Ba’ath party 13th conference: New resistance alliance front and statement about dividing Iraq

20 Responses to Ba’ath party 13th conference: New resistance alliance front and statement about dividing Iraq

1. Zaidan says:

   October 5, 2007 at 00:59

   To cor­rect this course, the Demo­c­ra­tic pres­i­dent will say, we must reverse all his actions at the foun­da­tions. Why must Amer­i­can lives be sac­ri­ficed for a coun­try that itself at its heart is dis­jointed. The Democ­rats will point to the Kurds as the epit­ome of a nation that has seceeded.

   And that, unfor­tu­nately, is how the logic will go.

   The US pub­lic is already being read­ied for par­ti­tion. But not that par­ti­tion will bother any of the US vot­ers. As a mat­ter of fact, they couldn’t care less.

   There­fore, it has always struck us as odd that US media reports the plan for Iraq is faltering.

   How could it fal­ter if all the ele­ments were put in place in 1990 to lead to the par­ti­tion of the country?

   The plan in Iraq IS work­ing. Mil­i­tar­ily it has been defeated. Polit­i­cally it is an unbri­dled success.

   The plan was, is and always will be to destroy Iraq. No elec­tions. No democ­racy. Not even social order. Sim­ply division. http://futureiraq.blogspot.com/2007/10/plan-for-iraq-is-was-partition.html

2. Pingback: Roads to Iraq » Blog Archive » Propaganda: Syria and Iraqi resistance

3. Alison says:

   October 16, 2007 at 13:13

   It is worth draw­ing atten­tion to Salah Al-Mukhtar’s arti­cle on ‘THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE JIHAD AND LIBERATION DECLARATION’ : http://al-moharer.net/mohhtm/mukhtar262en.htm

   For those not famil­iar with Salah Al-Mukhtar, he is a for­mer Iraqi Ambas­sador to India and Viet­nam, a lead­ing Ba’athist thinker and an inde­fati­ga­ble Resis­tance activist, who was involved in the prepa­ra­tion of the Iraqi National Resis­tance prior to the inva­sion under the guid­ance of Mar­tyr Pres­i­dent Sad­dam Hussein.
4. LadyBird says:

   October 16, 2007 at 20:07

   Thank for the Eng­lish link Ali­son, I read it in Ara­bic two weeks ago
5. NEWSDESK HELSINKI FINLAND says:

   October 16, 2007 at 21:09

   On Jihad & Lib­er­a­tion and Allawi:

   We’ve been doing some check­ing and it cer­tainly looks like Allawi and al-Douri (& Baath) are work­ing together these days:

   http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gFa5HSY2EdxHT25-60FFZT3XPbEQD8S247080 for Allawi him­self boast­ing with such nego­ti­a­tions, the rel­e­vant part saying:

   Ayad Allawi, Iraq’s first post-Saddam prime min­is­ter, has recently said he held talks with mem­bers of the Baath party loyal to al-Douri, for which he was severely crit­i­cized by Iraq’s cur­rent prime min­is­ter, Nouri al-Maliki.

   http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IJ17Ak03.html for Esco­bar, always very naïve relates how “Iraqi Resis­tance” is gathering:

   “com­pris­ing not only Sun­nis but also Shi’ites”, to which he says, belong “the Sadrists, the (Shi’ite) Fad­hila party, all Sunni par­ties, the par­ti­sans of for­mer interim prime min­is­ter Iyad Allawi, and the par­ti­sans of for­mer prime min­is­ter Ibrahim al-Jaafari (…) Iraqi national pact is in the mak­ing — coor­di­nated by VicePres­i­dent Tariq al-Hashimi, a Sunni, and blessed by Grand Aya­tol­lah Ali al-Sistani him­self (…) Ammar al-Hakim even went to Ramadi on Sun­day to talk to Sheikh Ahmed Abu Risha, brother of the late Abdul Sat­tar Abu Risha, the for­mer leader of the tribal coali­tion Anbar Awak­en­ing Coun­cil who was killed by a bomb last month. It was the first time since the inva­sion and occu­pa­tion that a SIIC leader went to hard­core Sunni Anbar province. Ammar al-Hakim glow­ingly described the dead sheikh as “a national hero” (…) Ammar al-Hakim was flanked by none other than feared Hadi al-Amri, the leader of the Badr Brigades — the SIIC mili­tia trained by Iran’s Rev­o­lu­tion­ary Guards, that in fact com­prises the bulk of death squads involved in the avalanche of sec­tar­ian killings (…) And there’s still more — the coor­di­nated, “new Ba’ath” front: 22 resis­tance groups, under the com­mand of for­mer Sad­dam star Izaat al-Douri, already seri­ously talk­ing with the Iyad Allawi bloc — thus part of the nation­al­ist front — and dic­tat­ing their con­di­tions, which include a resis­tance cease­fire in exchange for a pre­cise US timetable for withdrawal.

