<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political scenarios after Al-Sadr’s meeting with Allawi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2010/07/20/political-scenarios-after-al-sadrs-meeting-with-allawi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2010/07/20/political-scenarios-after-al-sadrs-meeting-with-allawi/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2010/07/20/political-scenarios-after-al-sadrs-meeting-with-allawi/comment-page-1/#comment-89308</link>
		<dc:creator>scott sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=8520#comment-89308</guid>
		<description>Petraeus and Sadr Save Iraq 
Sep 19, 2007
By: Scott Sullivan  


President Bush can now accelerate the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, on 
a schedule determined by GEN. Petraeus, Prime Minister Maliki, and Muqtada 
al-Sadr. A Petraeus-Sadr initiative on US troop withdrawals would reinforce 
the breakthrough to victory made possible by Operation Surge.

Within the past few days, the Iraqis have made stunning gains in 
reintegrating their economy and political system. Thus, a weak and 
ethnic-based Iraqi confederacy is now out the window, despite wishes by the 
PKK, Kurdish president Barzani, and Iran&#039;s Nazi president Ahmadinejad. They 
all want to seize Iraq&#039;s oil by partitioning Iraq into ethnic mini-states, 
with the PKK taking Kirkuk while Iran and Ahmadinbejad&#039;s Revolutionary 
Guards (IRGC) would take Basra.

Instead of rolling over for the PKK and IRGC, Petraeus and Sadr pushed back 
and won a decisive victory for Iraq. Petraeus and Sadr first signed wide 
ranging political agreements -- See LA Times 12 September 2007. Both agreed 
on keeping Basra and Kirkuk in Iraqi hands, and to postpone Kirkuk&#039;s 
referendum that would shift Kirkuk and its oil reserves to control by 
Barzani and the PKK.

For their part, Barzani escalated with his decision to bypass Baghdad&#039;s 
state oil company by negotiating an oil exploration agreement directly with 
the Texas-based Hunt Oil Company. By signing this agreement, Barzani has 
alienated Petraeus and Sadr. Barzani has also alienated Iraqi PM Maliki, 
President Bush, as well as the major international oil companies, who prefer 
dealing with Baghdad.


The main answered question is what Sadr will demand for his cooperation on 
US troop withdrawals. It is obvious that Sadr will look for help for 
Baghdad&#039;s troubled oil ministry. The US will respond to Sadr&#039;s needs by 
rebuilding Baghdad&#039;s centralized oil ministry and opening relations between 
Sadr, Barzani. and the Iraqi Sunnis.

By strengthening Baghdad&#039;s oil ministry the US will enhance US relations 
with Sadr, who is the unofficial mayor of Baghdad; restore Sunni confidence 
in the Baghdad government as Sunni access to Iraq&#039;s oil revenues is 
restored; and pacify the Kurds, who are now challenging the Baghdad oil 
ministry&#039;s authority.

Finally, cooperation between Sadr and Petraeus will send a clear signal to 
Iran to back out of interference in Iraq&#039;s internal affairs.

In short, thanks to Bush, Petraeus, and Sadr, Iraq has quickly moved from a 
zone of crisis to a zone of opportunity. Congratulations all around!


  

Scott Sullivan is a former Washington government employee. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.
 




