Two arti­cles crit­i­cize the U.S. pres­sure on the Iraqi gov­ern­ment came from an unex­pected sources. The arti­cles pub­lished today on news­pa­per reflect the coun­tries opin­ions because both are offi­cial newspaper.

But let start with this one [which is not one of the two] pub­lished today on Iraqi Dawa news­pa­per which mir­rors Maliki’s Dawa Party opin­ion. The arti­cle “crit­i­cizes” the state­ment issued by the U.S. Defense Sec­re­tary Robert Gates:

In his state­ment, Min­is­ter Gates could not hide the signs of des­per­a­tion, refer­ring to accept­ing SOFA or his U.S. forces will allow the vio­lence of Al-Qaeda and other hid­den forces to back again

The Min­is­ter [Gates] for­got that facts on the ground have changed, and the Iraqi peo­ple imposed secu­rity when they rejected all kinds of eth­nic and sec­tar­ian vio­lence and tension.

Jor­dan­ian Addus­tour news­pa­per edi­to­r­ial which is the Jor­dan­ian gov­ern­ment opin­ion says that “The secu­rity agree­ment is a man­date with a new guise”:

The threats of keep­ing arti­cle VII of the United Nation or sign the agree­ment is a bul­ly­ing pol­icy and vio­la­tion of arti­cle 52 of Vienna Law.

Wash­ing­ton should accept the deci­sion made by the Iraqi peo­ple and get rid of its colo­nial illusion.

And this one from Egypt­ian semi-official news­pa­per Al-Gomhuria:

The U.S. Defense Min­is­ter and his top offi­cers threat­ened Iraq with dire con­se­quences if they fail to sign the agree­ment with his government.

A Secu­rity agree­ment which gives dubi­ous legit­i­macy to the pres­ence of the occu­pa­tion forces, gives them immu­nity, and doesn’t pun­ish the crimes of the bru­tal killing and tor­ture of the Iraqi people.

Large fac­tion of the Iraqi peo­ple showed their rejec­tion to this agree­ment … But the U.S. admin­is­tra­tion insists on humil­i­at­ing the Iraqis and sub­mits the agree­ment against their will.

The Iraqi national resis­tance against the occu­pa­tion is the only force can face of Amer­i­can threats and force the occu­pa­tion forces to with­draw unconditionally.

6 Comments

  1. When did the I.S gov­ern­ment ever care about Iraqis? They spill Iraqi blood for their own ambi­tions, which has hap­pened both directly and indi­rectly since the 50’s. What’s more sur­pris­ing is that amer­i­can cit­i­zens buy this crap and say that Iraqis should shut up and let the U.S do what­ever they want since they “saved us” from a tyrant who man­aged to rise to power with their help to BEGIN WITH.

    One could describe MANY Amer­i­cans as flocks of dumb sheeps who’ve gath­ered to jump off from a cliff.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] click here if the arti­cle does not […]

  2. […] to Iraq Arab news­pa­pers: Iraqi resis­tance can force the Amer­i­cans to with­draw uncon­di­tion­ally 12 hours […]

  3. […] Mid­dle East Mad­ness Arab news­pa­pers: Iraqi resis­tance can force the Amer­i­cans to with­draw unconditionally […]

Arab newspapers: Iraqi resistance can force the Americans to withdraw unconditionally

This article was written October 23rd, 2008, with the mathematical number of 6 contributions.