   Never mind­ing the mess Esco­bar — cer­tainly badly informed is mak­ing — the point is that the plot appears to be exactly as we warned pre­vi­ously in the arti­cle IRAQ: Al-Qaida a.k.a. the “Islamic” Fed­er­a­tion of Iraq (http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/2007/10/iraq-al-qaida.html).

   So, there you have it: exactly the same par­ties and per­son­al­i­ties that always worked with the U.S., SCIRI (& Badr), Sadr (Mahdi Mili­tia), Allawi, Jafari, Hashimi, and so on now work­ing with the “gen­uine” and “legit­i­mate” Baath party.

   So its right back to the square zero when the so-called “polit­i­cal process” begun except that now the Baath c/o Jor­dan is pro­vid­ing HQ for the Sunni mili­tia for the inter­nal Sunni civil war against the Iraqi Armed Resistance.

   We’ll con­firm this soon, of course, but it is already looking

   Great. Just Great.
6. Alison says:

   October 17, 2007 at 10:00

   To NDHF: I have given up try­ing to get through to you. If you don’t want to email Salah Al-Mukhtar, whose cre­den­tials as a Resis­tance activist are UNIMPEACHABLE, why not address your ques­tions to the edi­tors of Al-Moharer.net and Albasrah.net?

   Oth­er­wise, please avoid writ­ing about mat­ters of which you are totally ignorant.

   For the authors of a sup­pos­edly pro-resistance blog to per­sist in spread­ing dis­for­ma­tion about the Arab Ba’ath Social­ist Party (Iraq Lead­er­ship), which spear­headed and nur­tured the Iraqi National Resis­tance under the guid­ance of Mar­tyr Pres­i­dent Sad­dam Hus­sein, is totally unacceptable.

   In doing so, you have not only crossed a RED LINE. In your gulli­bil­ity and obdu­racy, you have also fallen into a TRAP set by the occu­piers and their agents to SOW MISTRUST between Resis­tance fac­tions that ought to be work­ing together. You are also mak­ing fools of yourselves.
7. NEWSDESK HELSINKI FINLAND says:

   October 19, 2007 at 14:05

   Our analy­sis is now nearly com­plete. We need only some edi­to­r­ial advice from Iraq so to okay its pub­li­ca­tion so that you can expect us to come out with the full-weight deliv­ery some­where next week should we get an autho­riza­tion for its pub­li­ca­tion. Till then, ta ta..
8. Eva says:

   October 19, 2007 at 19:05

   News­desk Helsinki Finland,

   You are nei­ther an Iraqi Resis­tance sup­porter nor a hon­est journalist.

   I’d bet any­thing that you are a mem­ber of the noto­ri­ous counter-insurgency Pro­pa­ganda front called Al-Fajr Media Center.

   They have a rep­u­ta­tion for fool­ing around pro-Iraqi web­sites and blogs and sow­ing the seeds of doubt about the legit­i­mate lead­er­ship of the Resis­tance (BA’ATH) just the way you do.
9. bARABie says:

   October 20, 2007 at 08:22

   Ali­son bravo. You are on the ball unlike our dear friend at the “news desk”. Al Duri work­ing with allawi???? haha­ha­haha My ass he is. Al Duri has the same prinici­ples as the mar­tyr Sad­dam Hus­sein, which means he will NEVER work with the trai­tors who raped, pil­laged and mur­dered his coun­try. News­desk, i think you have either been had or you are try­ing to stir the pot, so to speak.
10. Alison says:

    October 22, 2007 at 13:29

    The ugly smear cam­paign against the Jihad & Lib­er­a­tion Front orig­i­nat­ing in the rene­gade wing of the Ba’ath Party (led by M. You­nis Al-Ahmed), in which the self-proclaimed AMSI par­ti­sans at NDHF glee­fully par­tic­i­pated, has made me very wary. Surely all groups gen­uinely opposed to the occu­pa­tion of Iraq ought to be work­ing together, not smear­ing each other?

