Rashideen Army: It is a media war

The leader of Rashideen Army issued an audio state­ment [fist time], a warn­ing calls for the Resis­tance fac­tions and mem­bers about the occu­pa­tion pro­pa­ganda media and intern strug­gles inside the fac­tion saying:

The enemy is fight­ing us with its media more than fight­ing us mil­i­tar­ily and they spent bil­lions of Dol­lars on this.….

.….Their first pri­or­ity right now is to con­vince the peo­ple that the best option for the cur­rent sit­u­a­tion is to pro­vide secu­rity, water, elec­tric­ity and fuel instead of resist­ing the occu­pa­tion and lib­er­ate the country…their real aim is to imple­ment this ideas in people’s heads that the prob­lem is; pro­vid­ing the ser­vices prob­lem and for­get the big­ger goals….

This entry was posted in POLITICS. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Rashideen Army: It is a media war

  1. Pingback: <イラク情勢ニュース URUK NEWS> 速報&コメント - Yahoo!ジオシティーズ

  2. Pingback: Rashideen Army: It is a media war :: from www.uruknet.info :: news from occupied Iraq - it

  3. Pingback: Anti-Imperialist :: View topic - Jaish al Rashideen: Statement from the Emir

  4. Furat Al-Samaraie says:

    This ‘army’ is just wahabaathy scum­bags and ex-professional rapists.

  5. Pingback: ɴͤĤƤäߤʤHappyߥ˥ƥ freeml [ե꡼२]

  6. @ All: Do note that Furat’s a twisted liar, and unfor­tu­nately in pos­ses­sion of some infor­ma­tion as shown by him want­ing to tar­get just the al-Rashideen Army.

    The thing is that Al-Rashideen is not a wahabaathy scum­backs, but one of our finest forces avail­able, a dia­mond among oth­ers in our orders-of-battle.

    Al-Rashideen Army is one with per­haps the most non-sectarian atti­tudes, famed for its all-over rep­re­sen­ta­tion of mem­bers, includ­ing not only Sun­nis, but Shi’ites, Kurds and mem­bers of other sects as well.

    Here’s the NDHF cov­er­age on Al-Rashideen army from this autumn:
    http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/search?q=al-rashideen+army

    And a piece on al-Rashideen army from LB cov­er­age repro­duced in full:

    Inter­view with Al-Rashideen Army: First we must defeat the occu­pa­tion, then all those who want to harm Iraq
    http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/07/25/interview-with-al-rashideen-army-first-we-must-defeat-the-occupation-then-all-those-who-want-to-harm-iraq/#more-2067

    This inter­view was pub­lished on islamtoday,

    Abu Mohammed Al-Zubaydi,Chief of the polit­i­cal bureau of the Al-Rashideen Army, liv­ing in one of Baghdad’s sub­urbs, a spe­cial­ist phar­ma­cist, rejects the clas­si­fi­ca­tion of the Iraqi resis­tance between a national Islam and inter­na­tional Islam.

    Al-Zubaydi, iden­ti­fies Al-Rashideen Army as objec­tive with very clear goal:

    Is a fac­tion of the resis­tance, which is work­ing to lib­er­ate Iraq, pre­serve its unity, and to destroy the Amer­i­can project with all its prod­ucts, and the estab­lish­ment of a jus­tice state which does not exceed the human rights.

    Zubaidi con­firms that Al-Rashideen Army’s polit­i­cal per­spec­tives is not lim­ited to the lib­er­a­tion of Iraq from occu­pa­tion, but take into account that the con­flict is the US cul­tural and strate­gic dimen­sions; He says:

    Al-Rashideen Army does not stop with its mil­i­tary appear­ances, but go deep in under­stand­ing the occu­pa­tion project, which is not aimed at Iraq alone, .. The occu­pa­tion pro­gram begins with the occu­pa­tion of this coun­try, and sequen­tially aims against Ara­bism and Islam every­where, Al-Rashideen high com­man­ders are fol­low­ing these goals and moti­va­tions of occu­pa­tion strat­egy and the role of the neo-conservatives and inter­na­tional Zionism.

