if there is such a thing) con­firmed that Iran is at least 5 years away, and pos­si­bly 10, from pro­duc­ing a nuclear weapon EVEN IF they started today.

  12. Jon says:

    It’s much the same crap as was invented in the case of Iraq”

    Really? The IAEA would tend to dis­agree with you on that it seems.

    I don’t think the world will fall for this scam again”

    Doc­u­men­ta­tion on the Iran­ian process of cre­at­ing enriched ura­nium spher­oids is pretty damn­ing evi­dence. There is no peace­ful pur­pose for them.

    cer­tainly Rus­sia and China will veto any attempt at sanc­tions and an Amer­i­can one would be irrelevant”

    Cer­tainly Rus­sia and China have as big an inter­est in enforc­ing the NPT on Iran as the US does.

    Unless it is con­firmed that they are hid­ing P2 cen­trifuges which as the traces of highly enriched ura­nium indi­cate they are.

    This isn’t a US intel­li­gence report. This is an IAEA report. Iran has an oblig­a­tion to make all its nuclear facil­i­ties avail­able to inspec­tion by the IAEA and that does not appear to be the case as we all can see.

  13. Michael says:

    Really? The IAEA would tend to dis­agree with you on that it seems.

    Have the IAEA found any evi­dence that Iran is pro­duc­ing nuclear weapons? Nope of course they haven’t , indeed if the USA hadn’t got involved Iran would con­tinue to allow IAEA inspections.

    Doc­u­men­ta­tion on the Iran­ian process of cre­at­ing enriched ura­nium spher­oids is pretty damn­ing evi­dence. There is no peace­ful pur­pose for them.

    Yes and yel­low cake from Niger no doubt :) . There’s no evi­dence at all that either Iran is pro­duc­ing nuclear weapons, that they want to pro­duce nuclear weapons or even that they have the capa­bil­ity of pro­duc­ing nuclear weapons.

    Cer­tainly Rus­sia and China have as big an inter­est in enforc­ing the NPT on Iran as the US does.

    Well we will soon see who is right, there’s no way either will vote for sanc­tions on Iran.

    This isn’t a US intel­li­gence report. This is an IAEA report. Iran has an oblig­a­tion to make all its nuclear facil­i­ties avail­able to inspec­tion by the IAEA and that does not appear to be the case as we all can see.

    The one I ref­ered to was an Amer­i­can Intel­li­gence report from just about a year ago, 5 to 10 years they said, so what has changed? Iran allowed IAEA inspec­tions until the USA started dic­tat­ing the terms.

  14. Jon says:

    Have the IAEA found any evi­dence that Iran is pro­duc­ing nuclear weapons?”

    Didn’t you read the freak­ing arti­cle and watch the freak­ing videos? YES! Sheesh.

    indeed if the USA hadn’t got involved Iran would con­tinue to allow IAEA inspections”

    They aren’t vol­un­tary inspec­tions. Even the entirety of the US nuclear pro­gram is open to inspections.

    There’s no evi­dence at all that either Iran is pro­duc­ing nuclear weapons, that they want to pro­duce nuclear weapons or even that they have the capa­bil­ity of pro­duc­ing nuclear weapons”

    I’m glad you aren’t a mem­ber of the IAEA.

    Well we will soon see who is right, there’s no way either will vote for sanc­tions on Iran.”

    Yeah. We’ll see.

    The one I ref­ered to was an Amer­i­can Intel­li­gence report from just about a year ago, 5 to 10 years they said, so what has changed? Iran allowed IAEA inspec­tions until the USA started dic­tat­ing the terms.”

    This has what to do with the arti­cle I posted about the IAEA report on find­ings in Iran? Nothing.

  15. american hater says:

    y are amer­i­cans so mean???? why are the so self­ish?? how­come amer­i­can can do any­thing it wants?? destroy other coun­tries and decide whether iran can have a nuclear power or not?? who or what is amer­ica??? amer­ica didn’t even exist 600 years ago. Why are amer­i­cans always think­ing they are the best in every­thing???.. if amer­ica was so orga­nized and great and peace­ful, why do other coun­tries hate amer­ica???.. why ddoesnt amer­ica fix itz own prob­lems with kat­rina and the 700 mil­lion pris­on­ers in the coun­try and itz other shitty prob­lems!! fuk u amer­ica LEAVE THIS WORLD ALONE.