    For the ben­e­fit of those who are inter­ested in the truth and who care about the lib­er­a­tion of Iraq, here is a link to an arti­cle based on recent inter­views with Abu Mohammed, the polit­i­cal spokesman of Izzat Ibrahim Al-Douri, the Sec­re­tary Gen­eral of the Arab Ba’ath Social­ist Party (Iraq Branch), who also heads the Supreme Com­mand of the Jihad & Lib­er­a­tion Front: http://www.workers.org/2007/world/iraq-1025/
11. NEWSDESK HELSINKI FINLAND says:

    October 22, 2007 at 19:03

    @ Ali­son, on “self-proclaimed AMSI par­ti­sans at NDHF”

    We never dis­close any of our email to any out­side party, but in response to this unin­formed pro­pa­ganda here are some selected quotes from our cor­re­spon­dence with Jaama’at e-Ulema e-Islami (cho­sen so that not­ing more than their eval­u­a­tion of the NEWSDESK HELSINKI FINLAND efforts are revealed, bold added by us):

    1. AMSI on 18.9.2007:

    Alaiku­mus salam

    Peace be upon you and your team.

    First of all, we want to send our incon­veince for not send­ing ear­lier responses to you.

    Indeed before eval­u­at­ing your e-mail we want to point out one impor­tant issue that is receiv­ing one of your e-mail has a great value for us to know such per­sons hav­ing honor and car­ry­ing the real mean­ing to being a human being.

    [… A dis­closed pas­sage deleted…]

    Before con­clud­ing our e-mail we send our best and warm good wishes to you and your team that is doing the best strug­gle on the cyber world!

    Take care

    AMSI (Press Depart­ment)
    ——

    2. AMSI on Oct. 15

    Alaiku­mus salam

    Dear Louhi,

    How nice to hear you again. It is inter­est­ing to try to define some words like love, pas­sion and so on. The word of love is the great­est emo­tion given by Allah (God) to the human­ity. As our basic belief we –mus­lims– name mus­lims as broth­ers in reli­gion and other peo­ple as broth­ers in human being. These cat­e­go­riza­tion is of course based on the divine thought…

    We love you — and oth­ers — for your atti­tude as well as your admirable efforts at the stage of this his­tory so as mak­ing and writ­ing the his­tory against mon­sters and oppressors.

    The Asso­ca­tion of Mus­lim Schol­ars in Iraq (AMSI), its admin­is­tra­tive boards, mem­bers, coun­cils, depart­ments and of course whole Iraqi nation (Mus­lim Ummah too) admire your great efforts, works which can be eval­u­ated “the great works that approach a human to the love of Allah and Par­adise”. Because we believe that a per­son have to pre­vent eppres­sion with his hand, his mouth, his tongue or a dis­tress of not accept­ing it accord­ing to Holy Prophet’s say­ing. You are exactly doing this hon­or­able job that is hard to present our appre­ci­ate words writ­ten at the dic­tio­nar­ies.

    We pray you to be with us in this world and here­after insaallah.

    Best regards…

    AMSI (Press Depart­ment), Xxxxx Yyyyyyyy
    ——

    Then some other related points:

    §1. Why do you think it is coin­ci­dence that with this sort of dear friends just in a cou­ple of days
    (a) our email box is hijacked http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/2007/10/off-topic-on-nfdh-email-box-these-days.html
    (b) our pic­ture post­ing capa­bil­i­ties cut off http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/2007/10/newsdesk-helsinki-finland-iraqi.html
    © our IP address blocked so that we could not reach­ing “Iraq news” and repost them
    http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/2007/10/google-search-for-iraq-news-disappears.html
    We do not think so, because as a mat­ter of fact we are proud to say, that we belong to the FINNISH RESISTANCE now fully and openly sid­ing with the ARMED IRAQI RESISTANCE, espe­cially as rep­re­sented by the Jihad and Reform Front, the Jihad and Change Front, the Shi’ite Resis­tance in the South­ern Iraq and its polit­i­cal arm and heal­ing hands, the Jama’at e-Ulema e-Islami, the ASSOCIATION of MUSLIM SCHOLARS in IRAQ.

