The renewed U.S. role in Iraq

It seems that the Kurds are started to take Allawi’s side, as reported by the media in the last two days. Barazani con­firmed Allawi’s eli­gi­bil­ity to form the gov­ern­ment, and before him Tal­a­bani also said some­thing similar.

No love lost between the Kurds and Al-Iraqiya, but accord­ing to Al-Hayat; the Kurds changed their posi­tion after pres­sure from the U.S. on the Kurds to change their atti­tudes towards the Iraqi List

Accord­ing to the source:

There are move­ments by some for­eign sides and in coor­di­na­tion with some polit­i­cal blocs will soon unveil a sce­nario of a new gov­ern­ment may change in the bal­ance of the polit­i­cal equa­tion in the country.

Added:

The U.S. side has the upper hand in the polit­i­cal cards reshuf­fle in Iraq.

The above, started words exchange between the “State of Law” and the Kur­dish Alliance, after Dabagh (Maliki’s side­kick) asked to Kurds to join the oppo­si­tion and the Kurds answered to keep his advise to himself.

But if we can con­clude some­thing from the devel­op­ments above, then it is the renewed U.S. in the Iraqi polit­i­cal cri­sis, which we can notice in the state­ment of the UN rep­re­sen­ta­tive Ad Mlek­ert, who vis­ited Sis­tani lately and pro­posed to estab­lish a time-frame to form the Iraqi government.

Accord­ing to leaks of informed Iraqi polit­i­cal sources, it seems that the Amer­i­can admin­is­tra­tion is upset with the illog­i­cal pro­cras­ti­na­tion in the for­ma­tion of the Iraqi government.

Tal­a­bani intro­duced a diner invi­ta­tion to all polit­i­cal bloc to throw the blame on all politi­cians before he decide to take a deci­sion to ask the par­lia­ment to hold its first meet­ing, after he felt the U.S. renewed movements.

This entry was posted in POLITICS and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The renewed U.S. role in Iraq

  1. scott sullivan says:

    The key issue whether Obama/s inter­ven­tion in Iraqi pol­i­tics will con­tinue to rep­re­sent the reac­tionary pro-Confederate poli­cies of Jef­fer­son Davis and George W Bush, as opposed to the Com­mu­nist and Union­ist poli­cies of Abra­ham Lincoln.

    Pres­i­dent George W. wll go down in his­tory as the father of Iraq’s par­ti­tion. Bush and his Neo­Con ambas­sador to Iraq Zal­may Khalilzad were tires­less in pro­mot­ing polit­i­cal seces­sion by Kud­ish and Iran­ian extrem­ists who want to destroy a multi-ethnic Iraq by expelling all the Arabs, In the same way, Jef­fer­son Davis pro­moted the destruc­tion of a multi-ethnic USA by pro­mot­ing polit­i­cal seces­sion in the US south­ern states.

    Politi­cians like George Bush, Jefer­son Davis, Tal­a­bani, Barzani, and Ahmadine­jad pros­per only by fos­ter­ing racial hatred — Whites vs. Blacks in the USA, and Kurds and Shi’ites vs, Arabs in Iraq. For­tu­nately, lead­ers like Muq­tada al-Sadr have emerged in Iraq who are pre­pared to defend the Arabs and the cause of a multi-ethnic Iraq.

    Where will Obama stannd — with George Bush or with Muq­tada al-Sadr?

    Where will Pres­i­dent Obama stand — with

  2. Pingback: Happy Memorial Day - An Iraqi Boy Hides Behind A US Soldier | Prose Before Hos

  3. scott sullivan says:

    Obama-Sadr Axis in Iraq

    The key issue is ito deter­mine whether Obama/s inter­ven­tion in Iraqi pol­i­tics will con­tinue to rep­re­sent the reac­tionary pro-Confederate poli­cies of Jef­fer­son Davis and George W Bush, as opposed to the Com­mu­nist and Union­ist poli­cies of Abra­ham Lincoln.

    Pres­i­dent George W. wll go down in his­tory as the father of Iraq’s par­ti­tion. Bush and his Neo­Con ambas­sador to Iraq Zal­may Khalilzad were tires­less in pro­mot­ing polit­i­cal seces­sion by Kud­ish and Iran­ian extrem­ists, These extrem­ists want to destroy Iraq by con­fis­cat­ing all of the Arab oil at Kirkuk and Basra, thereby defundig Iraq’s cen­tral gov­ern­ment at Bagh­dad, and rhen by divid­ing Iraq into three eth­nic war­ring states. the Arabs, In a sim­i­lar fash­ion, Jef­fer­son Davis destroyed the multi-ethnic USA by pro­mot­ing polit­i­cal seces­sion by White racists in the US south­ern states.

    Politi­cians like George Bush, Jefer­son Davis, Tal­a­bani, Barzani, and Ahmadine­jad pros­per only by fos­ter­ing racial hatred — Whites vs. Blacks in the USA, and Kurds and Shi’ites vs, Arabs in Iraq. For­tu­nately, lead­ers like Muq­tada al-Sadr have emerged in Iraq who are pre­pared to pro­tect Iraq’s ter­ror­tial integrity, pro­tect the rights of Arabs and Pales­tini­ans, and pro­tect Iraq as a nulti-ethnic and demo­c­ra­tic state,

    Where will Obama stand on Iraqi issues— with the reac­tiomary George W. Bush and Jeff­fo­son Davis, or with Muq­tada al-Sadr and Abra­ham Lincoln?

    updated on 27 May 2010

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>