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

admin@assyrianconference.com  

Copyright © 2005-2007, AGC Media. All Rights Reserved. 
^ Back To Top</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Petraeus and Sadr Save Iraq<br />
Sep 19, 2007<br />
By: Scott Sullivan  </p>
<p>President Bush can now accelerate the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, on<br />
a schedule determined by GEN. Petraeus, Prime Minister Maliki, and Muqtada<br />
al-Sadr. A Petraeus-Sadr initiative on US troop withdrawals would reinforce<br />
the breakthrough to victory made possible by Operation Surge.</p>
<p>Within the past few days, the Iraqis have made stunning gains in<br />
reintegrating their economy and political system. Thus, a weak and<br />
ethnic-based Iraqi confederacy is now out the window, despite wishes by the<br />
PKK, Kurdish president Barzani, and Iran’s Nazi president Ahmadinejad. They<br />
all want to seize Iraq’s oil by partitioning Iraq into ethnic mini-states,<br />
with the PKK taking Kirkuk while Iran and Ahmadinbejad’s Revolutionary<br />
Guards (IRGC) would take Basra.</p>
<p>Instead of rolling over for the PKK and IRGC, Petraeus and Sadr pushed back<br />
and won a decisive victory for Iraq. Petraeus and Sadr first signed wide<br />
ranging political agreements — See LA Times 12 September 2007. Both agreed<br />
on keeping Basra and Kirkuk in Iraqi hands, and to postpone Kirkuk’s<br />
referendum that would shift Kirkuk and its oil reserves to control by<br />
Barzani and the PKK.</p>
<p>For their part, Barzani escalated with his decision to bypass Baghdad’s<br />
state oil company by negotiating an oil exploration agreement directly with<br />
the Texas-based Hunt Oil Company. By signing this agreement, Barzani has<br />
alienated Petraeus and Sadr. Barzani has also alienated Iraqi PM Maliki,<br />
President Bush, as well as the major international oil companies, who prefer<br />
dealing with Baghdad.</p>
<p>The main answered question is what Sadr will demand for his cooperation on<br />
US troop withdrawals. It is obvious that Sadr will look for help for<br />
Baghdad’s troubled oil ministry. The US will respond to Sadr’s needs by<br />
rebuilding Baghdad’s centralized oil ministry and opening relations between<br />
Sadr, Barzani. and the Iraqi Sunnis.</p>
<p>By strengthening Baghdad’s oil ministry the US will enhance US relations<br />
with Sadr, who is the unofficial mayor of Baghdad; restore Sunni confidence<br />
in the Baghdad government as Sunni access to Iraq’s oil revenues is<br />
restored; and pacify the Kurds, who are now challenging the Baghdad oil<br />
ministry’s authority.</p>
<p>Finally, cooperation between Sadr and Petraeus will send a clear signal to<br />
Iran to back out of interference in Iraq’s internal affairs.</p>
<p>In short, thanks to Bush, Petraeus, and Sadr, Iraq has quickly moved from a<br />
zone of crisis to a zone of opportunity. Congratulations all around!</p>
<p>Scott Sullivan is a former Washington government employee. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.</p>
<p>——————————————————————————–</p>
<p><a href="mailto:admin@assyrianconference.com">admin@assyrianconference.com</a>  </p>
<p>Copyright © 2005–2007, AGC Media. All Rights Reserved.<br />
^ Back To Top</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2010/07/20/political-scenarios-after-al-sadrs-meeting-with-allawi/comment-page-1/#comment-89306</link>
		<dc:creator>scott sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=8520#comment-89306</guid>
		<description>Baghdad, Damascus, Cairo, and Riyadh will dominate Middle East

Forget Iran and Turkey  -- they do not deserve to govern the Middle East.  Iran is unfit to rule the Middle East because it has embraced the Nazi doctrine.  Plus, Iran&#039;s top priority is not to advance the Middle East but to disrupt the Middle East by establishing a Strategic Corridor that would provide a safe  haven for terrorists and their  weapons to move from Germany to the pro-German Balkan states, to Turkey, Iran and Pakistan;

Iraq&#039;s top priority today is to pressure President Obama to send Gen Petraeus to Baghdad to warn Barzani, Talabani and Ahmadinejad that the US will no longer tolerate Kurdish and Iranian interference  in Iraq&#039;s internal affairs!


Op-ed:  Obama to assign Gen Petraeus to Baghdad?

Obama will regret his decision to replace Gen McChrystal with Gen Petraeus as commander of all US forces in Afghanistan.  Obama&#039;s stated rationale for the switch to Petraeus -- that Petraeus would be able to duplicate the success of his Iraqi surge stategy in Afghanistan -- does not hold water.  Today&#039;s Washington Post  carries a front page story that Petraeus&#039;s surge strategy failed in Iraq because it has been unable to gain support from Iraq&#039;s Sunni Arabs in Mosul. The Iraqi Arabs  in  Mosul, with strong support from al Qaeda and Saudi Arabia, continue to attack the Kurdish militias because Kurdish leaders like Barzani and Talibani, with tacit support from Iranian and US leaders like Gen Petraeus, make clear their intention to annex Kirkuk and its oil as soon as the US withdraws its forces from Iraq.  If Mosul explodes into civil war, thanks to Gen Petraeus&#039; inability to acknowledge or fix this problem, Mosul&#039;s conflict will bring down the Iraqi Accords in other parts of the country. 


In short, if Obama wants to be helpful he should appoint Petraeus as his envoy to Iraq to restrain Kurdish and Iranian aggression against Iraq, so as to protect the huge US investment there.  Meanwhile, Obama should reinstate Gen McChrystal as commander of US forces in Afghanistan, where McChrystal could build a powerful domestic and international United Front against fascist Pakistan and Iran. 