    §2. What comes to your com­ment “Surely all groups gen­uinely opposed to the occu­pa­tion of Iraq ought to be work­ing together, not smear­ing each other?” we would most whole-heartedly agree, but the dif­fer­ence lies exactly in the ques­tion of who exactly is gen­uinely opposed to the occu­pa­tion: From what we have observed, the Baath “resis­tance” did noth­ing but put forth a “front” they didn’t even dare to call a front and went right after to nego­ti­ate with the U.S. demand­ing a NUTTY “con­di­tion” of the U.S. offi­cial announce­ment of with­drawal, as if any announce­ment of the U.S. enemy occu­pier was worth any­thing these days. (Our report con­cern­ing this, as well as the part of the Baath party in the most recent U.S. plot­tings is now com­plete, but we’ll hold it back for some time on, see­ing that our Mujahideen broth­ers are in no hurry with com­ing out with this either)
12. Alison says:

    October 24, 2007 at 09:44

    With friends like you, AMSI cer­tainly doesn’t need enemies!!

    How­ever, as far as evil-minded MOLES go, you’re a bit clumsy and ama­teur­ish. You’ve made your­selves a real laugh­ing stock on this blog! Looks like the CIA ought to can­cel your paycheck.

    Here’s a sug­ges­tion: As you’re strug­gling to get your twisted mes­sage across in Eng­lish, why not post any future com­ments in Finnish? I’m sure no one would object. Bet­ter still: Get lost!!
13. NEWSDESK HELSINKI FINLAND says:

    October 24, 2007 at 11:38

    @ Ali­son: Find­ing out about that is very easy: here’s their con­tact address so that you can con­firm that yourself:

    http://heyetnet.org/en/component/option,com_contact/Itemid,3/
14. NEWSDESK HELSINKI FINLAND says:

    October 25, 2007 at 10:04

    UPDATE: On the Rela­tions of NDHF and AMSI

    Just an hour ago we received an email from the AMSI Press Depart­ment, con­sist­ing of two parts, a com­plain con­cern­ing our ser­vices and the AMSI Press Depart­ment to that which we repro­duce here so to sort this issue out in a proper way:

    §1. The Complaint:

    I would like to alert you to the fact that News­desk Helsinki Fin­land (NDHF), based at http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/ is bring­ing AMSI’s name into dis­re­pute. NDFH edi­tors, who claim to be AMSI’s Finnish rep­re­sen­ta­tives, have started spread­ing mali­cious dis­in­for­ma­tion about other Resis­tance fac­tions in com­ments posted on var­i­ous pro-resistance blogs. Would you please con­firm as soon as pos­si­ble that NDHF is not autho­rised to speak for AMSI?

    §2. The AMSI Press Depart­ment response:

    Dear Sir/Madam,

    Thanks a lot for your kind e-mail about developments.

    Please note that we have no rep­re­sen­ta­tives in Fin­land or other Euro­pean Coun­try. If so it would be pub­lish at our web page like oth­ers in the world.

    On part of NDHF we are nei­ther respon­si­ble of their pol­icy nor have an offi­cial ties. They are a group who are try­ing to give reli­able and hid­den news about Iraq. The­fore they are mostly tak­ing news from AMSI which is impor­tant base for them.

    The issue of mali­cious dis­in­for­ma­tion about fac­tions and oth­ers is not known for us. We have not heard it before. Please also send your fears and com­ments to NDHF team includ­ing your sug­gest and infor­ma­tion. Because they are try­ing to spread trusted news which would be help­ful to the Iraqis. Their great efforts are to be appre­ci­ated in many ways as far as we know.

    We hope that as soon as they get any news, infor­ma­tion, com­plaint from you or any other per­son about their web page, they will con­tact to you and start to improve, develop and cor­rect their site accord­ing to the inspec­ta­tions, research and etc.

    We are look­ing for­ward to receive your e-mail about developments.

    Sin­cerely

    AMSI Press Department

    Note: Please send your other detail infor­ma­tion to be in con­tact with you. Thanks

    ——-
    §3. NDHF eds: What comes to the com­plain­ing email, DO NOTE THAT WE NOWHERE CLAIM TO BE REPRESENTATIVES OF AMSI. WHICH WE ARE NOT (oth­er­wise we’d indi­cate our mem­ber­ship in the very name and out­look of our blog, of course).