    Based on the pre­vi­ous vision, Al-Rashideen Army puts its strate­gic vision, and iden­tify its options and posi­tions, “The army bat­tal­ions�? deal in the field accord­ing to a pro­gram aimed achiev­ing the near and far objectives …

    In the con­text of iden­ti­fy­ing Al-Rashideen Army’s his­tory and its strength com­pared with the other armed fac­tions Zubaidi says:

    Estab­lished at the first day of the occu­pa­tion, and began to col­lect weapons from the for­mer Iraqi Army mil­i­tary camps the sub­urbs of Bagh­dad, the Army announced its exis­tance at the same day when our fight­ers car­ried out an attack against a US occu­pa­tion patrol after nine days of the occu­pa­tion of Bagh­dad .., Al-Rashideen Army bat­tal­ions located in dif­fer­ent parts of Iraq, includ­ing the provinces of North and South.

    Regard­ing the polit­i­cal per­spec­tive of the army and its posi­tion on many issues Zubaidi con­firms that the army rejects the ongo­ing polit­i­cal process, con­sid­er­ing it in the ser­vice of the occu­pa­tion, but he refused-at the same time, the sec­tar­ian con­flict, and the logic of blas­phemy and treachery.

    When asked about the Fatwa of gen­eral Shi­ite heresy issued by some Sun­nis he say:

    The posi­tion of the army adults is clear and firm on this issue, we are against the killing of inno­cent civil­ians, under any pretext.

    On the other side; the army did not agree with other armed fac­tions that the so-called Iran­ian– Safavid occu­pa­tion is equal or worst than the Amer­i­can occu­pa­tion, as Zubaidi says:

    There is no doubt that Iran poses a major threat, but we believe that the dan­ger is the first Amer­i­can occu­pa­tion, The pen­e­tra­tion and Iran­ian pro­lif­er­a­tion, hap­pened because of the absence of Amer­i­can occu­pa­tion and if we defeat the Amer­i­can occu­pa­tion that would sub­side the Iran­ian threat, and if we defeat the US, we will be able to defeat all those who want to harm Iraq.

    Al-Rashideen Army dif­fers, too, with other armed fac­tions adopt­ing a cer­tain for­mula of the state they want after the with­drawal of occu­pa­tion from Iraq, it is — although the Islamic-oriented view that is the form of the state Iraqis agree on, which serve Iraqis reli­gion, their coun­try and the future of the com­ing generations.

  7. Furat Al-Samaraie says:

    LOL!!

    Just the Al Rashideen bastards?

    They are all in bed with each other.

    Telling them apart is impos­si­ble. You might as well try to fish out a spe­cific turd from a sewer.

  8. Islamic Army in Iraq put it recently thus:

    All mil­i­tary forces that tar­get the jihadist fac­tions are our enemy.
    http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/2007/11/top-news-iai-denying-media-lies-about.html

    Though a polit­i­cal agency, we do not like those tar­get­ing the jihadist fac­tions any more than IAI ;)

  9. Meryem says:

    @NDHF !Ya Basta!
    Remem­ber that the crim­i­nal inva­sion of Irak was based on lies. The result was the biggest crime
    against human­ity in mod­ern his­tory, the Iraqi Holo­caust. More than one mil­lion peo­ple
    died since 2003 because of the infa­mous pro­pa­ganda, spread by self declared “experts” who pre­sented “analy­sis” and bogus infor­ma­tion deliv­ered by ama­teur­ish jour­nal­ists and pro­fes­sional
    liars.
    NDHF Edi­tors: Regard­ing your false accu­sa­tions against the Ba’ath Party
    (Iraq Leaer­ship) and Sec­re­tary Gen­eral Izzet Ibrahim Al-Douri: As you are used to
    quote such “reli­able sources” like the IHT and Wash­ing­ton Post, please
    dont for­get to cite also Haaretz the next time!
    You dont absolutely know noth­ing about the Resis­tance. Who are you, stat­ing
    that the fac­tions being part of the Jihad and Lib­er­a­tion Front havent shot a sin­gle
    bul­let against the enemy? The names of the 22 fac­tions asso­ci­ated are of
    minor impor­tance. I would strongly rec­om­mend you to read first of all Mao
    Zen­dongs “On Guerilla War­fare” and dont for­get the sym­bol of the heroic Viet­namese peo­ple, Ho Chi Min.
    Dont con­fuse the armed resis­tance with your favourite com­puter games “fight­ing” against vir­tual mon­sters.
    Remem­ber that the engi­neer of the Heroic Iraqi Resis­tance was Mar­tyr Pres­i­dent Sad­dam Hus­sein, the
    hero of Iraq who sac­ri­ficed his life for his beloved home­land. No one of his com­rades did ever col­lab­o­rate
    with the enemy! They died with dig­nity and hon­our mur­dered by the invaders and their crim­i­nal stooges.
    Pres­i­dent Sad­dam Hus­sein and his com­rades who began the rev­o­lu­tion­ary bat­tle on the streets of Iraq
    are iden­ti­cal in their ideals and even some of their bat­tle tac­tics as Che Gue­vara or Ho Chi Minh.
    You should know that resis­tance fight­ers are not wear­ing name tags and uni­forms of their fac­tion.
    Guerilla war and armed resis­tance are a very clan­des­tine matter .

