Hiatus for the coming two days, Twitter continues.
While Maliki renewed his attacks on Saudi Arabia yesterday, Ammar Al-Hakim thanked Saudi Arabia for its “supportive role” all these years (direct reaction from Dawa’s Al-Adeeb saying that Iraq wants to renew its relation with Saudi Arabia).
While Maliki pushes to escalate the Syria — Iraq crisis, Adil Abdul Mehdi sent a condolences message to the Syrian Vice President Farouk al-Sharaa with the death of his brother.
So, it is very clear that the news of Maliki’s “State of Law” to join INA are still rumors, and this is what Maliki said yesterday in an answer to a question addressed to him by a journalist:
[Joins] a coalition that allows each side to keep its structure, name and privacy … “State of Law” will welcome this agreement with INA if they agree on this condition … to form a National Unity Coalition.
A flexible answer and the reason explained today by Al-Hayat reporter Mushriq Abbas:
The shape and the size of the threat posed by the Allawi — Mutlaq coalition will determine the relationship between Maliki and Al-Hakim — Al-Sadr.
The Shiite leaders will reach a settlement may not necessarily require unity in the political form or a single electoral list, but expected to get pre-election settlement urging the Shiite street to vote for “State of law” and “INA” together under the slogan “prevent the return of Baathists”.
And this is exactly what reported today on Awan:
Maliki asked INA to organize the ballot paper in a way that both names of the coalitions to take place on a separate places on the two corners of the joined ballot paper, but his proposal was turned down by INA, for reasons including the fact that the Electoral Commission would not agree to this procedure, because it is not being done anywhere in the world, as well as its complexity and violation the internal regulations of the Office.
Agrees Al-Qabas corespondent Nazar Hatim saying that both Shiite sides will meet each others sooner or later to face their common opponent Allawi — Mutlaq, but:
Under the new law — the voter can choose three candidates, this raises fear and anxiety among many people in the political arena — Following the adoption of the open list, the public’s desire to punish all those who brought little benefits to the public.