- Scott Sullivan 

 

 

ISSUES.... 07/26/2010 / - Send Us Your Issues 

ISSUES.... Inside, confidential and off the record

Is an independent journalist effort from Petroleumworld, on Inside, Confidential and Off The Record Information, its views are not necessarily those of Petroleumworld 




Legal information: Copyright/Disclaimer 

Copyright© 1999-2010 respective author or news agency. All rights reserved. 

We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors. 

Send this story to a friend

Your feedback is important to us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baghdad, Damascus, Cairo, and Riyadh will dominate Middle East</p>
<p>Forget Iran and Turkey  — they do not deserve to govern the Middle East.  Iran is unfit to rule the Middle East because it has embraced the Nazi doctrine.  Plus, Iran’s top priority is not to advance the Middle East but to disrupt the Middle East by establishing a Strategic Corridor that would provide a safe  haven for terrorists and their  weapons to move from Germany to the pro-German Balkan states, to Turkey, Iran and Pakistan;</p>
<p>Iraq’s top priority today is to pressure President Obama to send Gen Petraeus to Baghdad to warn Barzani, Talabani and Ahmadinejad that the US will no longer tolerate Kurdish and Iranian interference  in Iraq’s internal affairs!</p>
<p>Op-ed:  Obama to assign Gen Petraeus to Baghdad?</p>
<p>Obama will regret his decision to replace Gen McChrystal with Gen Petraeus as commander of all US forces in Afghanistan.  Obama’s stated rationale for the switch to Petraeus — that Petraeus would be able to duplicate the success of his Iraqi surge stategy in Afghanistan — does not hold water.  Today’s Washington Post  carries a front page story that Petraeus’s surge strategy failed in Iraq because it has been unable to gain support from Iraq’s Sunni Arabs in Mosul. The Iraqi Arabs  in  Mosul, with strong support from al Qaeda and Saudi Arabia, continue to attack the Kurdish militias because Kurdish leaders like Barzani and Talibani, with tacit support from Iranian and US leaders like Gen Petraeus, make clear their intention to annex Kirkuk and its oil as soon as the US withdraws its forces from Iraq.  If Mosul explodes into civil war, thanks to Gen Petraeus’ inability to acknowledge or fix this problem, Mosul’s conflict will bring down the Iraqi Accords in other parts of the country. </p>
<p>In short, if Obama wants to be helpful he should appoint Petraeus as his envoy to Iraq to restrain Kurdish and Iranian aggression against Iraq, so as to protect the huge US investment there.  Meanwhile, Obama should reinstate Gen McChrystal as commander of US forces in Afghanistan, where McChrystal could build a powerful domestic and international United Front against fascist Pakistan and Iran. </p>
<p>- Scott Sullivan </p>
<p>ISSUES.… 07/26/2010 / — Send Us Your Issues </p>
<p>ISSUES.… Inside, confidential and off the record</p>
<p>Is an independent journalist effort from Petroleumworld, on Inside, Confidential and Off The Record Information, its views are not necessarily those of Petroleumworld </p>
<p>Legal information: Copyright/Disclaimer </p>
<p>Copyright© 1999–2010 respective author or news agency. All rights reserved. </p>
<p>We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors. </p>
<p>Send this story to a friend</p>
<p>Your feedback is important to us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: * Political scenarios after Al-Sadr’s meeting with Allawi : Dinar Daddy&#039;s Tidbits</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2010/07/20/political-scenarios-after-al-sadrs-meeting-with-allawi/comment-page-1/#comment-89286</link>
		<dc:creator>* Political scenarios after Al-Sadr’s meeting with Allawi : Dinar Daddy&#039;s Tidbits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=8520#comment-89286</guid>
		<description>[...] Link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Link […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Political scenarios after Al-Sadr’s meeting with Allawi -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2010/07/20/political-scenarios-after-al-sadrs-meeting-with-allawi/comment-page-1/#comment-89283</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Political scenarios after Al-Sadr’s meeting with Allawi -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=8520#comment-89283</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by FCarvajal, Arabic-News. Arabic-News said: post: Political scenarios after Al-Sadr&#039;s meeting with Allawi http://bit.ly/9JevGw [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by FCarvajal, Arabic-News. Arabic-News said: post: Political scenarios after Al-Sadr’s meeting with Allawi <a href="http://bit.ly/9JevGw" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9JevGw</a> […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

