<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who would win the debate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2006/08/31/who-would-win-the-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2006/08/31/who-would-win-the-debate/</link>
	<description>Yet another Iraqi Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:33:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DAILY WAR NEWS FOR THURSDAY, August 31, 2006 :: from www.uruknet.info :: news from occupied Iraq - it</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2006/08/31/who-would-win-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-41059</link>
		<dc:creator>DAILY WAR NEWS FOR THURSDAY, August 31, 2006 :: from www.uruknet.info :: news from occupied Iraq - it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 22:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2006/08/31/who-would-win-the-debate/#comment-41059</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%--><a href="http://www.uruknet.info?p=26293:" rel="nofollow">http://www.uruknet.info?p=26293:</a>:  The incoming address of this article is :     dailywarnews.blogspot.com/::  The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Uruknet .         COMMENTS BY REGISTERED READERS OF URUKNET  The underneath postings are under the only responsability of the authors, and not necessarily we agree with them. If someone feels that any comment contains pornographic or racist expressions, or contents contrary to the law, let us know and — if our legal office confirms — it will removed asap. […]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2006/08/31/who-would-win-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-40677</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2006/08/31/who-would-win-the-debate/#comment-40677</guid>
		<description>&quot;If Iran ignores the deadline, sanctions by the UN Security Council are likely to be swift and ‘certainly will have an impact on the country,’ US State Department spokesman Tom Casey warned. &quot;

&lt;strong&gt;Don&#039;t these people know anything? Russia and China will not allow sanctions against Iran.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“If Iran ignores the deadline, sanctions by the UN Security Council are likely to be swift and ‘certainly will have an impact on the country,’ US State Department spokesman Tom Casey warned. ”</p>
<p><strong>Don’t these people know anything? Russia and China will not allow sanctions against Iran.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2006/08/31/who-would-win-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-40665</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2006/08/31/who-would-win-the-debate/#comment-40665</guid>
		<description>US: Iran leader&#039;s call for Bush debate a diversion

The United States on Tuesday urged Iran&#039;s president to rethink his rejection of an August 31 UN deadline to halt uranium enrichment, and dismissed his call for a TV debate with President George W Bush. 

If Iran ignores the deadline, sanctions by the UN Security Council are likely to be swift and &#039;certainly will have an impact on the country,&#039; US State Department spokesman Tom Casey warned. 

The Security Council last month gave Iran until Thursday to suspend uranium enrichment and other disputed nuclear activities or face possible sanctions. 

&#039;There&#039;s still time for them to do it,&#039; Casey said. 

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad earlier Thursday flatly rebuffed the UN deadline, telling a news conference in Tehran that his country would not bow to &#039;threats and ultimatums.&#039; 

He also challenged Bush to a televised debate &#039;about world developments,&#039; a proposal ridiculed by the State Department. 

&#039;I think this is a distraction,&#039; Casey told reporters. 

&#039;And I also think it&#039;s somewhat odd for the president of a country that represses all debate within its own society to be talking about free and open exchange of ideas.&#039; 

The UN deadline is backed by Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States - the five veto-holding council members - plus Germany. The six powers have offered Iran a package of incentives if it stops uranium enrichment. 

It is the council&#039;s toughest action yet to keep Iran from building any nuclear weapons - an aim the Iran denies, saying its programme is purely for the civilian purpose of generating electricity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US: Iran leader’s call for Bush debate a diversion</p>
<p>The United States on Tuesday urged Iran’s president to rethink his rejection of an August 31 UN deadline to halt uranium enrichment, and dismissed his call for a TV debate with President George W Bush. </p>
<p>If Iran ignores the deadline, sanctions by the UN Security Council are likely to be swift and ‘certainly will have an impact on the country,’ US State Department spokesman Tom Casey warned. </p>
<p>The Security Council last month gave Iran until Thursday to suspend uranium enrichment and other disputed nuclear activities or face possible sanctions. </p>
<p>‘There’s still time for them to do it,’ Casey said. </p>
<p>Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad earlier Thursday flatly rebuffed the UN deadline, telling a news conference in Tehran that his country would not bow to ‘threats and ultimatums.’ </p>
<p>He also challenged Bush to a televised debate ‘about world developments,’ a proposal ridiculed by the State Department. </p>
<p>‘I think this is a distraction,’ Casey told reporters. </p>
<p>‘And I also think it’s somewhat odd for the president of a country that represses all debate within its own society to be talking about free and open exchange of ideas.’ </p>
<p>The UN deadline is backed by Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States — the five veto-holding council members — plus Germany. The six powers have offered Iran a package of incentives if it stops uranium enrichment. </p>
<p>It is the council’s toughest action yet to keep Iran from building any nuclear weapons — an aim the Iran denies, saying its programme is purely for the civilian purpose of generating electricity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2006/08/31/who-would-win-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-40651</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2006/08/31/who-would-win-the-debate/#comment-40651</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;We would need a translation for Bush or at least someone capable of explaining what he actually means. :)&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We would need a translation for Bush or at least someone capable of explaining what he actually means. :)</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
