The so called “unity accord” is to renew a 41 years old failed alliance to divide Iraq

Some Amer­i­can Blog­gers reported the so called “unity accord” a “Good news”, and blam­ing their own media for not report­ing it.

Here we will see why the Sun­nis are not impressed by the new so called “the new alliance”.

This alliance, which was announced in Bagh­dad, is to renew a 41 years old alliance between the two fac­tions was signed in 1966, in north­ern Iraq. [notice the sim­i­lar­ity in events and char­ac­ters]

The char­ac­ters

The old ver­sion was signed by the late Sayed Mahdi Al-Hakim, [the elder son of the Shi­ites Mr. Mohsen Hakim’s father Abdel Aziz al-Hakim] and Moham­mad Karim Al Kurdi, [who rep­re­sented Mul­lah Mustafa Barzani, father of Mas­soud Barzani], a his­toric alliance blessed by the Shah of Iran and Israeli intel­li­gence that year.

The aim

Aimed to end decades of Arabs, Sunni dom­i­na­tion of power in Iraq [Al-hakim fam­ily never con­sid­ered them­selves as Iraqis, they are Ira­ni­ans and their loy­alty always to Iran], and to divide Iraq into three sep­a­rated regions.

Back­ground

British planes bom­barded the Kurds head­quar­ters in Sulay­maniyah, who cho­sen a king, Sheikh Mah­moud for their few-days-lived King­dom of Kur­dis­tan, the British inter­ests did not allow the estab­lish­ment of a Kur­dish state in north­ern Iraq, intro­duced the Kur­dish provinces under the Iraqi state, which was a man­date under the British rule.

Kur­dish and Shi­ite par­ties needed to grab power in Iraq from the Sunni Arabs, and then to estab­lish a dia­logue with those will­ing _ as indi­vid­u­als _ to join the Alliance or to be a part of it [but not influ­en­tial].

In the agree­ment, Iraqi wealth has to be divided between the three fac­tions: One third to go to the Kurds, another third to the Shi­ites and another third will be put as com­mon inter­ests, pub­lic util­i­ties and to cover the Sunni quota.

Divid­ing the Iraqi army into six bat­tal­ions, two under the Shi­ites lead­ers, two for the Kurds lead­ers and two for the other minori­ties, includ­ing Sun­nis, Army com­mand will be a joint among Kurds and Shiite.

This plan has been blessed by the Shah of Iran who found a way to dis­mem­ber Iraq and end any pos­si­ble dan­ger comes against Iran’s inter­ests, were he used Israeli advis­ers and experts to imple­ment this scheme.

Al-Hakim saw that the Ira­ni­ans sup­port for the Kur­dish rebels could give the Kurds a larger share of than the third, he met with Shah of Iran and lead­ers of the Iran­ian SAVAK intel­li­gence, such as Gen­eral Man­sour and Colonel Ali Akbar Fraz­ian and warned them from Mustafa Al-Barzani and insist­ing that they need to develop a pol­icy that moves Barzani and the Kur­dish lead­er­ship under the Shi­ite umbrella, to pre­vent any sup­port or assis­tance to Kurds only if sign-approved by Hakim, his chil­dren and his senior representatives.

The Shah of Iran and SAVAK agreed to this plan, and when Barazani asked Iran for arms and weapons to stage a coup in Bagh­dad, Tehran answers that he must ask Al-Hakim approval first. Barazani knew the change in the Iran­ian posi­tion, he secretly sent a mes­sage to Sad­dam and al-Bakr telling what had hap­pened in details and sub­mits infor­ma­tion about meet­ings in Tehran and his will­ing­ness to coop­er­ate with them rather than coop­er­ate with the Shah of Iran and the Israeli intel­li­gence service.

The Iraqi gov­ern­ments announced the dis­cov­ery of an Iran­ian con­spir­acy and exe­cuted a group of Iraqi offi­cers who con­tacted the Ira­ni­ans, then an agree­ment announced among Iraqi gov­ern­ment and the Kur­dish lead­er­ship [in March].

The Shi­ites and the Shah of Iran decided to get their revenge and destroy the Kur­dish rebel, Mul­lah Mustafa A-Barazani became a refugee in the United States.

Con­clu­sion

This alliance is to the ben­e­fit of Israel and the neo-conservatives in Wash­ing­ton who care about the secu­rity of Israel rather than the secu­rity of the United States itself and to achieve the fol­low­ing objectives:

First: To dis­tance the Arab coun­tries [Saudi Ara­bia, Egypt, Jor­dan, Syria and the Gulf states] from any influ­ence or inter­fer­ence in the Iraqi arena to keep the yard open to Israel and the West­ern Powers.

Sec­ond: the mar­gin­al­iza­tion of the roles Turkey and Iran in Kur­dis­tan and the pro­tec­tion of the Kurds of Turkey and Iran, also give Barzani and Tal­a­bani oppor­tu­nity to sell them­selves as national heroes to the Kur­dish community.

Third: end­ing the pan-Arabism in Iraq and the role of the Sun­nis locally, and the con­ver­sion of the Arabs and Sun­nis in Iraq to refugees in their own coun­try or to neigh­bor­ing countries.

Fourth: Cre­at­ing bases for Israel and west­ern pow­ers in the Gulf and the Indian Ocean and to enable Israel allied with the neo-conservatives to dom­i­nate the new Mid­dle East which will include Iran and Turkey in addi­tion to the Arab League.