<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big Battle of Baghdad #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:20:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAILY WAR NEWS FOR THURSDAY, January 18, 2007 :: from www.uruknet.info :: news from occupied Iraq - it</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65062</link>
		<dc:creator>DAILY WAR NEWS FOR THURSDAY, January 18, 2007 :: from www.uruknet.info :: news from occupied Iraq - it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/#comment-65062</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%--><a href="http://www.uruknet.info?p=29860:" rel="nofollow">http://www.uruknet.info?p=29860:</a>:  The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Uruknet .         COMMENTS BY REGISTERED READERS OF URUKNET  The COMMENTs of our readers are the sole responsability of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of URUKNET. If you believe that any COMMENT contains pornographic, racist or otherwise objectionable or offensive content, or if the COMMENT is contrary to law in any way, please let us know. Our legal representatives will review any and all complaints and, if any complaint is deemed to be accurate, the COMMENT will removed at once. […]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAILY WAR NEWS FOR THURSDAY, January 18, 2007 &#124; Outlaw News</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65038</link>
		<dc:creator>DAILY WAR NEWS FOR THURSDAY, January 18, 2007 &#124; Outlaw News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/#comment-65038</guid>
		<description>[...] Among these instructions there are confidential points, would prefer not to be published, but that the most important thing was (police forces, the Iraqi army and and any other government forces), are legitimate targets, to be targeted without reference or orders from the Iraqi resistance high commands&#8230;..  According the instructions on other points, how to deal with the attackers, prisoners, their families, and how to deal with the missiles&#8230;&#8230;  It seems that the Americans are managing the armed Sunni-Shiite conflict for much bigger reasons and I bet an Arab-Iran military confrontation is one of them, to explode the entire region, with the presence of other dossiers Lebanon and Palestine.  Certainly, inflame Shiite-Sunni conflict is not in the interest of the Arabs, it works for the benefit of the United States and Israel.  But, it is too late for this moral and political preaching!  read in full&#8230;  Roads to Iraq: ARAB LEADERS &#8220;SCEPTICAL&#8221; OR &#8220;WELCOMED&#8221; NEW U.S. STRATEGY IN IRAQ? This is how world news reported   Arab leaders &#8216;deeply sceptical&#8217; of Iraq plan.&#8230;..January 17, 2007 The ministers, from six Gulf states plus Egypt and Jordan, showed particular concerns about whether the Shiite-led government of Nouri Maliki can reach out to Iraq&#8217;s Sunni Arab minority to end their resistance and lure them to the political process, said Arab diplomats. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Among these instructions there are confidential points, would prefer not to be published, but that the most important thing was (police forces, the Iraqi army and and any other government forces), are legitimate targets, to be targeted without reference or orders from the Iraqi resistance high commands…..  According the instructions on other points, how to deal with the attackers, prisoners, their families, and how to deal with the missiles……  It seems that the Americans are managing the armed Sunni-Shiite conflict for much bigger reasons and I bet an Arab-Iran military confrontation is one of them, to explode the entire region, with the presence of other dossiers Lebanon and Palestine.  Certainly, inflame Shiite-Sunni conflict is not in the interest of the Arabs, it works for the benefit of the United States and Israel.  But, it is too late for this moral and political preaching!  read in full…  Roads to Iraq: ARAB LEADERS “SCEPTICAL” OR “WELCOMED” NEW U.S. STRATEGY IN IRAQ? This is how world news reported   Arab leaders ‘deeply sceptical’ of Iraq plan.…..January 17, 2007 The ministers, from six Gulf states plus Egypt and Jordan, showed particular concerns about whether the Shiite-led government of Nouri Maliki can reach out to Iraq’s Sunni Arab minority to end their resistance and lure them to the political process, said Arab diplomats. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seyyid Mohammad al Amriki</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65028</link>
		<dc:creator>Seyyid Mohammad al Amriki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/#comment-65028</guid>
		<description>&quot;1- during the siege of Falluja, the Sadr movt (was not a full fledged army then) gave support to the resistance fighters.&quot;
-Layla

I wasn&#039;t aware of that. I remember as far back as from the Tel Afar operation (which was same time to Fallujah) that Muqtada was sending his boys into the America-trained army to fight against Ahlus Sunnah, and in the case of Tel Afar, particularily against the Kurdi Ba&#039;athists.

www.al-faloja.com/vb/showthread.php?t=3092
(for video)

