What is wrong with this map?

Posted on October 31, 2007 by Sappho

A map with an agenda, Abu Aard­vark wrote about this image [reported by qawim] which is cir­cu­lat­ing around Iraqi and Arab web­sites, but there one impor­tant point Abu Aard­vark missed in the map, about the half of Ramadi province was given to Kar­bala while the real­ity is; Kar­bala is the small­est Iraqi province [com­pare it with the image below], also notice that Kirkuk was given to the so called “mid­dle region”, the “dark mur­mur­ings” was about this.

This entry was posted in POLITICS. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to What is wrong with this map?

  1. Pingback: Abu Aardvark

  2. Pingback: missing links

  3. Pingback: Sargasso » 2006

  4. Pingback: Sargasso

  5. Pingback: What is wrong with this map? « Arab bARABie blog

  6. Lonh Live the South! says:
    November 2, 2007 at 02:23

    This is crazy! You need to go the Colom­bia Uni­ver­sity web­site where you can see the pre-1990 map of iraq before Sad­dam Hus­sein took 80% of Kar­bala lands.
    Sorry but it’s not gonna work. The old days are gone and now know­ing the truth is so easy. The cur­rent map of Iraq and the bor­ders will be changed soon and you just men­tioned Kirkuk so you already know that there will be changes.

  7. anti traitor says:
    November 3, 2007 at 10:13

    long live the south — u r noth­ing but another per­sian piece of sec­tar­ian shit.
    to hell with u and ur sec­tar­ian shias

  8. Furat Al-Samaraie says:
    November 5, 2007 at 18:31

    Wow, so now the word per­sian is an insult?

    What hap­pened to civilised debate?

  9. Pingback: About that map :: from www.uruknet.info :: news from occupied Iraq - it

  10. Pingback: BAGnewsNotes: Iraq: Breaking Up Is ... Easy To Visualize

  11. Pingback: Michael Shaw: Reading The Pictures: Birth Of Three Nations? - Politics on The Huffington Post

  12. Pingback: Ur Iraq Map - Dogpile Web Search