The U.S. stressed many on its neutrality in the current “coalition formation” crisis, but deep inside they proffered to Allawi and Maliki in one coalition. This is expressed very plainly by the former U.S. ambassador in Iraq Ryan Crocker in his interview on the French newspaper 20 Minutes:
Q- What do you think of Iyad Allawi?
A- Allawi and (his rival, former Prime Minister) Nouri Al-Maliki are two sides of the same coin. Both are nationalists. They held a similar speech during the campaign, speaking of the Iraqi identity.
The U.S. finds itself faced with two options for the leadership in Iraq (excluding the Kurds), the first led by Maliki, and the second posed by Allawi. Here, both men through their statements and the media are trying to give the impression that they preferred by Washington.
The U.S. loves Maliki, and beliefs that he is straight, not corrupt, and serious to lead Iraq towards a better future. But the Prime Minister raised some fears among U.S. officials in some of his actions, such as tendency to dominate power, and raising controversy about the possibility to turn into an Iraqi Vladimir Putin” (who succeeded in reaching to the one-man rule with a democracy cover).
The U.S. also does not mind the return of Allawi to head the government, but still, Allawi is limited to the representation of the Sunnis, who are still feared by both the Kurds and the Shiite majority.
Despite the fact that the U.S. will accept to see Al-Maliki and the Kurds in power, but they would like to see Allawi and his Sunni allies also.
Accordingly, the most favorite U.S. scenario in Iraq is a coalition cabinet that brings Maliki, Allawi, and the Kurds. A solid coalition dominates the majority of the seats in the parliament, and will represent all the three groups in Iraq (Shiites and Sunnis and Kurds).
But the American officials aware of the difficulty of achieving the above scenario because multiple factors (ie … personal hatred between Alawi and Maliki), which forces the U.S. to accept a worst-case scenario, Iran’s allies in power, along with Maliki, at the expense of Allawi.
Here the United States will continue to play a “neutral role”, and will continue to seek long-term partnership with Iraq, no matter who in the Iraqi government or the presidency.
Pingback: * Why the U.S. wants a coalition of Allawi and Maliki? | Dinar Daddy's Tidbits