No security agreement without the supreme-clerics approval

Just remem­ber that what­ever the Maliki or other so called Iraqi politi­cians are say­ing about the U.S. — Iraq secu­rity agree­ment, SOFA or long pres­ence [what­ever you like to call it], at the end the Najaf Hawza and supreme cler­ics say the last word.

This is also what Al-Saghir wants us to know, in his inter­view today on Al-Qabas he said that the par­lia­ment agree­ment is the end of the story after that comes the Hawza [High-references] accord on the agreement:

The agree­ment will be pre­sented to the par­lia­ment and then the supreme cler­ics will decide.

Added his own [or the high-references] three points conditions.

- The pres­ence of a timetable for the withdrawal.

- No immu­nity to any per­son or [secu­rity] com­pany of the occu­pa­tion forces.

- The agree­ment con­tains ambigu­ous terms need to be clar­i­fied, such as the def­i­n­i­tion of ter­ror­ism, not every per­son who resisted for his home­land is a terrorist.

This entry was posted in POLITICS and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.