<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sistani conditionally approved the security agreement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/06/04/sistani-conditionally-approved-the-security-agreement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/06/04/sistani-conditionally-approved-the-security-agreement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iraq: Security Framework agreement and associated Status of Forces Agreement - Upsize This</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/06/04/sistani-conditionally-approved-the-security-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-80639</link>
		<dc:creator>Iraq: Security Framework agreement and associated Status of Forces Agreement - Upsize This</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=2697#comment-80639</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/...8_06/013855.phphttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/mi...rol-840512.htmlhttp://www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/06/04/sist...rity-agreement/  -------------------- opinions were like kittens, i was giving them away [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[…] <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/...8_06/013855.phphttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/mi...rol-840512.htmlhttp://www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/06/04/sist...rity-agreement/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/…8_06/013855.phphttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/mi…rol-840512.htmlhttp://www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/06/04/sist…rity-agreement/</a>  ——————– opinions were like kittens, i was giving them away […]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GlobalVoices ReFeed for Reuters: Published items (items 1 to 50)</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/06/04/sistani-conditionally-approved-the-security-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-80580</link>
		<dc:creator>GlobalVoices ReFeed for Reuters: Published items (items 1 to 50)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=2697#comment-80580</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Sistani conditionally approved the security agreement   &#160;    One thing need to be mentioned, According to alkhaleej newspaper, Arab League spokesman denied reports of sending Arab forces to Iraq, no further details about who reported this, but few days ago Haikal said that in a period of two years Arab countries will send their military forces to Iraq, so I don&#8217;t if [...] [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[…] Sistani conditionally approved the security agreement        One thing need to be mentioned, According to alkhaleej newspaper, Arab League spokesman denied reports of sending Arab forces to Iraq, no further details about who reported this, but few days ago Haikal said that in a period of two years Arab countries will send their military forces to Iraq, so I don’t if […] […]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sistani conditionally approved the security agreement :: www.uruknet.info :: informazione dall'Iraq occupato :: news from occupied Iraq :: - it</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/06/04/sistani-conditionally-approved-the-security-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-80578</link>
		<dc:creator>Sistani conditionally approved the security agreement :: www.uruknet.info :: informazione dall'Iraq occupato :: news from occupied Iraq :: - it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=2697#comment-80578</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...]         ::  Article nr. 44601 sent on 05-jun-2008 07:35 ECT www.uruknet.info?p=44601Link: www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/06/04/sistani-conditionally-approved-the-security-agree&#160;&#160;&#160;me...::  The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[…]         ::  Article nr. 44601 sent on 05-jun-2008 07:35 ECT <a href="http://www.uruknet.info?p=44601Link" rel="nofollow">http://www.uruknet.info?p=44601Link</a>: <a href="http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/06/04/sistani-conditionally-approved-the-security-agree&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;me...:" rel="nofollow">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/06/04/sistani-conditionally-approved-the-security-agree   me…:</a>:  The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not […]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Washington Monthly</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/06/04/sistani-conditionally-approved-the-security-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-80601</link>
		<dc:creator>The Washington Monthly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=2697#comment-80601</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;claims that details of the long term deal for maintaining US troops in Iraq sought by the Bush administration (the Security Framework agreement and associated Status of Forces Agreement) have leaked to the Independent. Similardetailshave emerged in Arab media in recent days as well. Nevertheless, to be taken with a grain of salt and all: Under the terms of the new treaty, the Americans would retain the long-term use of more than 50 bases in Iraq. American negotiators are also&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->claims that details of the long term deal for maintaining US troops in Iraq sought by the Bush administration (the Security Framework agreement and associated Status of Forces Agreement) have leaked to the Independent. Similardetailshave emerged in Arab media in recent days as well. Nevertheless, to be taken with a grain of salt and all: Under the terms of the new treaty, the Americans would retain the long-term use of more than 50 bases in Iraq. American negotiators are also<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obsidian Wings</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/06/04/sistani-conditionally-approved-the-security-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-80602</link>
		<dc:creator>Obsidian Wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=2697#comment-80602</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;claims that details of the long term deal for maintaining US troops in Iraq sought by the Bush administration (the Security Framework agreement and associated Status of Forces Agreement) have leaked to the Independent. Similardetailshave emerged in Arab media in recent days as well. Nevertheless, to be taken with a grain of salt and all: Under the terms of the new treaty, the Americans would retain the long-term use of more than 50 bases in Iraq. American negotiators are also&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->claims that details of the long term deal for maintaining US troops in Iraq sought by the Bush administration (the Security Framework agreement and associated Status of Forces Agreement) have leaked to the Independent. Similardetailshave emerged in Arab media in recent days as well. Nevertheless, to be taken with a grain of salt and all: Under the terms of the new treaty, the Americans would retain the long-term use of more than 50 bases in Iraq. American negotiators are also<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