Also the article said Iran is helping Al Qa&#039;eda, I highly doubt that. Since the time of stability in Afghanistan (i.e. Talibani era) Iran was funding the opposition to Al Qa&#039;eda and Taliban and even during the war they supported the Americans and have since arrested a number of (alleged) Al Qaeda opps in Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“1– during the siege of Falluja, the Sadr movt (was not a full fledged army then) gave support to the resistance fighters.“<br />
–Layla</p>
<p>I wasn’t aware of that. I remember as far back as from the Tel Afar operation (which was same time to Fallujah) that Muqtada was sending his boys into the America-trained army to fight against Ahlus Sunnah, and in the case of Tel Afar, particularily against the Kurdi Ba’athists.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.al-faloja.com/vb/showthread.php?t=3092" rel="nofollow">http://www.al-faloja.com/vb/showthread.php?t=3092</a><br />
(for video)</p>
<p>Also the article said Iran is helping Al Qa’eda, I highly doubt that. Since the time of stability in Afghanistan (i.e. Talibani era) Iran was funding the opposition to Al Qa’eda and Taliban and even during the war they supported the Americans and have since arrested a number of (alleged) Al Qaeda opps in Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Layla Anwar</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65015</link>
		<dc:creator>Layla Anwar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/#comment-65015</guid>
		<description>There are many false points in the linked article provided by Keld Bach.
1- during the siege of Falluja, the Sadr movt (was not a full fledged army then) gave support to the resistance fighters.
2- After the falluja period, the Sadr movt which was then considered a patriotic anti occupation movt, was bought and absorbed by Iran and convinced to join the Badr,Maghawir and other sub groups of shi&#039;a militants.
3-Iran is not providing arms or funding to  iraqi resistance fighters . Al Qaeda and Ansar al Islam are a VERY Tiny group of the Resistance. The main bulk of the resistance is made of nationalists and patriots , some are baathists and some are not. They are clearly aware of the iranian danger lurking. 
I think the above article is twisting facts for political purposes by lumping them all together and I would use a discerning eye before making a final judgement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many false points in the linked article provided by Keld Bach.<br />
1– during the siege of Falluja, the Sadr movt (was not a full fledged army then) gave support to the resistance fighters.<br />
2– After the falluja period, the Sadr movt which was then considered a patriotic anti occupation movt, was bought and absorbed by Iran and convinced to join the Badr,Maghawir and other sub groups of shi’a militants.<br />
3-Iran is not providing arms or funding to  iraqi resistance fighters . Al Qaeda and Ansar al Islam are a VERY Tiny group of the Resistance. The main bulk of the resistance is made of nationalists and patriots , some are baathists and some are not. They are clearly aware of the iranian danger lurking.<br />
I think the above article is twisting facts for political purposes by lumping them all together and I would use a discerning eye before making a final judgement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keld Bach</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65001</link>
		<dc:creator>Keld Bach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/#comment-65001</guid>
		<description>Iran&#039;s Secret Plan For Mayhem: Iran is supporting both Sunni and Shiite terrorists in the Iraqi civil war, according to secret Iranian documents captured by Americans in Iraq. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nysun.com/article/46032?page_no=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iran’s Secret Plan For Mayhem: Iran is supporting both Sunni and Shiite terrorists in the Iraqi civil war, according to secret Iranian documents captured by Americans in Iraq. <a href="http://www.nysun.com/article/46032?page_no=1" rel="nofollow">link</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Big Battle of Baghdad #2 :: from www.uruknet.info :: news from occupied Iraq - it</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65000</link>
		<dc:creator>The Big Battle of Baghdad #2 :: from www.uruknet.info :: news from occupied Iraq - it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/#comment-65000</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Roads to Iraq [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[…] Roads to Iraq […]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iraq Solidarity News (Al-Thawra)</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65159</link>
		<dc:creator>Iraq Solidarity News (Al-Thawra)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/#comment-65159</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; The Big Battle of Baghdad #2 Roads to Iraq  [IMG] The events reported on &quot;Haifa Street&quot; just because the neighborhood was a total embarrassment for the &quot;Green Zone&quot; government and the occupation forces, actually if you stand in the street you can see the entrance of the &quot;Green Zone&quot;, but what&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> The Big Battle of Baghdad #2 Roads to Iraq  [IMG] The events reported on “Haifa Street” just because the neighborhood was a total embarrassment for the “Green Zone” government and the occupation forces, actually if you stand in the street you can see the entrance of the “Green Zone”, but what<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Today in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65256</link>
		<dc:creator>Today in Iraq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/01/17/the-big-battle-of-baghdad-2/#comment-65256</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;the presence of other dossiers Lebanon and Palestine.  Certainly, inflame Shiite-Sunni conflict is not in the interest of the Arabs, it works for the benefit of the United States and Israel.  But, it is too late for this moral and political preaching!  read in full...  Roads to Iraq: ARAB LEADERS &quot;SCEPTICAL&quot; OR &quot;WELCOMED&quot; NEW U.S. STRATEGY IN IRAQ?  This is how world news reported  Arab leaders &#039;deeply sceptical&#039; of Iraq plan......January 17, 2007  The ministers, from six Gulf states plus Egypt and Jordan, showed&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->the presence of other dossiers Lebanon and Palestine.  Certainly, inflame Shiite-Sunni conflict is not in the interest of the Arabs, it works for the benefit of the United States and Israel.  But, it is too late for this moral and political preaching!  read in full…  Roads to Iraq: ARAB LEADERS “SCEPTICAL” OR “WELCOMED” NEW U.S. STRATEGY IN IRAQ?  This is how world news reported  Arab leaders ‘deeply sceptical’ of Iraq plan.…..January 17, 2007  The ministers, from six Gulf states plus Egypt and Jordan, showed<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