    Instead we claim (a direct quote from above with bold added):

    (a) we belong to the FINNISH RESISTANCE
    (b) now fully and openly sid­ing with the ARMED IRAQI RESISTANCE, espe­cially as rep­re­sented by the Jihad and Reform Front, the Jihad and Change Front, the Shi’ite Resis­tance in the South­ern Iraq and its polit­i­cal arm and heal­ing hands, the Jama’at e-Ulema e-Islami, the ASSOCIATION of MUSLIM SCHOLARS in IRAQ.

    Thank you,

    Ed. Louhi on the behalf of the NEWSDESK HELSINKI FINLAND
15. NEWSDESK HELSINKI FINLAND says:

    October 26, 2007 at 15:09

    On Baath nego­ti­a­tions: the hard core of the baathists’ nego­ti­a­tions with the U.S. sketched in this repost­ing of an AMSI arti­cle recently trans­lated into English:

    http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/2007/10/who-is-occupying-iraq-samir-obaid.html

    Should you know any­thing more, the com­ment sec­tion is open and always uncen­sored (we’ll keep hold­ing back our Baath report as long as the fate of the nego­ti­a­tion issue is open and the Mujahideen have ver­i­fied their posi­tion, but keep eye on this ;)
16. Alison says:

    October 27, 2007 at 11:06

    So NDHF edi­tors aren’t moles after all, just igno­rant, wrong­headed and overzeal­ous par­ti­sans of AMSI. The lat­ter has appar­ently not been mon­i­tor­ing NDHF edi­tors’ (mali­cious) activ­i­ties closely enough, as it seems to be obliv­i­ous of the dam­age they are doing to both to its own rep­u­ta­tion and – indi­rectly – to the Resis­tance as a whole.

    If NDHF edi­tors had con­tented them­selves with pro­vid­ing infor­ma­tion about AMSI and the armed fac­tions affil­i­ated with it, their efforts would be PRAISEWORTHY. How­ever, by set­ting them­selves up as an author­ity on the Iraqi Resis­tance as a whole, about which they know very lit­tle, and by impugn­ing the Arab Ba’ath Social­ist Party (Iraq Lead­er­ship) and the Jihad and Lib­er­a­tion Front, about which they know noth­ing, they have become a MENACE. In doing so, they are also fail­ing to meet min­i­mum jour­nal­is­tic and eth­i­cal stan­dards. They have also failed to respond to com­plaints and crit­i­cism in the man­ner that AMSI clearly expects of them.

    I there­fore call on other read­ers of this blog to email their com­plaints about NDHF edi­tors to AMSI Press Depart­ment (press@heyetnet.org) high­light­ing the poten­tially very dam­ag­ing reper­cus­sions of their irre­spon­si­ble and ill-informed, not to say down­right mali­cious, report­ing / comments.

    It would also be worth enquir­ing of AMSI where it stands with regard to the CONSPIRACY led by ex-Ba’athist usurper Mohammed You­nis Al_Ahmed, and how it is respond­ing to the urgent appeal for unity and sol­i­dar­ity between ALL Iraqi Resis­tance fac­tions, nation­al­ist and Islamist, issued by the Arab Ba’ath Social­ist Party (Iraq Lead­er­ship, i.e Al-Douri and col­leagues) in the fol­low­ing state­ment dated 28 Sep­tem­ber 2007: http://www.al-moharer.net/qiwa_shabiya/baath28-9-07e.htm

    I quote: “With the US con­gress’ insist­ing to divide Iraq, there is no more room today for dis­cus­sion or debate, the deci­sive hour has come and every one should choose his real trench…What is requested from all the Iraqi Resis­tance fac­tions and all the Iraqi patri­otic forces should be the following:

    1– The imme­di­ate unity of all the Resis­tance fac­tions. The non exis­tence of the unity of all the Iraqi Resis­tance fac­tions and the rely­ing on ide­o­log­i­cal under­stand­ing, is a dan­ger­ous lacuna which might divide the Resis­tance instead of uni­fy­ing it.

    Our Party warns from the dan­gers of some known Islamic cur­rents which con­sider many of the fun­da­men­tal com­bat­ing fac­tions in the Iraqi Resis­tance and in the Iraqi patri­otic forces, as infi­dels or Tak­firis and fight them either by arms or through Tak­firi Fat­was.. This is the most dan­ger­ous sit­u­a­tion, fac­ing Iraq’ lib­er­a­tion. THE US EXPLOITED THIS BREACH IN AL ANBAR TO STRIKE ALL THE RESISTANCE FACTIONS UNDER THE PRETEXT OF FIGHTING AL QAEDA.

