Pub­lished on Jor­dan­ian news­pa­per Fac­tjo today say­ing that sources leaked the details of the ten secret arti­cles in the Secu­rity Agree­ment with­out report­ing fur­ther details.

I don’t know the authen­tic­ity of the this, but for “his­tor­i­cal” rea­sons and future devel­op­ments, I will trans­late the exact article:

1– U.S. troops have the right to build and mil­i­tary camps and bases, and these camps will pro­vide the sup­port to the Iraqi army, it’s num­ber will be sub­jected to the secu­rity con­di­tion, which will be decided by the Iraqi gov­ern­ment, with of with the U.S. embassy in Bagh­dad, Amer­i­can field com­man­ders, the Iraqi Defense Min­istry and the offi­cial authorities.

2– The need to change the agree­ment to a treaty.

3– Iraqi Gov­ern­ment has no right to sub­ject U.S. troops and ser­vice per­son­nel to the Iraqi judi­ciary sys­tem, and to extend immu­nity to include secu­rity com­pa­nies and contractors.

4– The author­i­ties of U.S. forces are not deter­mined by the Iraqi gov­ern­ment, the Iraqi gov­ern­ment has no right limit the move­ment of the U.S. forces, or the mil­i­tary camps occu­pied area or the roads the forces use.

5– The U.S. troops the right to build secu­rity cen­ters, includ­ing pris­ons to pre­serve security.

6– The U.S. troops have the right to the arrest of those who threaten the peace and secu­rity with­out the need for autho­riza­tion from the Iraqi gov­ern­ment or its institutions.

7– The U.S. forces have the right to use the Iraqi ground, water and air to strike any coun­try threat­ens the inter­na­tional and regional peace and secu­rity, the Gov­ern­ment of Iraq and its constitution.

8– Inter­na­tional, regional rela­tions and treaties should be con­sulted by U.S. gov­ern­ment in advance to pre­serve secu­rity and the constitution.

9– U.S. troops to con­trol the Min­istry of Defense, Inte­rior and the Iraqi intel­li­gence for a period of 10 years, and even the qual­ity of the arms are a sub­ject of approval and con­sul­ta­tion with U.S. forces.

10– The timetable for the pres­ence of the U.S. troops is a long-term, the deci­sion depends on the secu­rity con­di­tions in Iraq, and to be reviewed between the Iraqi gov­ern­ment and U.S. Government.

3 Comments

  1. Jon Claerbout

    Point #9 some­how reminds me of Niger­ian scams. In other words, the doc­u­ment seems pre­pos­ter­ous. Thanks any­way for trying.

  2. Looks to me like a descrip­tion of the way things are. The SOFA is noth­ing but a pre­tense to obser­va­tion of law.

    The occu­pa­tion itself vio­lates every stan­dard of law. In fact there is no such thing as law when it is vio­lated to such an extent and the per­pe­tra­tor suf­fers no pun­ish­ment accord­ing to law.

    The aggres­sor and his pup­pets have had a lot of fun argu­ing these terms against those terms but the point is only to mis­lead the masses. What­ever the occu­pa­tion puts on paper, it is going to do what it has to do.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. pur­suant to the Agree­ment between the United States and the Repub­lic of Iraq on the With­drawal of United States Forces from Iraq and the Orga­ni­za­tion of Their Activ­i­ties dur­ing Their Tem­po­rary Pres­ence in Iraq.Roads to Iraqcites a report in the Jor­dan­ian news­pa­per Fac­tjo of ten arti­cles in a secret agree­ment, includ­ing: 7– The U.S. forces have the right to use the Iraqi ground, water and air to strike any coun­try threat­ens the inter­na­tional and regional peace and

  2. […] I for one believe that some lawyers could argue a lot about them. There are also, likely false, rumors of secret SOFA arti­cles. How would those pass the Iraqi […]

Ten secret SOFA articles

This article was written November 25th, 2008, with the mathematical number of 3 contributions.