    Your vil­lain­ous dis­in­for­mat­tion cam­paign is more dan­ger­ous than an atomic bomb in the hands of a lunatic.
    I guess that the trai­tor Mohammed You­nis Al-Ahmed is one of the numer­ous heads of this ven­omous Hydra,
    this evil alliance called theunitedstatesofmonsters!

    By the way, the Press Office of AMSI has kindly informed me that you are not a mem­ber of their asso­ci­a­tion.
    So, I dont know who adopted you as a mem­ber of the ? The AMCIA, Al-CIAda, CiAllawi?
    You are part of The Betrayal sell­ing out the hon­ourable brave fight­ers* who are sac­ri­fic­ing their lifes and their souls for the lib­er­a­tion of their
    home­land. If you were seri­ously con­cerned about the present and the future of Iraq you would have called the dif­fer­ent fac­tions
    to UNITE IN THE RESISTANCE
    instead of cre­at­ing a wedge and spread­ing lies of mass destruction.

    All of us are strong as long as we are united, and all of us are weak as long as we are divided” (The Liv­ing Mar­tyr of Iraq, Pres­i­dent Sad­dam Hussein)

    http://aliveinbaghdad.org/2007/04/30/an-iraqi-fighter-reflects-on-saddam
    *An Iraqi Fighter Reflects on Sad­dam Hus­sein — 04.30.2007

    http://www.workers.org/2007/world/iraq-1025/

    http://www.iraqsolidaridad.org/2007/docs/22–10-07-Entrevista_Abu_Mohamad.html

  10. Furat Al-Samaraie says:

    all the jihadis are worth­less scumbags.

  11. bARABie says:

    furat you are noth­ing but a jew­ish mag­got pre­tend­ing to be Arab. hehe­he­heh roflmao, how easy it is to see through the mag­gots bullshit. ;)

  12. Furat Al-Samaraie says:

    What, no jews allowed?

    1– jews exist in iraq and existed before the unfor­tu­nate inci­dent many years ago which took place between your mum and that drunk rugby team.

  13. Furat Al-Samaraie says:

    2– at least I’m writ­ing under my real name, unlike you. You are prob­a­bly one of the baath’s pro­fes­sional rapists who used to work in Abu Ghraib when it was a cor­ner­stone of the baath dic­ta­tor­ship of terror.

    3– No mat­ter where i’m from, I have a right to com­ment on any issue. In fact, I know what i’m talkign about, unlike you. When you stop talkign out of your a**, then you have the right to comment.

  14. NEWSDESK HELSINKI FINLAND says:

    Who are you, stat­ing that the fac­tions being part of the Jihad and Lib­er­a­tion Front havent shot a sin­gle bul­let against the enemy? The names of the 22 fac­tions asso­ci­ated are of minor impor­tance.“
    – We cover daily more of the Armed Iraqi Resis­tance com­bat announce­ments than any­body in the Eng­lish cyber world. This is why we’re utterly trou­bled of 21 unknown resis­tance fac­tions (we known the Naqsha­bandiyah, the al-Douri group) appear­ing, then start­ing to nego­ti­ate with the U.S. pos­ing as the resistance.

    trai­tor Mohammed You­nis Al-Ahmed is one of the numer­ous heads of this ven­omous Hydra“
    – Every­one has kept telling about M. You­nis Al-Ahmed being a trai­tor with­out any details (except a non­sen­si­cal claim that he once nego­ti­ated, rub­bish in the sense that there is sel­dom a war where there are no some kind of nego­ti­a­tions every here and then), so our Analy­sis Team found out about him com­pil­ing next to every­thing uncon­tra­dic­tory that’s avail­able in the inter­net. What we found out about him is in this report that we com­piled some time ago:

    On Baath Party I: Hom­mage à Iraqi Army 5th Corps Head­quar­ters and the Al-Jihad and Reform Front
    http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/2007/11/on-baath-party-i-hommage-iraqi-army-5th.html

    We do not know You­nis but from what we found out, we even less under­stand why is he, obvi­ously (if there is not some­thing very essen­tial we have missed) a hero of Iraq, called trai­tor. The more we hear such base­less claims the worse things get, we begin­ning to think the truth must be the oppo­site. We try to be mod­er­ate, but unbacked claims won’t help that at all.

    We’d be most delighted if some­body — with many baathists around — would tell us why exactly You­nis is so absolute trai­tor and with good facts. What’s all this mess about? An inter­nal power strug­gle of who’s got a party lead­er­ship? If so, we must say that’s shame­less crap.

    There are thou­sands of Iraqis dying and one Baath here or there means noth­ing in that. All that means is to com­bat the occu­pa­tion so to throw it out.

    the Press Office of AMSI has kindly informed me that you are not a mem­ber of their asso­ci­a­tion.“
    – We’re per­fectly aware of that. Last time it was Ali­son who had the same idea of us hav­ing stated such a thing, so we pub­lished the full email exchange here:
    http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/11/06/ba%e2%80%99ath-party-statement-about-istanbul-conference/

    If you were seri­ously con­cerned about the present and the future of Iraq you would have called the dif­fer­ent fac­tions to UNITE IN THE RESISTANCE
    – What comes to the “UNITE IN THE RESISTANCE” we whole­heat­edly agree, but as it is we’re in a bit more com­pli­cated position:

    §1. NDHF sel­dom, if never has “news” of its own. We’ve sworn our obe­di­ence (in the sense defined by the term Islam) to AMSI, to the Iraqi Resis­tance and what the most impor­tant, to the Iraqi peo­ple of what­ever sect or non-sect we don’t mind. We side them all as long as they’re not hope­lessly entan­gled with the crimes of the occu­piers (in which case the issue does not belong to us, but to the Iraqis).

    §2. As Finns we do not pos­sess any kind of pre­set axioms (such as pro or con­tra Baath) or inside infor­ma­tion that would help us for­ward, but instead we have to fig­ure and learn and con­firm every sin­gle detail by our­selves, which has been and is some­what com­pli­cated, espe­cially in a hot and heat­ing phase of war.

    §3. So to con­firm the accu­racy of our infer­ences, we’ve started this autumn by defin­ing both the armed and polit­i­cal Iraqi Resis­tance. You can fol­low the devel­op­ment of our under­stand­ing in the three con­se­quent reports (the newest replac­ing the older ones):
    (a) ANALYSIS: The Iraqi Resis­tance in Sep­tem­ber 2007: The last year of the occu­pa­tion in Iraq is to begin
    (Update 1: The posi­tions of Iraqi Hamas, Ansar al-Sunna and AMSI expli­cated)
    http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/2007/09/analysis-iraqi-resistance-in-september.html
    (b) IRAQ: On AMSI Open Let­ter and the Form­ing of the Jihad Islamic Front of National Lib­er­a­tion
    http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/2007/09/iraq-on-amsi-open-letter-and-forming-of.html
    © The Orders-of-Battle of the Armed Iraqi Resis­tance Fronts in 24th of Octo­ber 2007 and their Corol­lar­ies to the Cur­rent Sit­u­a­tion in the War on Ter­ror
    http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/2007/10/hot-news-orders-of-battle-of-armed.html

    §4. After defin­ing the hard-core mem­bers of the Iraqi Resis­tance we pro­ceeded with tak­ing their strat­egy as the basis of our report­ing and think­ing, and the bot­tom line at this moment is this:

    Lead­ers of the three groups [Speak­ing in Dam­as­cus, the spokes­men for the three groups — the 1920 Rev­o­lu­tion Brigades, Ansar al-Sunna and Iraqi Hamas], who did not use their real names in the inter­view, said the new front, which brings together the main Sunni-based armed organ­i­sa­tions except al-Qaida and the Ba’athists

    http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2007/10/08/propaganda-syria-and-iraqi-resistance/

    §5. So the Iraqi Resis­tance strat­egy starts with exclud­ing al-Qaida and the Baath. Rather than tak­ing any atti­tudes pro or against, we pro­ceed with find­ing out why (the well-armed resis­tance fac­tions already know­ing the answers they do not need to explain, do they?).