    In the past, every one includ­ing those who spread the Islamic faith, used to strike deals with the non Mus­lims to accel­er­ate vic­tory.. In mod­ern times, peo­ples didn’t get rid of colo­nial­ism unless through a global alliance which included all the anti colo­nial­ists forces..be [they] cler­ics or athe­ists as it hap­pened in Viet­nam.. So will those who use now infi­delity and faith as a cri­te­ria to divide the Resis­tance and the Iraqi patri­otic move­ment, ever com­pre­hend that this is exactly what serves the Occu­pa­tion and helps it stay instead of forc­ing it to with­draw..? Our Party, there­fore, sin­cerely calls upon all the com­bat­ing orga­ni­za­tions to let aside their divi­sion and to hold on to a real unity of all the com­bat­ants and trans­form the groups newly formed into a global com­bat­ing unity which includes all the fac­tions with­out excep­tion. This is the most impor­tant request to achieve vic­tory, foil and wreck the US Occu­pa­tion and Iran’ tac­tics to divide the Resistance.

    2– Get rid of any ide­o­log­i­cal rows in between the Resis­tance fac­tions for the time being.. for any dis­agree­ment now, can turn into a real ill feel­ing (fitna)! That is why all should avoid mutual sus­pi­cion or crit­i­ciz­ing each other

    3– The Iraqi patri­otic forces which back the Resis­tance should unite too in a global Front which includes every body. Indeed! Any delay is a sign of lack of aware­ness on what is going on in Iraq and on how to con­front dangers….
17. Alison says:

    October 30, 2007 at 11:09

    bARA­Bie, I repeat my urgent call (see above) to you and other read­ers of this blog to email their com­plaints about NDHF edi­tors to AMSI Press Office (press@heyetnet.org).

    Given that AMSI seems to regard these vile crea­tures as its friends (see above), it urgently needs to clar­i­fiy its own posi­tion with regard to the ongo­ing CONSPIRACY against the Ba’ath-led Jihad and Lib­er­a­tion Front (and the Iraqi National Resis­tance as a whole) involv­ing ex-Ba’athist usurper Mohammed You­nis Al-Ahmed, CIA agent Ayad Allawi and — as always — the Iraqi Islamic Party.
18. NEWSDESK HELSINKI FINLAND says:

    October 30, 2007 at 20:30

    @ ALL: What comes to the com­ments of Ali­son, urg­ing all to bother AMSI (and the Ulema) with nutty emails con­cern­ing NDHF cov­er­age, we’d like to point you out that this is not what AMSI rec­om­mends.

    They write:

    “On part of NDHF we are nei­ther respon­si­ble of their pol­icy nor have an offi­cial ties. They are a group who are try­ing to give reli­able and hid­den news about Iraq. The­fore they are mostly tak­ing news from AMSI which is impor­tant base for them.”

    “The issue of mali­cious dis­in­for­ma­tion about fac­tions and oth­ers is not known for us. We have not heard it before. Please also send your fears and com­ments to NDHF team includ­ing your sug­gest and infor­ma­tion. Because they are try­ing to spread trusted news which would be help­ful to the Iraqis. Their great efforts are to be appre­ci­ated in many ways as far as we know.”

    What comes to this, we per­fectly agree: if you have any com­plaints, you should pass them directly us, not both­er­ing AMSI, work­ing day and night against the occupier.

    Louhi, the NDHF “spokeseditor”

    @ Lady­Bird: thanx for your splen­did work + allow­ing us to dis­cuss here: your site is the best chat exist­ing: the com­ments appear­ing in the right cor­ner allows a fully trans­par­ent dis­cus­sion, which we appre­ci­ate very much. We only wished that there were more than 5 lat­est com­ments dis­played to make sure that we won’t miss any. Could you ask your Web­mas­ter to arrange that, adding the num­ber to say 15 is easy and cer­tainly for good (this won’t make the site any slower ;)

19. Pingback: NEWSDESK HELSINKI FINLAND

20. Pingback: Ba�ath Party: Al-Qaeda and the occupation behind civilians deaths :: from www.uruknet.info :: news from occupied Iraq - it