Resistance group asks Shiite clerics: What to do with those who signed the Agreement?

I reported about the plot of the Islamic Party very briefly and cov­ered by Bad­ger in details, it seems that there is some kind of dis­pute among the “mother-organization” (Islamic Broth­er­hood) and the political-wing (Islamic Party).

A state­ment released by the Islamic Broth­er­hood in Iraq, uses “soft-language” crit­i­ciz­ing SOFA’s miss­ing points, such com­pen­sa­tion for dam­ages, the pro­tec­tion of Iraqi money and build­ing the army. The state­ment also includes a rejec­tion of the U.S. pres­ence in Iraq.

Signs of split between the two? Not sure yet.

state­ment

We are proud with your SOFA rejec­tion Fat­was and we would like to ask those who issued them [Fat­was] to advice us on how to treat those who signed the Agree­ment … What to do with those who lig­itimezed the fight against the Mujahdeen and called them ter­ror­ists, those who autho­rized the enemy to fight us…

To answer the ques­tion of why Sunni par­tic­i­pat­ing in sign­ing the Agree­ment was very essen­tial and even much more impor­tant than the other Shi­ites fac­tions [Sadrists], Jor­dan­ian writer Al-Za’tra answers:

It was very impor­tant for other polit­i­cal blocs to dis­trib­ute the “sin” of sign­ing the Agree­ment among all eth­nic, sec­tar­ian fac­tions to show that there are oppo­si­tion and sup­porter not within the Shi­ites only, but Sun­nis also.

Good to read about the prepa­ra­tions of Iraqi resis­tance and oppo­si­tion group to hold a anti-SOFA con­fer­ence in Beirut soon, and also good news to read Iraqi woman writer Haifa Zankana will start her own oppo­si­tion group.