    So, we’re there “at your ser­vice” to find out why the “UNITE IN THE RESISTANCE” call of the Armed Iraqi Resis­tance (i.e. those who decide about these mat­ters really) excludes al-Qaida and the Baath. What al-Qaida and what baath they mean pre­cisely (this is not a triv­ial issue). Why they want to exclude these par­ties? (The answer for exclud­ing some­one in the resis­tance cir­cles is always the same: not ide­ol­ogy, but col­lab­o­ra­tion). So, who are the collaborators?

    §7. the prob­lem with Jihad and Lib­er­a­tion are myr­iad:
    (1) It hasn’t taken any con­tact with the real Armed Resis­tance Force in Iraq (Al-Jihad & Change, Reform and the South­ern Front) so to join these.
    (2) Just as we antic­i­pated in our pre­vi­ous report­ing:
    IRAQ: The Orders-of-Battle and the Strate­gic Sit­u­a­tion of the Occu­piers of Iraq, the United States of Israel and Iran in Novem­ber 2007
    http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/2007/10/iraq-orders-of-battle-and-strategic.html
    the J & L for­ma­tions (such as Knights of The Land of Two Rives) begun to appear in the orders-of-the-battle of the enemy forces. This was soon later reported by us here:
    On the “Knights” of the “Brigades of the Jihad in the Land of the Two Rivers“
    http://theunitedstatesofmonsters.blogspot.com/2007/11/on-knights-of-brigades-of-jihad-in-land.html
    We were and still are some­what unhappy about such turn of events as the Sal­va­tion Coun­cils are a well-known enemy mer­ce­nary force pool ris­ing peo­ple sid­ing with the occu­pa­tion to kill the Iraqi Resis­tance forces. Any­one proven doing that becomes an enemy of NEWSDESK HELSINKI FINLAND, because we, as how­ever mod­est, as a IR fac­tion we pro­tect our com­bat forces, because these offer pro­tec­tion to the Iraqi peo­ple now in the mid­dle of a bat­tle­field the occu­pa­tion has turned the coun­try into.
    (3) What comes to the Baath nego­ti­a­tions, we expect the phony “debaathi­fi­ca­tion” come in first. After that the oil rob­bery law fol­lows, if the polit­i­cal rec­on­cil­i­a­tion with the baath is achieved. We keep eye on these issues, never mind­ing loy­al­ties of any kind except to the Armed Iraqi Resis­tance, the real Guardian Angels of the Iraqi People.

    We freely admit that we may have inter­preted the sit­u­a­tion wrongly, but as mem­bers of the Iraqi Resis­tance we pro­tect this force from any attacks, because this is the sole force that has the on-the-spot capa­bil­ity of pro­tect­ing the Iraqi people.

  15. Furat Al-Samaraie says:

    The pri­or­i­ties for any real resis­tance move­ment would be to:

    ensure a return to civil life nor­mally
    restore the basic infra­struc­ture
    exter­mi­nate the Qa’ada and Baath criminals.

    If a grou pisn’t doing that, they are — know­ingly or not– work­ing for the wahabaathy forces.

  16. @ Furat, on “The pri­or­i­ties for any real resis­tance move­ment would be to: ensure a return to civil life nor­mally, restore the basic infrastructure”

    - Indeed. But the pre­con­di­tion for these goals is what all the Resis­tance groups now agree upon: all the occu­piers of Iraq must be expelled first.

    The U.S. — the main fist of the death squads — must go. Then Iran. Then Israel. And all the oth­ers with them.

    So the com­bat is now about maul­ing and destroy­ing the occu­pa­tion forces so to “help” them to find the exit.

    With that all the occu­pa­tion projects (includ­ing their pup­pet orga­ni­za­tions) fall by definition.

  17. Furat Al-Samaraie says:

    what they are all work­ing towards is the return of the baath occupation.

    Being agents of the occu­pa­tion, they are no more ‘resis­tance’ than any Tal­iban wifebeater ‘resist­ing’ his wife’s attempts at self-defence.