The “round-table” rejection

Adding to my pre­vi­ous post about Al-Iraqiya’s rejec­tion of the round-table talks. If any­thing agreed upon by both “State of Law” and “Al-Iraqiya” then the rejec­tion of the “round-table”. Why this rejec­tion, while both insist on a gov­ern­ment with the par­tic­i­pa­tion of all polit­i­cal blocs, which the core of the “round-table”.

When we talk about the round-table idea pro­posed by Ammar Al-Hakim the leader of the Supreme Coun­cil. This table, which can be estab­lished on the fol­low­ing rule:

All par­ties who par­tic­i­pated in the elec­tions to sit at a round-table and those who man­aged to obtain 90 seats in the elec­tion will be equal to those who man­aged to obtain two or three seats, since the 90 seats bloc rep­re­sents a fac­tion of the Iraqi peo­ple and also those with two, three seats rep­re­sent another fac­tions of the Iraqis.

Between this and that and all this mess, nego­ti­a­tions progress has been post­poned and all the eyes are wait­ing man­ual re-counting in Bagh­dad, a deci­sion forced on IHEC by Maliki’s gov­ern­ment (which will take two months at least accord­ing to the IHEC). The Kur­dish Alliance made their point very clear say­ing that if any fraud dis­cov­ered, their demand will be to re-count in Mosul and Kirkuk, which means, this may open the door to the re-count of all the votes in Iraq.